• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新构想社区在消除结核病中的参与:来自实地的观点。

Reimagining community engagement in TB elimination: a perspective from the field.

作者信息

Ashesh A, Mehra C, Madan V, Furin J

机构信息

Survivors Against TB, New Delhi, India.

Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

IJTLD Open. 2025 Jan 1;2(1):3-5. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0578. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0578
PMID:39802226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11724523/
Abstract

The role of community engagement (CE) in TB policy, care provision and research has been recognized as important, but most models of CE put communities at the periphery of these activities. In this Editorial, written by TB-impacted community members and care providers, we explore the meaning of CE and current barriers to its implementation. We present a model of CE that places community members at the center of TB policy, care provision and research. The article concludes with advocacy points, including the need for sufficient funding for CE and genuine power-sharing between TB-affected communities and the people and programs aiming to serve them.

摘要

社区参与(CE)在结核病政策、护理提供和研究中的作用已被视为至关重要,但大多数社区参与模式将社区置于这些活动的边缘。在这篇由受结核病影响的社区成员和护理提供者撰写的社论中,我们探讨了社区参与的意义以及当前实施过程中的障碍。我们提出了一种将社区成员置于结核病政策、护理提供和研究中心的社区参与模式。文章最后提出了倡导要点,包括需要为社区参与提供充足资金,以及结核病受影响社区与旨在为其服务的人员和项目之间真正的权力共享。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5653/11724523/60ad91cd623d/ijtldopen24-0578f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5653/11724523/018f21293bb1/ijtldopen24-0578f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5653/11724523/60ad91cd623d/ijtldopen24-0578f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5653/11724523/018f21293bb1/ijtldopen24-0578f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5653/11724523/60ad91cd623d/ijtldopen24-0578f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Reimagining community engagement in TB elimination: a perspective from the field.重新构想社区在消除结核病中的参与:来自实地的观点。
IJTLD Open. 2025 Jan 1;2(1):3-5. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0578. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Fighting tuberculosis hand in hand: A call to engage communities affected by TB as essential partners in research.携手抗击结核病:呼吁让受结核病影响的社区成为研究的重要合作伙伴。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;5(4):e0004437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004437. eCollection 2025.
3
"As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community." Co-developing a multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma intervention in Cape Town, South Africa.“作为一名患者,我不属于诊所,我属于社区。” 在南非开普敦共同开展一项多层次、以患者为中心的结核病耻辱感干预措施。
Res Sq. 2024 Feb 8:rs.3.rs-3921970. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3921970/v1.
4
Engagement of vulnerable communities in HIV prevention research in India: a qualitative investigation.印度弱势社群参与艾滋病预防研究的情况:一项定性调查。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 25;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00542-w.
5
"As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community": co-developing multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma interventions in Cape Town, South Africa.“作为一名患者,我不属于诊所,我属于社区”:在南非开普敦共同开展多层次、以人为本的结核病耻辱感干预措施。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00084-z. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
Strengthening accountability for tuberculosis policy implementation in South Africa: perspectives from policymakers, civil society, and communities.加强南非结核病政策实施的问责制:政策制定者、民间社会和社区的观点
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00077-y. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
Exploring the value of community engagement activities within a participatory action research study to improve care for people affected by skin neglected tropical diseases in Liberia.在一项参与式行动研究中探索社区参与活动对改善利比里亚皮肤被忽视热带病患者护理的价值。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00695-2.
8
[Tuberculosis care and new horizon of Japanese society].[日本社会的结核病防治与新视野]
Kekkaku. 2012 Apr;87(4):367-81.
9
Perceived enablers and barriers of community engagement for vaccination in India: Using socioecological analysis.印度社区参与疫苗接种的感知促进因素和障碍:使用社会生态学分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253318. eCollection 2021.
10
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.南非和津巴布韦社区成员及研究人员在一个生态健康项目中的社区参与经历。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Stigma, depression, quality of life, and the need for psychosocial support among people with tuberculosis in Indonesia: A multi-site cross-sectional study.印度尼西亚结核病患者的耻辱感、抑郁、生活质量及心理社会支持需求:一项多地点横断面研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;4(1):e0002489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002489. eCollection 2024.
2
The community as an active part in the implementation of interventions for the prevention and care of tuberculosis: A scoping review.社区作为结核病预防和护理干预措施实施中的积极组成部分:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;3(12):e0001482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001482. eCollection 2023.
3
Beyond individual inclusion, investment in affected communities is needed to end tuberculosis.
除了关注个体病例外,还需要对受影响社区进行投入,以终结结核病。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 21;402(10411):1398-1400. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01892-5. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Community health volunteers' contribution to tuberculosis patients notified to National Tuberculosis program through contact investigation in Kenya.社区卫生志愿者通过肯尼亚的接触者调查,为国家结核病规划报告的结核患者做出的贡献。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09271-7.
5
Coproduction: when users define quality.共同生产:用户定义质量之时。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):711-716. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009830. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Trained community volunteers improve tuberculosis knowledge and attitudes among adults in a periurban community in southwest Nigeria.训练有素的社区志愿者提高了尼日利亚西南部一个城郊社区成年人对结核病的认识和态度。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Mar;92(3):625-32. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0527. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
7
Community based interventions for the prevention and control of tuberculosis.基于社区的结核病防控干预措施。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2014 Aug 1;3:27. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-3-27. eCollection 2014.
8
A model for bidirectional community-academic engagement (CAE): overview of partnered research, capacity enhancement, systems transformation, and public trust in research.双向社区-学术合作参与(CAE)模型:合作研究、能力提升、系统变革及公众对研究的信任概述
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4):1806-24. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0155.
9
Challenges for community role in tuberculosis response.社区在结核病应对中的挑战。
Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2059-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60581-8. Epub 2010 May 18.
10
Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries.全球卫生领域的重大挑战:发展中国家社区参与研究
PLoS Med. 2007 Sep;4(9):e273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273.