Ramudingana Phathutshedzo, Makhado Ndivhuho, Kamutando Casper Nyaradzai, Thantsha Mapitsi Silvester, Mamphogoro Tshifhiwa Paris
Gastro-Intestinal Microbiology and Biotechnology Unit, Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production, Private Bag X02, Irene, Pretoria 0062, South Africa.
Department of Microbiological Pathology, Tuberculosis Research Unit, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Molotlegi Road, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0204, South Africa.
J Fungi (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;11(1):82. doi: 10.3390/jof11010082.
Postharvest decay of vegetables and fruits presents a significant threat confronting sustainable food production worldwide, and in the recent times, applying synthetic fungicides has become the most popular technique of managing postharvest losses. However, there are concerns and reported proofs of hazardous impacts on consumers' health and the environment, traceable to the application of chemical treatments as preservatives on fresh produce. Physical methods, on the other hand, cause damage to fresh produce, exposing it to even more infections. Therefore, healthier and more environmentally friendly alternatives to existing methods for managing postharvest decays of fresh produce should be advocated. There is increasing consensus that utilization of biological control agents (BCAs), mainly fungi, represents a more sustainable and effective strategy for controlling postharvest losses compared to physical and chemical treatments. Secretion of antifungal compounds, parasitism, as well as competition for nutrients and space are the most common antagonistic mechanisms employed by these BCAs. This article provides an overview of (i) the methods currently used for management of postharvest diseases of fresh produce, highlighting their limitations, and (ii) the use of biocontrol agents as an alternative strategy for control of such diseases, with emphasis on fungal antagonists, their mode of action, and, more importantly, their advantages when compared to other methods commonly used. We therefore hypothesize that the use of fungal antagonists for prevention of postharvest loss of fresh produce is more effective compared to physical and chemical methods. Finally, particular attention is given to the gaps observed in establishing beneficial microbes as BCAs and factors that hamper their development, particularly in terms of shelf life, efficacy, commercialization, and legislation procedures.
蔬菜水果的采后腐烂对全球可持续粮食生产构成重大威胁,近年来,使用合成杀菌剂已成为控制采后损失最常用的技术。然而,由于在新鲜农产品上使用化学处理剂作为防腐剂,人们对其对消费者健康和环境的有害影响表示担忧并有相关报道证明。另一方面,物理方法会对新鲜农产品造成损害,使其更容易受到感染。因此,应提倡采用更健康、更环保的替代方法来管理新鲜农产品的采后腐烂。越来越多的人达成共识,与物理和化学处理相比,利用生物防治剂(主要是真菌)是控制采后损失更可持续、更有效的策略。这些生物防治剂最常见的拮抗机制包括分泌抗真菌化合物、寄生以及对营养和空间的竞争。本文概述了:(i)目前用于管理新鲜农产品采后病害的方法,强调其局限性;(ii)使用生物防治剂作为控制此类病害的替代策略,重点介绍真菌拮抗剂、它们的作用方式,更重要的是,与其他常用方法相比它们的优势。因此,我们假设与物理和化学方法相比,使用真菌拮抗剂预防新鲜农产品的采后损失更有效。最后,特别关注在将有益微生物确立为生物防治剂方面存在的差距以及阻碍其发展的因素,特别是在保质期、功效、商业化和立法程序方面。