Dong Shuaibing, Sun Ying, Feng Zhaomin, Tian Yi, Jia Lei, Wang Xiaoli, Wang Quanyi, Zhang Daitao, Yang Peng
Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Beijing 100013, China.
Viruses. 2024 Dec 28;17(1):31. doi: 10.3390/v17010031.
The present study aimed to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of different doses of an inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine against Omicron BA.2.2 infection in Beijing, China, 2022. Based on data from a previous cohabitation retrospective cohort of COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing, China, 2022, the cohabitating contacts of individuals with BA.2.2 infection were followed up. Using a log-binomial regression model in which the unvaccinated group as the control group, the risk ratios of different doses of inactivated vaccine in terms of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptoms of COVID-19, and pneumonia were calculated, and the protective effect of the vaccine was estimated. The Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test was used to compare the effect of vaccination on the viral load of infected patients. From April to June 2022, a total of 2259 cohabiting close contacts of 1308 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection aged ≥3 years were included. Of the included close contacts, 737 (32.63%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the isolation period: 140 (19.00%) were infected but asymptomatic, 525 (71.23%) had mild infection, and 72 (9.77%) had pneumonia. There were no cases of severe or critical infection or death. The VE of the primary in preventing BA.2.2 infection, symptoms, and pneumonia was 37.35% (95% CI: 24.00-48.35), 42.36% (95% CI: 28.41-53.60), and 48.35% (95% CI: -5.34-74.67), respectively. The VE of the booster shot in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptoms, and pneumonia was 37.08% (95% CI: 24.29-47.70), 44.38% (95% CI: 31.45-54.87), and 61.46% (95% CI: 29.79-78.85), respectively. Six months after the booster vaccination, the VE of the booster in terms of preventing SARS-CoV-2 remained above 46%, and its VE in terms of the prevention of pneumonia remained above 72%. In the unvaccinated group, the Ct values of the N gene and ORFlab gene (represented by the median value and Q1 and Q3 in parentheses) were 26.45 (21.09, 31.61) and 28.06 (22.21, 32.06), respectively. There was no significant difference in the median value of either gene between the unvaccinated group, the partial group [25.81 (19.91, 31.78) and 26.98 (21.63, 31.17)], the primary group [28.79 (22.08, 32.34) and 29.30 (23.81, 33.86)], and the booster group [26.23 (21.66, 31.46) and 27.73 (23.38, 32.52)] ( > 0.05). Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines provided a certain level protection from infection and symptoms, very good protection against pneumonia, and it still has a modest protective effect at 6 months after vaccination. Booster doses are necessary to provide strongest protection. However, irrespective of their vaccination status, individuals with COVID-19 have a similar viral load.
本研究旨在评估2022年中国北京不同剂量的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)灭活疫苗针对奥密克戎BA.2.2感染的疫苗效力(VE)。基于2022年中国北京之前一次COVID-19疫情同居回顾性队列的数据,对BA.2.2感染个体的同居接触者进行随访。使用以未接种疫苗组为对照组的对数二项回归模型,计算不同剂量灭活疫苗在预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染、COVID-19症状及肺炎方面的风险比,并估计疫苗的保护效果。采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验比较疫苗接种对感染患者病毒载量的影响。2022年4月至6月,共纳入1308例年龄≥3岁的SARS-CoV-2感染患者的2259名同居密切接触者。在纳入的密切接触者中,737例(32.63%)在隔离期间SARS-CoV-2呈阳性:140例(19.00%)感染但无症状,525例(71.23%)为轻症感染,72例(9.77%)患有肺炎。无重症或危重症感染或死亡病例。基础免疫在预防BA.2.2感染、症状及肺炎方面的疫苗效力分别为37.35%(95%CI:24.00 - 48.35)、42.36%(95%CI:28.41 - 53.60)和48.35%(95%CI: - 5.34 - 74.67)。加强免疫在预防SARS-CoV-2感染、症状及肺炎方面的疫苗效力分别为37.08%(95%CI:24.29 - 47.70)、44.38%(95%CI:31.45 - 54.87)和61.46%(95%CI:29.79 - 78.85)。加强免疫接种6个月后,加强针预防SARS-CoV-2的疫苗效力仍高于46%,预防肺炎的疫苗效力仍高于72%。在未接种疫苗组中,N基因和ORF1ab基因的Ct值(以括号内的中位数及Q1和Q3表示)分别为26.45(21.09,31.61)和28.06(22.21,32.06)。未接种疫苗组、部分接种组[25.81(19.91,31.78)和26.98(21.63,31.17)]、基础免疫组[28.79(22.08,32.34)和29.30(23.81,33.86)]及加强免疫组[26.23(21.66,31.46)和27.73(23.38,32.52)]中任一基因的中位数均无显著差异(>0.05)。COVID-19灭活疫苗提供了一定程度的感染和症状防护、对肺炎的良好防护,且在接种后6个月仍有一定的保护作用。加强剂量对于提供最强保护是必要的。然而,无论其疫苗接种状态如何,COVID-19感染者的病毒载量相似。