Schleider Jessica L, Zapata Juan Pablo, Rapoport Andy, Wescott Annie, Ghosh Arka, Kaveladze Benji, Szkody Erica, Ahuvia Isaac L
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email:
Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2025 May;21(1):279-303. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-025033. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
Most people with mental health needs cannot access treatment; among those who do, many access services only once. Accordingly, single-session interventions (SSIs) may help bridge the treatment gap. We conducted the first umbrella review synthesizing research on SSIs for mental health problems and service engagement in youth and adults. Our search yielded 24 systematic reviews of SSIs, which included 415 unique trials. Twenty reviews (83.33%) reported significant, positive effects of SSIs for one or more outcomes (anxiety, depression, externalizing problems, eating problems, substance use, treatment engagement or uptake). Across 12 reviews that meta-analytically examined SSIs' effectiveness relative to controls, SSIs showed a positive effect across outcomes and age groups (standardized mean difference = -0.25, 2 = 43.17%). Per AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews), some methodological concerns emerged across reviews, such as low rates of preregistration. Overall, findings support the clinical utility of SSIs for certain psychological problems and populations. Implementation research is needed to integrate effective SSIs into systems of care.
大多数有心理健康需求的人无法获得治疗;在那些能够获得治疗的人中,许多人也只是接受过一次服务。因此,单节干预(SSIs)可能有助于缩小治疗差距。我们进行了首次伞状综述,综合了关于青少年和成年人心理健康问题及服务参与的单节干预研究。我们的检索产生了24项关于单节干预的系统综述,其中包括415项独特的试验。20项综述(83.33%)报告了单节干预对一种或多种结果(焦虑、抑郁、外化问题、饮食问题、物质使用、治疗参与或接受)有显著的积极影响。在12项通过荟萃分析检验单节干预相对于对照组有效性的综述中,单节干预在各结果和年龄组中均显示出积极效果(标准化均值差=-0.25,I²=43.17%)。根据AMSTAR 2(一种评估系统综述的测量工具),各综述中出现了一些方法学问题,如预注册率低。总体而言,研究结果支持单节干预对某些心理问题和人群的临床效用。需要开展实施研究,将有效的单节干预纳入护理系统。