• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰儿童及青少年创伤筛查工具的心理测量准确性

Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener.

作者信息

Kooij Lieke H, Hein Irma M, Sachser Cedric, Bouwmeester Samantha, Bosse Madelief, Lindauer Ramón J L

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2450985. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985
PMID:39835599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753014/
Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometrics of the Dutch version of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2). By this, an international recognized instrument to screen symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTSS) in children and adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) becomes available for Dutch youth. Based on the validated CATS-2 we established the Dutch version, named the KJTS. A total of 587 children and adolescent, age 7-21, and 658 caregivers referred to mental health care services in Amsterdam was included in the study to examine psychometric properties. The construct was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Furthermore reliability, convergent-divergent patterns and diagnostic test accuracy were examined. The underlying DSM-5 factor structure with four symptom clusters (re-experiencing, avoidance, negative alterations in mood and cognitions, hyperarousal) was supported by CFA showing a good fit for the selfreport (CFI = .95, TLI = .94), and an acceptable fit for the caregiver report (CFI = .90, TLI = .89). The KJTS showed excellent reliability (alpha = .92) on both selfreport and caregiver report. The convergent-discriminant validity pattern showed medium to strong correlations with measures of internalization problems, such as anxiety and affective problems ( = .44-.72) and low to medium correlations with externalizing symptoms ( = .21-.36). The ROC-curve analysis has proven a good accuracy (AUC = .81;  = 106). This study demonstrates the psychometric accuracy of the KJTS in a Dutch clinical population. The KJTS reflects adequately the dimensionality of PTSD as described in the DSM-5, with a good fit for selfreports, an acceptable fit for caregiver reports, excellent reliability and sufficient validity. Limitations are described. The outcomes support the use of the KJTS in research and clinical practice for screening and monitoring of PTSS.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查荷兰版儿童与青少年创伤筛查工具(CATS-2)的心理测量学特性。通过这项研究,一种根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)筛查儿童和青少年创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的国际认可工具可供荷兰青少年使用。基于经过验证的CATS-2,我们建立了荷兰版,命名为KJTS。共有587名7至21岁的儿童和青少年以及658名转介至阿姆斯特丹心理健康服务机构的照料者被纳入研究,以检验心理测量学特性。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对结构进行了测试。此外,还检验了信度、聚合-区分模式和诊断测试准确性。CFA支持了DSM-5中具有四个症状群(再体验、回避、情绪和认知的消极改变、过度警觉)的潜在因子结构,自我报告显示拟合良好(CFI = 0.95,TLI = 0.94),照料者报告显示拟合可接受(CFI = 0.90,TLI = 0.89)。KJTS在自我报告和照料者报告上均显示出优异的信度(α = 0.92)。聚合-区分效度模式显示与内化问题测量指标(如焦虑和情感问题)存在中等至强的相关性(r = 0.44 - 0.72),与外化症状存在低至中等的相关性(r = 0.21 - 0.36)。ROC曲线分析已证明具有良好的准确性(AUC = 0.81;p = 106)。本研究证明了KJTS在荷兰临床人群中的心理测量学准确性。KJTS充分反映了DSM-5中描述的创伤后应激障碍的维度,自我报告拟合良好,照料者报告拟合可接受,信度优异,效度充分。文中描述了局限性。研究结果支持在研究和临床实践中使用KJTS来筛查和监测PTSS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/41ae7d7073f0/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0003_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/91a16747d687/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/345b904ebe08/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0002_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/41ae7d7073f0/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0003_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/91a16747d687/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/345b904ebe08/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0002_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b86/11753014/41ae7d7073f0/ZEPT_A_2450985_F0003_OB.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener.荷兰儿童及青少年创伤筛查工具的心理测量准确性
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2450985. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建与初步验证:从照顾者角度评估儿童的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂PTSD(CPTSD)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2493025. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025. Epub 2025 May 6.
3
International development and psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS).儿童青少年创伤筛查量表(CATS)的国际发展及心理测量特性
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.040. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index (PTSD RI-5) in a Turkish Clinical sample of trauma-exposed children.对土耳其受创伤儿童临床样本进行的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(PTSD RI - 5)的心理测量评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2465082. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2465082. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) in a sample of Swedish children.儿童青少年创伤筛查量表(CATS)在瑞典儿童样本中的心理测量特性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 May;75(4):247-256. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1840628. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
7
Psychometric properties and validity of the German version of the Post-Traumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5 (PDS-5).《DSM-5 创伤后诊断量表(PDS-5)德文版的心理测量特性和效度》。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 24;12(1):1965339. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1965339. eCollection 2021.
8
Cross-cultural validation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale for DSM-5, child and adolescent version in Japan.跨文化验证 DSM-5 儿童和青少年版临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表在日本的适用性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2424607. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2424607. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
9
Assessing complex PTSD and PTSD: validation of the German version of the International Trauma Interview (ITI).评估复杂创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍:国际创伤访谈(ITI)德语版的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2344364. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2344364. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Preliminary validation of the Dutch version of the Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) after traumatic brain injury in a civilian population.创伤性脑损伤后平民人群中 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)荷兰语版本的初步验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 20;15(4):e0231857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231857. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
PTSD symptom changes during Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TF-CBT) in children and adolescents: a Single-Case Experimental Design study.儿童和青少年在创伤聚焦认知行为疗法(TF-CBT)期间的创伤后应激障碍症状变化:一项单病例实验设计研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2538355. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2538355. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
EMpower Parents: Effectiveness of EMDR treatment for parental PTSD related to a child's medical condition in a randomized controlled trial.增强父母能力:眼动脱敏再处理疗法治疗与孩子疾病相关的父母创伤后应激障碍的随机对照试验效果
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;13(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03043-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The role of childhood cumulative trauma in the risk of lifetime PTSD: An epidemiological study.童年期累积性创伤在终生 PTSD 风险中的作用:一项流行病学研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Jun;336:115887. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115887. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
3
Development and evaluation of the Trauma Screener-Intellectual Disability: a post-traumatic stress disorder screening tool for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.
《创伤筛查量表-智力残疾版的开发与评估:一种用于轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能成人的创伤后应激障碍筛查工具》
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Feb;69(2):127-136. doi: 10.1111/jir.13198. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
The Economic Burden of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the United States From a Societal Perspective.
从社会视角看美国创伤后应激障碍的经济负担
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;83(3):21m14116. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14116.
4
Who Reports What? A Comparison of Child and Caregivers´ Reports of Child Trauma Exposure and Associations to Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Clinics.谁来报告?儿童和照料者报告的儿童创伤暴露情况比较,以及其与儿童和青少年心理健康诊所中创伤后应激症状和功能障碍的关联。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Jul;49(7):919-934. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00788-y. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.重新思考进行验证性因素分析的条件。
Span J Psychol. 2020 Dec 4;23:e55. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.56.
6
Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) in a sample of Swedish children.儿童青少年创伤筛查量表(CATS)在瑞典儿童样本中的心理测量特性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 May;75(4):247-256. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1840628. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
7
Patterns and predictors of PTSD in treatment-seeking African refugees and asylum seekers: A latent class analysis.寻求治疗的非洲难民和寻求庇护者中 PTSD 的模式和预测因素:潜在类别分析。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;67(4):386-396. doi: 10.1177/0020764020959095. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Screening Efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Systematic Review.儿童行为量表和长处与困难问卷的筛查效率:一项系统评价
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2008 Sep;13(3):140-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00461.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
9
The effectiveness of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心理干预对儿童、青少年和青年成年人创伤后应激障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1598-1612. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720002007. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
How expensive are post-traumatic stress disorders? Estimating incremental health care and economic costs on anonymised claims data.创伤后应激障碍有多昂贵?基于匿名索赔数据估算增量医疗保健和经济成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):917-930. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01184-x. Epub 2020 May 26.