Suppr超能文献

一项关于血管紧张素II对维持性血液透析患者抽筋减少作用的先导性、单盲、随机交叉试验(CRAMP-HD研究)。

A Pilot, Single-Blinded, Randomized Crossover Trial of Cramp Reduction with Angiotensin II in Maintenance Patients on Hemodialysis (the CRAMP-HD Study).

作者信息

Phongphithakchai Atthaphong, Bellomo Rinaldo, Mount Peter, Bach Cindy-Anne T, Gurry Greta, Liu Wendy, Maeda Akinori, Pattamin Nuttapol, Hikasa Yukiko, Spano Sofia, Chaba Anis, Eastwood Glenn, Chawla Mink, Atkinson Arthur J, Wilkie James, See Emily J

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand,

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2025;56(3):377-388. doi: 10.1159/000543280. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin II may reduce muscle ischemia during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and thereby decrease the incidence and/or intensity of intradialytic muscle cramps. We aimed to test whether angiotensin II infusion during IHD is safe, feasible, and effective in the attenuation of muscle cramps.

METHODS

We performed a pilot, single-blinded, randomized crossover trial of patients receiving IHD who frequently experience intradialytic muscle cramps. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous angiotensin II or placebo for the duration of their first dialysis session of the week. They crossed over to the alternate arm each week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included cramp-related symptoms, hemodynamic parameters, dialysis prescription alterations, and biomarkers.

RESULTS

We studied 24 sessions in 6 patients. Intradialytic hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg) occurred more often with angiotensin II than with placebo (4/12 sessions, 33% vs. 2/12 sessions, 17% sessions, p = 0.64). There were no other adverse events. Compared with placebo, muscle cramps were less frequent (4/12 sessions, 33% vs. 11/12 sessions, 92% sessions, p = 0.009) and of lower intensity with angiotensin II (median Brief Pain Inventory score 1.4 vs. 5.3; p < 0.001; maximal Brief Pain Inventory score 1.2 vs. 6.0; p < 0.001). Fluid bolus administration for cramps was less common during angiotensin II infusion than placebo (0/12 sessions, 0% vs. 5/12 sessions, 42% sessions, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Angiotensin II increased blood pressure and heart rate but not cardiac output or levels of troponin, creatine kinase, or renin. Angiotensin II infusion during IHD appears safe and effective at reducing intradialytic muscle cramps. These observations justify further investigation in larger controlled studies.

摘要

引言

血管紧张素II可能会减轻间歇性血液透析(IHD)期间的肌肉缺血,从而降低透析期间肌肉痉挛的发生率和/或严重程度。我们旨在测试IHD期间输注血管紧张素II在减轻肌肉痉挛方面是否安全、可行且有效。

方法

我们对经常发生透析期间肌肉痉挛的接受IHD的患者进行了一项先导性、单盲、随机交叉试验。患者在一周的第一次透析期间被随机分配接受静脉注射血管紧张素II或安慰剂。他们每周交叉到另一组,共4周。主要结局是安全性。次要结局包括与痉挛相关的症状、血流动力学参数、透析处方改变和生物标志物。

结果

我们研究了6名患者的24次透析。血管紧张素II组透析期间高血压(收缩压>180 mmHg)的发生率高于安慰剂组(4/12次透析,33%对2/12次透析,17%;p = 0.64)。没有其他不良事件。与安慰剂相比,血管紧张素II组肌肉痉挛的发生率更低(4/12次透析,33%对11/12次透析,92%;p = 0.009),且严重程度更低(简明疼痛量表中位数评分1.4对5.3;p < 0.001;简明疼痛量表最大评分1.2对6.0;p < 0.001)。血管紧张素II输注期间因痉挛进行补液的情况比安慰剂组少见(0/12次透析,0%对5/12次透析,42%;p = 0.037)。

结论

血管紧张素II可升高血压和心率,但不影响心输出量或肌钙蛋白、肌酸激酶或肾素水平。IHD期间输注血管紧张素II似乎在减少透析期间肌肉痉挛方面安全有效。这些观察结果证明有必要在更大规模的对照研究中进一步探究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3256/12169806/977e27f9df3a/ajn-2025-0056-0003-543280_F01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验