• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估列联表基于理论假设的AIC型信息准则。

An AIC-type information criterion evaluating theory-based hypotheses for contingency tables.

作者信息

Altinisik Yasin, Hessels Roy S, Van Lissa Caspar J, Kuiper Rebecca M

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Sinop University, Osmaniye Mahallesi, Selanik Caddesi (Kuzey Kampüs), No:52G, 57000, Sinop, Türkiye.

Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):70. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02570-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02570-6
PMID:39843725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11754365/
Abstract

Researchers face inevitable difficulties when evaluating theory-based hypotheses in the context of contingency tables. Log-linear models are often insufficient to evaluate such hypotheses, as they do not provide enough information on complex relationships between cell probabilities in many real-life applications. These models are usually used to evaluate the relationships between variables using only equality restrictions between model parameters, while specifying theory-based hypotheses often also requires inequality restrictions. Moreover, high-dimensional contingency tables generally contain low cell counts and/or empty cells, complicating parameter estimation in log-linear models. The presence of many parameters in these models also causes difficulties in interpretation when evaluating the hypotheses of interest. This study proposes a method that simplifies evaluating theory-based hypotheses for high-dimensional contingency tables by simultaneously addressing each of the above problems. With this method, theory-based hypotheses, which are specified using equality and/or inequality constraints with respect to (functions of) cell probabilities, are evaluated using an AIC-type information criterion, GORICA. We conduct a simulation study to evaluate the performance of GORICA in the context of contingency tables. Two empirical examples illustrate the use of the method.

摘要

在列联表的背景下评估基于理论的假设时,研究人员面临不可避免的困难。对数线性模型往往不足以评估此类假设,因为在许多实际应用中,它们无法提供足够的关于单元格概率之间复杂关系的信息。这些模型通常仅使用模型参数之间的等式约束来评估变量之间的关系,而指定基于理论的假设通常还需要不等式约束。此外,高维列联表通常包含低单元格计数和/或空单元格,这使得对数线性模型中的参数估计变得复杂。这些模型中存在许多参数,在评估感兴趣的假设时也会导致解释困难。本研究提出了一种方法,通过同时解决上述每个问题,简化对高维列联表基于理论的假设的评估。使用这种方法,使用关于单元格概率(的函数)的等式和/或不等式约束指定的基于理论的假设,通过AIC型信息准则GORICA进行评估。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以评估GORICA在列联表背景下的性能。两个实证例子说明了该方法的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/092f2bf905a5/13428_2024_2570_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/f39a8323ba6d/13428_2024_2570_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/46892ae076c1/13428_2024_2570_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/cf2c45fd0ad8/13428_2024_2570_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/d37e3fb0acf1/13428_2024_2570_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/208c957be3fc/13428_2024_2570_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/092f2bf905a5/13428_2024_2570_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/f39a8323ba6d/13428_2024_2570_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/46892ae076c1/13428_2024_2570_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/cf2c45fd0ad8/13428_2024_2570_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/d37e3fb0acf1/13428_2024_2570_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/208c957be3fc/13428_2024_2570_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc1/11754365/092f2bf905a5/13428_2024_2570_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An AIC-type information criterion evaluating theory-based hypotheses for contingency tables.一种用于评估列联表基于理论假设的AIC型信息准则。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):70. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02570-6.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Plug-and-play use of tree-based methods: consequences for clinical prediction modeling.基于树的方法的即插即用:对临床预测模型的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;184:111834. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111834. Epub 2025 May 19.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.使用 AIC 的推广来评估具有不等式约束的假设。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Oct;26(5):599-621. doi: 10.1037/met0000406.
2
How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.注视面部如何支持面对面互动?综述与展望。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):856-881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01715-w.
3
Evaluating a theory-based hypothesis against its complement using an AIC-type information criterion with an application to facial burn injury.
使用 AIC 类信息准则评估基于理论的假设与其互补假设,并将其应用于面部烧伤。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Apr;25(2):129-142. doi: 10.1037/met0000238. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.二元互动过程中对脸部的注视行为。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):226-242. doi: 10.1037/cep0000113. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables.贝叶斯评价列联表的不等式和等式约束假设。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):281-99. doi: 10.1037/a0020137.