• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对流动人群中艾滋病毒治疗流程的数字健康干预措施在多大程度上可行、可接受且有效?一项混合方法系统评价方案。

To what extent are digital health interventions targeting HIV care cascade among mobile populations feasible, acceptable, and effective? A mixed methods systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Mathenjwa Thulile, Malila Bessie, Knight Lucia, Tanser Frank, Makwambeni Patricia, Phillips Tamsin K

机构信息

Africa Health Research Institute, Krith building level 3, 719 Umbilo rd, Durban, 4001, South Africa.

Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02747-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02747-2
PMID:39875963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773803/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Human mobility is associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition and disengagement from HIV care, leading to poorer health outcomes among highly mobile individuals compared to less mobile individuals. Mobile individuals, broadly defined as those who temporally, seasonally, or permanently move from one place to another for voluntary or involuntary reasons, face many challenges in accessing HIV care services. These challenges include logistical difficulties, interruptions in HIV care continuity, and limited access to services across different locations, which together hinder timely testing, treatment initiation, and viral suppression. Digital health interventions offer flexible approaches that can adjust to the mobile individual's location to improve HIV care engagement and health outcomes for this underserved and hard-to-reach population. However, evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of digital health interventions across the HIV care cascade among mobile populations has not yet been appraised.

OBJECTIVES

We seek to synthesize empirical evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of digital health interventions targeting the HIV care cascade among mobile populations.

METHODS

We will conduct a mixed methods systematic review of peer reviewed studies published between 1 January 2010 and 31 July 2024 that evaluated digital health interventions targeting the HIV care cascade among mobile populations. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide information, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles) electronic databases. Bibliographies of retrieved studies will also be reviewed for relevant citations. Only studies published in English language and involved a digital health intervention, report an outcome related to the HIV care cascade, and involve mobile populations either partially or completely will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria, followed by full text screening for eligible articles. In case of disagreements, consensus will be sought from a third reviewer. Data synthesis will follow the Joanne Briggs Institute's convergent segregated approach. If sufficient quantitative studies with comparable outcome measures are available, a meta-analysis will be performed.

DISCUSSION

This review will address a critical evidence gap by consolidating data on digital health interventions' feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy across the HIV care cascade among mobile populations. The results will inform the development of tailored digital health interventions to enhance HIV care delivery and health outcomes for this hard-to-reach population, supporting global HIV prevention and treatment goals.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024528122).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6f/11773803/eb016bbda4aa/13643_2024_2747_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6f/11773803/eb016bbda4aa/13643_2024_2747_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f6f/11773803/eb016bbda4aa/13643_2024_2747_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

引言

人员流动与感染艾滋病毒的风险增加以及脱离艾滋病毒护理相关,导致流动性高的个体相比流动性较低的个体健康结果更差。流动个体广义上指那些因自愿或非自愿原因在时间上、季节上或永久地从一个地方搬到另一个地方的人,他们在获得艾滋病毒护理服务方面面临许多挑战。这些挑战包括后勤困难、艾滋病毒护理连续性中断以及不同地点服务获取受限,这些因素共同阻碍了及时检测、开始治疗和病毒抑制。数字健康干预提供了灵活的方法,可以根据流动个体的位置进行调整,以改善这一服务不足且难以接触到的人群的艾滋病毒护理参与度和健康结果。然而,关于数字健康干预在流动人群艾滋病毒护理连续过程中的可行性、可接受性和有效性的证据尚未得到评估。

目的

我们旨在综合关于针对流动人群艾滋病毒护理连续过程的数字健康干预的可行性、可接受性和有效性的实证证据。

方法

我们将对2010年1月1日至2024年7月31日期间发表的同行评审研究进行混合方法系统评价,这些研究评估了针对流动人群艾滋病毒护理连续过程的数字健康干预。我们将检索PubMed、科学网和EBSCOhost(学术搜索高级版、非洲范围信息、护理学与健康领域数据库、健康资源:护理/学术版、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库、美国心理学会心理学全文数据库)电子数据库。还将审查检索到的研究的参考文献以获取相关引用。仅纳入以英文发表、涉及数字健康干预、报告与艾滋病毒护理连续过程相关的结果且部分或完全涉及流动人群的研究。两名评审员将根据纳入标准独立筛选标题和摘要,随后对符合条件的文章进行全文筛选。如有分歧,将寻求第三位评审员的共识。数据综合将遵循乔安妮·布里格斯研究所的收敛性分离方法。如果有足够数量具有可比结果测量的定量研究,将进行荟萃分析。

讨论

本综述将通过整合关于数字健康干预在流动人群艾滋病毒护理连续过程中的可行性、可接受性和有效性的数据,填补关键的证据空白。研究结果将为制定量身定制的数字健康干预措施提供信息,以加强对这一难以接触到的人群的艾滋病毒护理服务提供和健康结果,支持全球艾滋病毒预防和治疗目标。

系统评价注册

本方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42024528122)上注册。

相似文献

1
To what extent are digital health interventions targeting HIV care cascade among mobile populations feasible, acceptable, and effective? A mixed methods systematic review protocol.针对流动人群中艾滋病毒治疗流程的数字健康干预措施在多大程度上可行、可接受且有效?一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02747-2.
2
Interventions to Maintain HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Service Delivery During Public Health Emergencies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.中低收入国家突发公共卫生事件期间维持艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾服务提供的干预措施:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 15;14:e64316. doi: 10.2196/64316.
3
Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review.让认知障碍老年人参与数字健康技术:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 3;14:e65515. doi: 10.2196/65515.
4
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
9
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
10
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to healthy ınformatıon: the ınteractıon of medıa lıteracy and health lıteracy.获取健康信息:媒体素养与健康素养的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):2800. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24022-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Making sense of uncertainty: The precarious lives of young migrants from rural Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.理解不确定性:南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省农村青年移民的脆弱生活。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2229895. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2229895.
2
Mobility and ART retention among men in Malawi: a mixed-methods study. Malawi 男性的流动性和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)保留率:一项混合方法研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Mar;26(3):e26066. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26066.
3
Mobility and HIV care engagement: a research agenda.流动性与艾滋病毒护理参与:研究议程。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Mar;26(3):e26058. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26058.
4
Addressing the migrant gap: maternal healthcare perspectives on utilising prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) services during the COVID-19 pandemic, South Africa.解决移民差距问题:南非利用预防母婴传播(PMTCT)服务应对 COVID-19 大流行的孕产妇保健观点。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2100602. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2100602.
5
JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI.JBI系列论文2:需要采用量身定制的证据综合方法来回答各种问题:来自JBI的实用证据综合工具包。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
The potential impact of country-level migration networks on HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Botswana.国家层面的移民网络对撒哈拉以南非洲国家 HIV 疫情的潜在影响:以博茨瓦纳为例。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Dec;8(12):e787-e792. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00267-8. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指导。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Jun 1;19(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000282.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Digital technology to address HIV and other sexually transmitted infection disparities: Intentions to disclose online personal health records to sex partners among students at a historically Black college.数字技术解决 HIV 和其他性传播感染的差异:历史上的黑人学院学生向性伴侣在线披露个人健康记录的意愿。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237648. eCollection 2020.
10
Peer Group Focused eHealth Strategies to Promote HIV Prevention, Testing, and Care Engagement.同伴群体为中心的电子健康策略促进艾滋病毒预防、检测和治疗参与。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020 Oct;17(5):557-576. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00527-w.