Schmid Lena, Roidl Moritz, Kirchheim Alice, Pauly Markus
Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Chair of Material Handling and Warehousing, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;27(1):25. doi: 10.3390/e27010025.
Many planning and decision activities in logistics and supply chain management are based on forecasts of multiple time dependent factors. Therefore, the quality of planning depends on the quality of the forecasts. We compare different state-of-the-art forecasting methods in terms of forecasting performance. Differently from most existing research in logistics, we do not perform this in a case-dependent way but consider a broad set of simulated time series to give more general recommendations. We therefore simulate various linear and nonlinear time series that reflect different situations. Our simulation results showed that the machine learning methods, especially Random Forests, performed particularly well in complex scenarios, with the differentiated time series training significantly improving the robustness of the model. In addition, the time series approaches proved to be competitive in low noise scenarios.
物流与供应链管理中的许多规划和决策活动都基于对多个时间相关因素的预测。因此,规划的质量取决于预测的质量。我们在预测性能方面比较了不同的先进预测方法。与物流领域的大多数现有研究不同,我们不是以依赖具体案例的方式进行比较,而是考虑一组广泛的模拟时间序列以给出更具普遍性的建议。因此,我们模拟了反映不同情况的各种线性和非线性时间序列。我们的模拟结果表明,机器学习方法,尤其是随机森林,在复杂场景中表现特别出色,差异化的时间序列训练显著提高了模型的稳健性。此外,时间序列方法在低噪声场景中也具有竞争力。