• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物性食品消费中的社会经济差异:起作用的是教育而非收入。

Socioeconomic differences in animal food consumption: Education rather than income makes a difference.

作者信息

Klink Urte, Mata Jutta, Frank Roland, Schüz Benjamin

机构信息

Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Prevention and Health Promotion, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Health Psychology, Department of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 3;9:993379. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.993379. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.993379
PMID:36407520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9668869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence points toward more sustainable and health-conscious dietary behaviors among individuals with higher socioeconomic status. However, these differences vary considerably depending on which indicator of socioeconomic status is examined. Here, we present a systematic parallel investigation of multiple indicators of socioeconomic status as predictors of animal food consumption frequency and selected food-related behaviors in Germany.

METHODS

Data from the German subsample of two large representative European consumer studies (Study 1 = 1,954; Study 2 = 2,045) was used. We assessed the associations between the socioeconomic indicators income, current occupation as well as education and consumption frequency of animal foods and selected food-related behaviors in separate ordinal logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Individuals with higher educational attainment engaged in more sustainable and health-conscious dietary behaviors, indicated by significant associations between educational attainment and the consumption frequency of animal foods. Low- and middle-income participants consumed processed meat more frequently (Study 1 only; medium income: OR 1.5, CI 1.09-2.05, = 0.012; low income: OR 1.43, CI 1.01-2.05, = 0.047) and fish less frequently (Study 2 only; medium income: OR 0.76, CI 0.59-0.97, = 0.026; low income: OR 0.061, CI 0.46-0.82, < 0.001) than participants with high income. Current occupation did not predict the consumption of animal foods or food-related behaviors. Intake frequency of animal-based foods indicates that most participants exceeded national dietary recommendations for meat and processed meat and remained below recommendations for fish and dairy/eggs intake.

CONCLUSION

Educational attainment appears to be the strongest and most consistent socioeconomic indicator of sustainable dietary choices in Germany based on current large, representative studies. Future efforts should be directed toward education interventions about nutrition and interpretation of food labels to compensate for differences in dietary behavior among groups with different levels of education.

摘要

背景/目的:有证据表明,社会经济地位较高的个体的饮食行为更具可持续性且更注重健康。然而,这些差异会因所考察的社会经济地位指标的不同而有很大差异。在此,我们对德国社会经济地位的多个指标作为动物性食品消费频率及特定饮食相关行为预测因素进行了系统的平行调查。

方法

使用了两项大型欧洲代表性消费者研究中德国子样本的数据(研究1 = 1954人;研究2 = 2045人)。我们在单独的有序逻辑回归中评估了社会经济指标收入、当前职业以及教育程度与动物性食品消费频率及特定饮食相关行为之间的关联。

结果

教育程度较高的个体表现出更具可持续性且更注重健康的饮食行为,这体现在教育程度与动物性食品消费频率之间存在显著关联。低收入和中等收入参与者食用加工肉类更为频繁(仅在研究1中;中等收入:比值比1.5,置信区间1.09 - 2.05,P = 0.012;低收入:比值比1.43,置信区间1.01 - 2.05,P = 0.047),而食用鱼类的频率低于高收入参与者(仅在研究2中;中等收入:比值比0.76,置信区间0.59 - 0.97,P = 0.026;低收入:比值比0.61,置信区间0.46 - 0.82,P < 0.001)。当前职业并不能预测动物性食品的消费或饮食相关行为。动物性食品的摄入频率表明,大多数参与者超过了国家对肉类和加工肉类的膳食建议摄入量,而鱼类和奶制品/蛋类的摄入量仍低于建议水平。

结论

根据当前大规模代表性研究,在德国,教育程度似乎是可持续饮食选择最强且最一致的社会经济指标。未来的努力应指向营养教育干预以及食品标签解读,以弥补不同教育水平群体在饮食行为上的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0949/9668869/a67acd221671/fnut-09-993379-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0949/9668869/a67acd221671/fnut-09-993379-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0949/9668869/a67acd221671/fnut-09-993379-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic differences in animal food consumption: Education rather than income makes a difference.动物性食品消费中的社会经济差异:起作用的是教育而非收入。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 3;9:993379. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.993379. eCollection 2022.
2
3
Education- and income-related differences in processed meat consumption across Europe: The role of food-related attitudes.教育和收入对欧洲加工肉类消费的影响差异:与食物相关的态度的作用。
Appetite. 2023 Mar 1;182:106417. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106417. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
5
Ultra-processed food intake and animal-based food intake and mortality in the Adventist Health Study-2.超加工食品摄入和动物源食品摄入与 Adventist Health Study-2 中的死亡率。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun 7;115(6):1589-1601. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac043.
6
Independent association between socioeconomic indicators and macro- and micro-nutrient intake in Switzerland.瑞士社会经济指标与常量和微量营养素摄入量之间的独立关联。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):e0174578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174578. eCollection 2017.
7
Delaying the introduction of complementary food until 6 months does not affect appetite or mother's report of food acceptance of breast-fed infants from 6 to 12 months in a low income, Honduran population.在洪都拉斯低收入人群中,将辅食添加推迟至6个月大,对6至12个月大母乳喂养婴儿的食欲或母亲报告的食物接受情况并无影响。
J Nutr. 1995 Nov;125(11):2787-92. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.11.2787.
8
Socio-Cultural and Economic Drivers of Plant and Animal Protein Consumption in Malaysia: The SCRiPT Study.马来西亚植物性和动物性蛋白质消费的社会文化和经济驱动因素:SCRiPT 研究。
Nutrients. 2020 May 25;12(5):1530. doi: 10.3390/nu12051530.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Low Educational Attainment and Higher Colorectal Cancer Risk: Mediatory Effect of Lifestyle-Associated Factors Within Local Context.低教育程度与较高结直肠癌风险的关联:当地背景下生活方式相关因素的中介作用
World J Oncol. 2025 Jul 8;16(4):388-396. doi: 10.14740/wjon2599. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
[Understanding and changing social disparities in health behaviour: nutrition as an interface between social inequality and health].理解并改变健康行为中的社会差异:营养作为社会不平等与健康之间的一个交汇点
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04099-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Small targeted dietary changes can yield substantial gains for human health and the environment.有针对性地进行微小的饮食改变,可为人类健康和环境带来显著益处。
Nat Food. 2021 Aug;2(8):616-627. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00343-4. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
Prevalence of persons following a vegetarian diet in Germany.德国遵循素食饮食的人群比例。
J Health Monit. 2016 Dec 14;1(2):2-14. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2016-039. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Attitudes, perceptions and behaviours regarding meat consumption in Germany: results of the NEMONIT study.
Educational Attainment as a Super Determinant of Diet Quality and Dietary Inequities.
教育程度作为饮食质量和饮食不平等的超级决定因素。
Adv Nutr. 2025 Jul 17;16(9):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100482.
4
Meat consumption among different social groups and specific options for reducing it: a literature review of empirical research.不同社会群体的肉类消费及其减少肉类消费的具体方法:实证研究文献综述
Front Sociol. 2025 May 23;10:1547663. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1547663. eCollection 2025.
5
Adherence to Dietary Recommendations for Red and Processed Meat in Poland: Insights from the 2017-2020 National Nutrition Survey.波兰对红肉和加工肉类饮食建议的遵循情况:2017 - 2020年全国营养调查的见解
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 25;17(5):790. doi: 10.3390/nu17050790.
6
Acceptability and fidelity of the multidomain 'Brain Bootcamp' dementia risk reduction program: a mixed-methods approach.多领域“大脑训练营”痴呆症风险降低项目的可接受性和保真度:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21641-7.
7
Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.不断变化的胃口:欧洲肉类替代品的当前证据与未来展望
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e4753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4753. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Diet Quality and Past Changes in Food Consumption as Determinants of Intentions to Eat Less Meat and More Plant-Based Foods.饮食质量和过去食物消费的变化作为减少肉类摄入和增加植物性食物摄入意愿的决定因素。
Foods. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):3767. doi: 10.3390/foods13233767.
9
Including educational status may improve cardiovascular risk calculations such as SCORE2.纳入教育状况可能会改善心血管风险评估,如SCORE2。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 11;11:1345277. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1345277. eCollection 2024.
10
Trends in the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions from food and beverage purchases in Mexico: 1989-2020.墨西哥食品和饮料购买产生的温室气体排放贡献趋势:1989-2020 年。
Nutr J. 2024 May 18;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00955-z.
德国肉类消费的态度、看法和行为:NEMONIT 研究结果。
J Nutr Sci. 2021 May 26;10:e39. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.34. eCollection 2021.
4
Putting Knowledge into Practice: Low-Income Women Talk about Food Choice Decisions.付诸实践:低收入妇女谈食物选择决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):5092. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145092.
5
Associations Between Nutrition Knowledge and Overall Diet Quality: The Moderating Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics-Results From the PREDISE Study.营养知识与整体饮食质量的关联:来自 PREDISE 研究的社会人口特征的调节作用。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/0890117120928877. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
How to transition to reduced-meat diets that benefit people and the planet.如何过渡到有益于人类和地球的低肉饮食。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137208. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Nutrition and longevity - From mechanisms to uncertainties.营养与长寿——从机制到不确定性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(18):3063-3082. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1676698. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Meat consumers and non-meat consumers in Germany: a characterisation based on results of the German National Nutrition Survey II.德国的肉类消费者与非肉类消费者:基于德国第二次全国营养调查结果的特征分析
J Nutr Sci. 2019 Jun 7;8:e21. doi: 10.1017/jns.2019.17. eCollection 2019.
9
Do young adults value sustainable diet practices? Continuity in values from adolescence to adulthood and linkages to dietary behaviour.年轻人重视可持续的饮食实践吗?青少年到成年期价值观的连续性及其与饮食行为的联系。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(14):2598-2608. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900096X. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
10
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.