Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项包含两种主观工具的回顾性自然主义研究。

TMS in major depression: A retrospective naturalistic study including two subjective tools.

作者信息

Pridmore Saxby, Peterson Gregory M, Rybak Marzena, Byrne Karen, Dillon Tae, Turnier-Shea Yvonne, Naguy Ahmed

机构信息

Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;33(3):475-480. doi: 10.1177/10398562251314301. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo report the outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of patients with acute major depressive disorder (MDD), with particular attention to the performance of the individual assessment tools, including two new subjective mood scales.MethodsPatients with MDD were treated with up to 35 daily TMS sessions. Objective quantification of mood utilised the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S). Subjective quantification was made using the Subjective Depression Scale (SDS6) and a new Daily Emotion Score (DES) - a single question which is asked daily.ResultsNinety consecutive patients (58 females; 64.4%) with a mean age of 46.9 years were included. Using HAM-D6 criteria, 51 patients (56.7%) achieved remission. Scores obtained using the different tools correlated well at the same time point, especially at the conclusion of TMS therapy. The only statistically significant independent predictors of remission were the percentage improvement at session 10 (relative to baseline) in the SDS6 ( = .0026) and in the DES ( = .043).ConclusionThe SDS6 was confirmed as a valuable companion for the HAM-D6. The DES correlated with the other subjective tool (SDS6); the latter, in particular, may also have utility in predicting treatment outcome.

摘要

目的

报告经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗急性重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的结果,特别关注个体评估工具的表现,包括两个新的主观情绪量表。

方法

MDD患者接受了最多35次的每日TMS治疗。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D6)和临床总体印象-严重程度量表(CGI-S)对情绪进行客观量化。主观量化使用主观抑郁量表(SDS6)和一个新的每日情绪评分(DES)——一个每天都会问到的单一问题。

结果

纳入了90例连续患者(58名女性;64.4%),平均年龄为46.9岁。根据HAM-D6标准,51例患者(56.7%)实现缓解。在同一时间点,使用不同工具获得的分数相关性良好,尤其是在TMS治疗结束时。缓解的唯一具有统计学意义的独立预测因素是第10次治疗时(相对于基线)SDS6(P = .0026)和DES(P = .043)的改善百分比。

结论

SDS6被确认为HAM-D6的有价值的辅助工具。DES与另一个主观工具(SDS6)相关;特别是后者,在预测治疗结果方面可能也有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8134/12138150/8002f9dce10b/10.1177_10398562251314301-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验