Ransom Eric M, Wallace Meghan A, Wiederhold Nathan P, Cañete-Gibas Connie, Burnham Carey-Ann D
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Feb 19;63(2):e0154824. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01548-24. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
Rapid and accurate identification of cultured molds is important to determine clinical significance and therapeutic decision-making. Conventional mold identification uses phenotypic macroscopic and microscopic characterization; however, this can take days or weeks for colony maturity and definitive microscopic structure formation, be limited to genus-level identification, and be misidentified due to morphologic mimics or similarities between closely related species. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) revolutionized bacterial and yeast identification but remains uncommon for molds in part because of limited reference libraries. Here, a retrospective 5-year review at a large teaching hospital found that 88.6% of identified molds were in the Bruker Filamentous Fungi Library 3.0 and 91.5% in the VITEK Knowledge Base Library 3.2.0. A prospective evaluation was also performed on early growth from 205 consecutive, working clinical isolates. Each mold was processed using the VITEK chemical extraction method and modified NIH chemical plus bead-beating extraction method; both extractions were tested on both systems. When compared to conventional identification, more molds were identified using VITEK extractions over NIH extractions using the VITEK (65 and 59%) and Bruker (56 and 54%) systems, respectively, using the ≥1.5 log Bruker threshold. VITEK MS identified more molds, regardless of the extraction method. Isolates without consensus agreement ( = 116) underwent sequence-based identification, which demonstrated that conventional identification had the highest genus-level (84%) but lowest species-level (3%) identification rates compared to VITEK (59 and 52%, respectively) and Bruker (52 and 36%) using VITEK extractions. Taken together, our findings suggest both MALDI-TOF systems can supplement conventional mold identification to optimize identification rates with species-level distinction.
Mold identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) remains uncommon in clinical laboratories. Contributing concerns include limited genus/species spectra in the MALDI-TOF MS libraries, varying success rates in the literature regarding extraction methods and instrumentation, and the lack of practical performance evaluations using early mold colony growth, which would be used in a clinical mycology laboratory. This study used multiple approaches to improve our understanding of the clinical utility and performance of MALDI-TOF MS mold identification.
快速准确地鉴定培养的霉菌对于确定临床意义和治疗决策至关重要。传统的霉菌鉴定采用表型宏观和微观特征;然而,这可能需要数天或数周才能使菌落成熟并形成明确的微观结构,仅限于属水平的鉴定,并且由于形态学模仿或密切相关物种之间的相似性而可能被误鉴定。基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)彻底改变了细菌和酵母的鉴定,但在霉菌鉴定中仍不常见,部分原因是参考文库有限。在此,一家大型教学医院进行的一项为期5年的回顾性研究发现,88.6%的已鉴定霉菌在布鲁克丝状真菌文库3.0中,91.5%在VITEK知识库文库3.2.0中。还对205株连续的临床工作分离株的早期生长进行了前瞻性评估。每种霉菌都采用VITEK化学提取法和改良的美国国立卫生研究院化学加珠磨提取法进行处理;两种提取物都在两个系统上进行了测试。与传统鉴定相比,使用VITEK提取法在VITEK(65%和59%)和布鲁克(56%和54%)系统上分别比使用美国国立卫生研究院提取法鉴定出更多的霉菌,使用≥1.5对数布鲁克阈值。无论采用何种提取方法,VITEK MS鉴定出的霉菌更多。没有达成共识的分离株(n = 116)进行了基于序列的鉴定,结果表明,与使用VITEK提取法的VITEK(分别为59%和52%)和布鲁克(52%和36%)相比,传统鉴定在属水平的鉴定率最高(84%),但在种水平的鉴定率最低(3%)。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,两种MALDI-TOF系统都可以补充传统的霉菌鉴定,以优化具有种水平区分的鉴定率。
使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)进行霉菌鉴定在临床实验室中仍然不常见。相关问题包括MALDI-TOF MS文库中属/种光谱有限、文献中关于提取方法和仪器的成功率各不相同,以及缺乏使用早期霉菌菌落生长的实际性能评估,而这将在临床真菌学实验室中使用。本研究采用多种方法来提高我们对MALDI-TOF MS霉菌鉴定的临床实用性和性能的理解。