Suppr超能文献

使用混合方法评估低收入和中等收入国家中阻碍循证计划生育实践扩大规模的瓶颈的方案。

Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods.

作者信息

Kabra Rita, Church Kathryn, Allagh Komal Preet, Saad Abdulmumin, Ali Moazzam, Steyn Petrus, Kiarie James

机构信息

Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e087191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087191.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Scaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and donor support exist in many countries to adopt and scale up a range of EBPs, including postpregnancy FP, task sharing for FP and the promotion of social and behaviour change (SBC) for FP. While there has been some success in implementing these practices, coverage remains inadequate in many countries. To gain a better understanding of the factors that may be hindering the sustained scale-up of these interventions, WHO has developed an assessment protocol to systematically identify the health systems' 'bottlenecks' to implementation and to then identify solutions and develop strategies to address them.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed method approach that includes document review, secondary data analysis (from surveys, service delivery data and case studies) and key informant interviews with policymakers, programme managers, health providers and community groups will be used to identify bottlenecks. This will be followed by a workshop to prioritise bottlenecks and characterise their root causes. Finally, solutions for the root causes of prioritised bottlenecks will be proposed. The protocol is structured in a modular format, with separate modules on postpregnancy FP, task sharing and SBC. Assessment themes and questions are informed by a wide body of literature on the three programmatic components, as well as studies on health policy implementation and scale-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was exempt from ethical review by the WHO ethics committee. The findings of the bottleneck analysis will be presented at local, national and international conferences and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and webinars.

摘要

引言

按照世界卫生组织的建议,扩大计划生育方面基于证据的做法(EBP),已日益被全球卫生行为体视为其使命、目标和活动的核心。许多国家都制定了国家政策、战略、指南、培训材料、政治承诺和捐助方支持,以采用和扩大一系列基于证据的做法,包括产后计划生育、计划生育任务分担以及促进计划生育的社会和行为改变(SBC)。虽然在实施这些做法方面取得了一些成功,但许多国家的覆盖范围仍然不足。为了更好地了解可能阻碍这些干预措施持续扩大规模的因素,世界卫生组织制定了一项评估方案,以系统地确定卫生系统在实施方面的“瓶颈”,然后确定解决方案并制定应对策略。

方法与分析

将采用一种混合方法,包括文件审查、二次数据分析(来自调查、服务提供数据和案例研究)以及与政策制定者、项目管理人员、卫生服务提供者和社区团体进行关键信息访谈,以确定瓶颈。随后将举办一次研讨会,对瓶颈进行优先排序并确定其根本原因。最后,将针对优先排序的瓶颈的根本原因提出解决方案。该方案采用模块化格式构建,分别设有关于产后计划生育、任务分担和社会和行为改变的模块。评估主题和问题参考了关于这三个项目组成部分的大量文献,以及关于卫生政策实施和扩大规模的研究。

伦理与传播

该方案无需世界卫生组织伦理委员会进行伦理审查。瓶颈分析的结果将在地方、国家和国际会议上公布,并通过同行评审出版物和网络研讨会进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24be/11664384/2de9c288eac5/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验