Maile Andrew Jonathan
Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Philos Psychol. 2024 Jul 22;38(1):304-330. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2024.2379987. eCollection 2025.
In his account of phenomenological psychopathology, Karl Jaspers advocates for the central role of subjective experience, something which he maintains cannot be accessed through intellectual effort, but through "empathic understanding" alone. In contradistinction to Jaspers' account, I propose that phenomenology, as a process of inquiry and investigation, is fundamentally epistemological. Accordingly, I offer an intellectual virtue characterization of phenomenological psychopathology, using open-mindedness to illustrate the close conceptual links between the phenomenological endeavor and the intellectual virtues. By introducing the intellectual virtue lexicon into the phenomenological psychopathology discourse, I then offer three preliminary recommendations for the training and education of phenomenological clinicians. Centering the educational recommendations on the psychiatric interview, I suggest that good questioning, listening, and reflecting necessarily require cultivation for intellectually virtuous phenomenological inquiry.
卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯在其对现象学精神病理学的阐述中,主张主观体验的核心作用,他认为这种体验无法通过智力努力获得,而只能通过“移情理解”来达成。与雅斯贝尔斯的阐述不同,我认为现象学作为一种探究和调查的过程,从根本上说是认识论的。因此,我对现象学精神病理学进行了一种理智德性的刻画,以开放性思维为例来说明现象学研究与理智德性之间紧密的概念联系。通过将理智德性词汇引入现象学精神病理学的论述中,我进而为现象学临床医生的培训和教育提出了三项初步建议。以精神病访谈为教育建议的核心,我认为良好的提问、倾听和反思对于进行理智德性的现象学探究来说必然需要培养。