Suppr超能文献

颅底角对功能性正畸治疗效果有影响吗?一项回顾性队列研究。

Does Cranial Base Angle Make a Difference in the Effectiveness of Functional Orthopedic Treatment? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Öztürk Taner, Topsakal Uğur, Vahabova Gulsumkhanım, Yağcı Ahmet, Sheydayev Eldar

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38039, Türkiye.

Institute of Health Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38039, Türkiye.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):96. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010096.

Abstract

The literature suggests that the cranial base angle is considered one of the contributing factors to sagittal jaw malpositions when its relationship with the viscerocranium is examined. Our study aims to compare and evaluate the outcomes of fixed functional orthopedic treatment in patients with mandibular retrognathia across different cranial base groups. Participants were treated at Erciyes University with fixed functional appliances and categorized by CBA into low (<130°), medium (130°-134°), and high (>134°) groups. A total of 39 patients were included: 13 in the low CBA group (7 males, 6 females; mean age 14.62 ± 1.12 years), 13 in the medium CBA group (3 males, 9 females; mean age 14.38 ± 0.96 years), and 13 in the high CBA group (4 males, 9 females; mean age 14.08 ± 1.04 years). In the low CBA group, Ar-Go-N ( = 0.005) and SNA ( = 0.023) angles significantly decreased, while the ANB angle and Wits appraisal significantly decreased across all groups ( < 0.05). The high CBA group showed increases in ANS-Me, N-Me, N-ANS, and N-Gn lengths ( < 0.05). The medium and high CBA groups had significant increases in S-Go and ANS-Gn lengths, while Co-Gn length increased significantly in the low and high CBA groups ( < 0.05). Incisor measurements (IMPA, L1-APog, L1/NB, L1-NB) increased in all groups, with overjet and overbite reduced ( < 0.05). U1/PP ( = 0.039), U1/SN ( = 0.043), U1-NA ( = 0.030), and U1/NA ( = 0.025) parameters increased in the low CBA group, with the Upper Lip-E distance decreasing significantly in the low and high CBA groups ( < 0.05). A comparison between groups showed significant differences in U1/PP, U1-NA, and U1/NA parameters, which increased in the low and medium CBA groups but decreased in the high CBA group. CBA influences treatment outcomes. The low CBA group experienced decreases in Ar-Go-N and SNA angles, while the high CBA group showed increases in certain vertical facial dimensions. Incisor parameters rose in the low and medium CBA groups but decreased in the high CBA group, suggesting limited CBA effects on treatment results.

摘要

文献表明,当研究颅底角与面颅骨的关系时,它被认为是矢状颌骨错位的促成因素之一。我们的研究旨在比较和评估不同颅底角组下颌后缩患者接受固定功能矫治的效果。参与者在埃尔西耶斯大学接受固定功能矫治器治疗,并根据颅底角分为低颅底角组(<130°)、中颅底角组(130° - 134°)和高颅底角组(>134°)。共纳入39例患者:低颅底角组13例(男性7例,女性6例;平均年龄14.62 ± 1.12岁),中颅底角组13例(男性3例,女性9例;平均年龄14.38 ± 0.96岁),高颅底角组13例(男性4例,女性9例;平均年龄14.08 ± 1.04岁)。在低颅底角组,Ar - Go - N(P = 0.005)和SNA(P = 0.023)角显著减小,而所有组的ANB角和Wits值均显著减小(P < 0.05)。高颅底角组的ANS - Me、N - Me、N - ANS和N - Gn长度增加(P < 0.05)。中颅底角组和高颅底角组的S - Go和ANS - Gn长度显著增加,而低颅底角组和高颅底角组的Co - Gn长度显著增加(P < 0.05)。所有组的切牙测量值(IMPA、L1 - APog、L1/NB、L1 - NB)均增加,覆盖和覆合减小(P < 0.05)。低颅底角组的U1/PP(P = 0.039)、U1/SN(P = 0.043)、U1 - NA(P = 0.030)和U1/NA(P = 0.025)参数增加,低颅底角组和高颅底角组的上唇 - E距离显著减小(P < 0.05)。组间比较显示,U1/PP、U1 - NA和U1/NA参数存在显著差异,低颅底角组和中颅底角组增加,而高颅底角组减小。颅底角影响治疗效果。低颅底角组的Ar - Go - N和SNA角减小,而高颅底角组的某些垂直面部尺寸增加。低颅底角组和中颅底角组的切牙参数升高,而高颅底角组降低,表明颅底角对治疗结果的影响有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee2/11721644/20700410521b/jcm-14-00096-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验