Suppr超能文献

L.和L.不同形态部分的营养、化学、抗氧化和抗菌筛选

Nutritional, Chemical, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Screening of L. and L. Different Morphological Parts.

作者信息

Shahrivari-Baviloliaei Saba, Konopacka Agnieszka, Pascoalino Liege Aguiar, Reis Filipa, Kunkowski Dawid, Petropoulos Spyridon A, Konieczynski Pawel, Orhan Ilkay Erdogan, Plenis Alina, Viapiana Agnieszka

机构信息

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 Jan 14;14(2):250. doi: 10.3390/foods14020250.

Abstract

The chemical composition and biological activity of and are scarcely investigated. In this study, the nutritional and chemical profiles of and , considering their different morphological parts (leaves, fruits and roots), were assessed together with their antioxidant and antibacterial potential. Our results showed that carbohydrates are the major macronutrients in both species (above 62 g/100 g dry weight-DW). High amounts of ash (above 4.6 g/100 g DW) and protein (above 13.0 g/100 g DW) were also identified, particularly in leaves and fruits of and . Moreover, was richer in sugars than , while roots of both species were the richest of fatty acids. Ten phenolic compounds were identified, with gallic acid and quercetin being predominant, above 49.84 and 37.27 μg/g DW, respectively. The mineral analysis revealed zinc and iron as the major constituents. Regarding the plants' antioxidant and antibacterial activity, both species had antioxidant potential, and their water extracts showed antibacterial activity against and . Altogether, these results provide insight into the potential of and as a source of nutritional benefits and active phytochemicals for many people, and they can be applied in the food sector as foods and as promising sources of natural ingredients.

摘要

对[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]的化学成分和生物活性研究甚少。在本研究中,综合评估了[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]不同形态部分(叶、果实和根)的营养和化学特征,以及它们的抗氧化和抗菌潜力。我们的结果表明,碳水化合物是这两种植物中的主要常量营养素(干重超过62克/100克)。还鉴定出大量的灰分(超过4.6克/100克干重)和蛋白质(超过13.0克/100克干重),特别是在[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]的叶和果实中。此外,[植物名称1]比[植物名称2]富含更多的糖,而这两种植物的根中脂肪酸含量最高。鉴定出十种酚类化合物,其中没食子酸和槲皮素占主导,分别高于49.84和37.27微克/克干重。矿物质分析表明锌和铁是主要成分。关于植物的抗氧化和抗菌活性,这两种植物都具有抗氧化潜力,其水提取物对[细菌名称1]和[细菌名称2]具有抗菌活性。总之,这些结果为[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]作为许多人的营养益处和活性植物化学物质来源的潜力提供了见解,它们可作为食品以及有前景的天然成分来源应用于食品行业。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验