Zigman Suchsland Monica, van Rensburg Dillon, McGrath Kelly, Wilkinson Cody, Johnson Kimberly, Steinbruecker Ashley, Probus James, Cole Allison
University of Washington, Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 12;9(1):e4. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.669. eCollection 2025.
Translational science rarely addresses the needs of rural communities, perpetuating health inequities. Furthermore, policy and resource allocation reflect this dynamic. Through a partnership between a rural community and a community engagement program, the Rural Health Initiative (RHI) was developed with the goal of building capacity for community-driven translational research in rural settings.
We describe the process of forming the RHI and selection of a community health priority to motivate the translational research agenda in this particular rural setting. We used a mixed methods approach utilizing literature review, community survey data, and qualitative evaluation of community meeting discussions. Consensus on a final health priority was built through voting and comparison of voting responses across the three RHI counties through Fisher's Exact test.
Four priority topics were identified through literature search, community needs assessment, state/national trend data, and community experts. Priority ranking from a community forum and survey selected the final health priority topic. Healthcare access was selected by all three counties in the RHI community as the most critical health priority to address.
This program highlights the importance of and methods for community involvement in directing the research conducted in their community. Additionally, through this project, guidance was developed to define the role of community engagement programs supporting work led by communities.
转化科学很少关注农村社区的需求,从而使健康不平等现象长期存在。此外,政策和资源分配也反映了这种情况。通过农村社区与社区参与项目之间的合作,开展了农村健康倡议(RHI),其目标是建设农村地区社区驱动的转化研究能力。
我们描述了形成RHI以及选择社区健康优先事项以推动该特定农村地区转化研究议程的过程。我们采用了混合方法,利用文献综述、社区调查数据以及对社区会议讨论的定性评估。通过投票以及运用费舍尔精确检验对RHI三个县的投票结果进行比较,就最终的健康优先事项达成了共识。
通过文献检索、社区需求评估、州/国家趋势数据以及社区专家,确定了四个优先主题。社区论坛和调查的优先排序选出了最终的健康优先主题。RHI社区的所有三个县都选择医疗保健可及性作为最关键的健康优先事项加以解决。
该项目突出了社区参与指导在其社区开展的研究的重要性和方法。此外,通过这个项目,还制定了指南,以界定社区参与项目在支持社区主导工作方面的作用。