• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于重症监护病房病情恶化早期实时预测的机器学习模型——一种早期识别高危患者的新方法

Machine Learning Models for the Early Real-Time Prediction of Deterioration in Intensive Care Units-A Novel Approach to the Early Identification of High-Risk Patients.

作者信息

Thiele Dominik, Rodseth Reitze, Friedland Richard, Berger Fabian, Mathew Chris, Maslo Caroline, Moll Vanessa, Leithner Christoph, Storm Christian, Krannich Alexander, Nee Jens

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

TCC Analytics, Telehealth Competence Center (TCC) GmbH, 22083 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 8;14(2):350. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020350.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14020350
PMID:39860355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11766095/
Abstract

Predictive machine learning models have made use of a variety of scoring systems to identify clinical deterioration in ICU patients. However, most of these scores include variables that are dependent on medical staff examining the patient. We present the development of a real-time prediction model using clinical variables that are digital and automatically generated for the early detection of patients at risk of deterioration. Routine monitoring data were used in this analysis. ICU patients with at least 24 h of vital sign recordings were included. Deterioration was defined as qSOFA ≥ 2. Model development and validation were performed internally by splitting the cohort into training and test datasets and validating the results on the test dataset. Five different models were trained, tested, and compared against each other. The models were an artificial neural network (ANN), a random forest (RF), a support vector machine (SVM), a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and a logistic regression (LR). In total, 7156 ICU patients were screened for inclusion in the study, which resulted in models trained from a total of 28,348 longitudinal measurements. The artificial neural network showed a superior predictive performance for deterioration, with an area under the curve of 0.81 over 0.78 (RF), 0.78 (SVM), 0.77 (LDA), and 0.76 (LR), by using only four vital parameters. The sensitivity was higher than the specificity for the artificial neural network. The artificial neural network, only using four automatically recorded vital signs, was best able to predict deterioration, 10 h before documentation in clinical records. This real-time prediction model has the potential to flag at-risk patients to the healthcare providers treating them, for closer monitoring and further investigation.

摘要

预测性机器学习模型已利用各种评分系统来识别重症监护病房(ICU)患者的临床病情恶化情况。然而,这些评分大多包含依赖医护人员对患者进行检查的变量。我们提出了一种使用数字化且自动生成的临床变量的实时预测模型,用于早期检测有病情恶化风险的患者。本分析使用了常规监测数据。纳入了至少有24小时生命体征记录的ICU患者。病情恶化定义为快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)≥2。通过将队列分为训练数据集和测试数据集,并在测试数据集上验证结果,在内部进行模型开发和验证。训练、测试并相互比较了五种不同的模型。这些模型分别是人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、线性判别分析(LDA)和逻辑回归(LR)。总共筛选了7156名ICU患者纳入研究,由此从总共28348次纵向测量数据中训练模型。人工神经网络在病情恶化预测方面表现出卓越的性能,仅使用四个生命参数时,其曲线下面积为0.81,高于随机森林(0.78)、支持向量机(0.78)、线性判别分析(0.77)和逻辑回归(0.76)。人工神经网络的灵敏度高于特异性。仅使用四个自动记录的生命体征时,人工神经网络最能在临床记录记录前10小时预测病情恶化。这种实时预测模型有潜力向治疗这些患者的医护人员标记有风险的患者,以便进行更密切的监测和进一步调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/fd5e5e77dfac/jcm-14-00350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/f16ec163f7cc/jcm-14-00350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/dfabd47cd153/jcm-14-00350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/c8ff088a69b5/jcm-14-00350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/fd5e5e77dfac/jcm-14-00350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/f16ec163f7cc/jcm-14-00350-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/dfabd47cd153/jcm-14-00350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/c8ff088a69b5/jcm-14-00350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81eb/11766095/fd5e5e77dfac/jcm-14-00350-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Models for the Early Real-Time Prediction of Deterioration in Intensive Care Units-A Novel Approach to the Early Identification of High-Risk Patients.用于重症监护病房病情恶化早期实时预测的机器学习模型——一种早期识别高危患者的新方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 8;14(2):350. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020350.
2
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
3
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
4
Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.机器学习能预测药物治疗效果吗?一项在骨质疏松症中的应用研究。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107028. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107028. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
6
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a case-control study.用于预测慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌风险的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项病例对照研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03697-2.
7
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU.用于预测ICU中缺血性中风患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jun;198:105874. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105874. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
8
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Delirium in Intensive Care Units Using Continuous Physiological Data: Retrospective Study.使用连续生理数据的重症监护病房谵妄早期预测机器学习模型的开发与验证:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 2;27:e59520. doi: 10.2196/59520.
9
Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19大流行期间临床护理中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2833-2850. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Establishment and validation of an interactive artificial intelligence platform to predict postoperative ambulatory status for patients with metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter analysis.建立和验证交互式人工智能平台,以预测转移性脊柱疾病患者的术后活动状态:一项多中心分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2738-2756. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001169.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Severity of Illness Scores and Artificial Intelligence Models That Are Predictive of Intensive Care Unit Mortality: Meta-analysis and Review of the Literature.预测重症监护病房死亡率的疾病严重程度评分与人工智能模型的比较:荟萃分析与文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 31;10(5):e35293. doi: 10.2196/35293.
2
Mortality prediction of patients in intensive care units using machine learning algorithms based on electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的机器学习算法对重症监护病房患者的死亡率预测。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 3;12(1):7180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11226-4.
3
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.
拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习对重症监护病房中的脓毒症进行早期预测:一项系统综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 28;8:607952. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.607952. eCollection 2021.
5
A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care.基于时相的机器学习模型对重症监护中脓毒症的实时预测
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884-e888. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004494.
6
Early Detection of In-Patient Deterioration: One Prediction Model Does Not Fit All.住院患者病情恶化的早期检测:一种预测模型并不适用于所有情况。
Crit Care Explor. 2020 May 11;2(5):e0116. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000116. eCollection 2020 May.
7
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Critical Transitions in Intensive Care Units: A Sepsis Case Study.重症监护病房的关键转折点:脓毒症案例研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 9;9(1):12888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49006-2.
9
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.一种用于预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的机器学习算法:开发、实施及其对临床实践的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1485-1492. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003891.
10
Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning-Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.临床医生对基于机器学习的早期预警系统预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的看法。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1477-1484. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003803.