• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士驾驶视觉功能评估全国共识

National Consensus on the Assessment of Visual Function for Driving in Switzerland.

作者信息

Blaser Frank, Schneebeli Martina, Keller Kristina H, Pfäffli Matthias, Todorova Margarita G, Kaeser Pierre-François, Anastasi Stefano, Wildberger Hannes, Bochmann Frank, Zweifel Sandrine, Said Sadiq

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Traffic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Apr;242(4):507-514. doi: 10.1055/a-2479-9305. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1055/a-2479-9305
PMID:39837537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12020669/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland.

METHODS

The minimum medical requirements for visual function for fitness to drive are regulated by Swiss Federal Law, namely, by the Traffic Licensing Ordinance (TLO). The medical examination techniques relevant in this context and their assessment are not further specified therein, which leads to legal inequality among drivers and uncertainty among examiners. We established a study group of representatives of the Traffic Medicine Section of the Swiss Society of Forensic Medicine and the Traffic Commission of the Swiss Society of Ophthalmology to develop a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland. In structured meetings, the authors discussed medical examination techniques and available international and local recommendations on this topic, with respect to Swiss legislation. In the event of a contrary opinion, the topic was discussed again in a follow-up session until we reached an agreement. We defined consensus as complete agreement on the subject under discussion.

RESULTS

The study group held five in-person meetings between March 2019 and January 2023. The authors developed recommendations intended for all professional groups assessing driving fitness. We prepared an aid for daily practice on how to examine the minimum medical requirements for visual function listed in the TLO Annex 1, using standardized test procedures and considered how to interpret the findings obtained, accounting for aspects of traffic medicine and ophthalmology.

CONCLUSIONS

A consensus on the assessment of visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland is crucial to ensure legal equality for drivers and legal certainty for examiners. Regular review of the consensus is imperative if we are to consider future legal developments and new scientific evidence in assessing fitness to drive.

摘要

目的

就瑞士驾驶适宜性视觉功能评估达成全国共识。

方法

瑞士联邦法律,即《交通许可条例》(TLO)规定了驾驶适宜性视觉功能的最低医学要求。但其中未进一步明确在此背景下相关的医学检查技术及其评估方法,这导致驾驶员之间存在法律不平等,检查人员也存在不确定性。我们成立了一个研究小组,成员包括瑞士法医学会交通医学分会和瑞士眼科学会交通委员会的代表,旨在就瑞士驾驶适宜性视觉功能评估达成全国共识。在结构化会议中,作者们参照瑞士立法,讨论了医学检查技术以及关于该主题的国际和本地现有建议。如有不同意见,会在后续会议中再次讨论该主题,直至达成一致。我们将共识定义为对所讨论主题的完全认同。

结果

研究小组在2019年3月至2023年1月期间举行了五次面对面会议。作者们制定了适用于所有评估驾驶适宜性的专业群体的建议。我们编写了一份日常实践辅助材料,介绍如何使用标准化测试程序检查TLO附件1中列出的视觉功能最低医学要求,并考虑如何解读所得结果,同时兼顾交通医学和眼科学方面的因素。

结论

就瑞士驾驶适宜性视觉功能评估达成共识对于确保驾驶员的法律平等和检查人员的法律确定性至关重要。如果我们要在评估驾驶适宜性时考虑未来的法律发展和新的科学证据,就必须定期审查该共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/bbb205a520a4/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/69e9e747bd08/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/a34b90615404/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/6676ac8e53db/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/bbb205a520a4/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/69e9e747bd08/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/a34b90615404/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/6676ac8e53db/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307c/12020669/bbb205a520a4/10-1055-a-2479-9305-i0458kl04.jpg

相似文献

1
National Consensus on the Assessment of Visual Function for Driving in Switzerland.瑞士驾驶视觉功能评估全国共识
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Apr;242(4):507-514. doi: 10.1055/a-2479-9305. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
[Requirements on vision for driving: to see more clearly].[驾驶视力要求:看得更清楚]
Rev Med Suisse. 2014 Nov 26;10(452):2252-4, 2256-7.
3
Fitness-to-drive for glioblastoma patients: Guidance from the Swiss Neuro-Oncology Society (SwissNOS) and the Swiss Society for Legal Medicine (SGRM).驾驶能力评估适用于胶质母细胞瘤患者:瑞士神经肿瘤学会(SwissNOS)和瑞士法医学学会(SGRM)的指导意见。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 May 16;151:w20501. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20501. eCollection 2021 May 10.
4
Visual function and fitness to drive.视觉功能与驾驶适宜性。
Br Med Bull. 2008;87:163-74. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn028. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
5
[Fitness to drive under traffic ophthalmological aspects in elderly drivers].
Ther Umsch. 2016;73(2):91-7. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000762.
6
Visual attention outperforms visual-perceptual parameters required by law as an indicator of on-road driving performance.视觉注意力优于法律规定的视觉感知参数,可作为道路行驶表现的指标。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0236147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236147. eCollection 2020.
7
Driving blind - Should tests of visual function be mandatory for driving license?盲目驾驶——视觉功能测试应成为驾照考试的强制项目吗?
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;67(2):193-194. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_150_19.
8
[Checking the fitness to drive of senior citizens under German law-pending corrective measures to ensure road safety].[根据德国法律检查老年人的驾驶适宜性——等待确保道路安全的纠正措施]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Aug;67(8):862-868. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03911-8. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
[The role of CARA for assessment of visual problems].[CARA在视觉问题评估中的作用]
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2004(291):17-20.
10
[Statutory basis and legal aspects of evaluating a person's aptitude to drive].
Ther Umsch. 2011 May;68(5):231-3. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000156.

本文引用的文献

1
National application of the European visual field standards for driving: a survey study.国家对欧洲驾驶视野标准的应用:一项调查研究。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 23;7(1):e000904. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000904. eCollection 2022.
2
Consensus development methods: Considerations for national and global frameworks and policy development.共识开发方法:国家和全球框架及政策开发的考虑因素。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2222-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Population ageing and mortality during 1990-2017: A global decomposition analysis.
1990-2017 年人口老龄化和死亡率:全球分解分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jun 8;17(6):e1003138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003138. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Differences in Static and Kinetic Perimetry Results are Eliminated in Retinal Disease when Psychophysical Procedures are Equated.当心理物理学程序相同时,视网膜疾病中静态和动态视野检查结果的差异会被消除。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 1;7(5):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.22. eCollection 2018 Sep.
5
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research.在医学教育研究中使用德尔菲法和名义群体法等共识小组方法。
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
6
Clinical Consensus Statement Development Manual.临床共识声明制定手册。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;153(2 Suppl):S1-S14. doi: 10.1177/0194599815601394.
7
A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring.一项关于患者对青光眼监测视野测试看法的定性调查。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 10;4(1):e003996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003996.
8
Macaque ganglion cells and spatial vision.
Prog Brain Res. 1993;95:33-43. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60355-6.
9
Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways. A reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon.视觉前通路病变中的静态与动态分离。对里多克现象的重新评估。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Feb;98(2):291-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030287009.
10
Assessment of physiologic statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry.通过自动视野计评估生理状态-运动分离。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Oct;33(11):3162-8.