• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理性食物卷入量表的土耳其语效度和信度研究:PFIS-TR

Turkish validity and reliability study of the psychological food involvement scale: PFIS-TR.

作者信息

Şahin İrem Nur, Atar Aslıhan, Yaman Özge, Pulat Demir Halime

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02413-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02413-9
PMID:39881412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11776226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to adapt the Psychological Food Involvement Scale (PFIS) to Turkish culture and test its validity and reliability. The PFIS measures individuals' psychological, emotional, and social relationships with food, which significantly impact eating behaviors and health.

METHODS

The study was conducted with 478 participants aged 18-65. The PFIS underwent a six-stage translation and cultural adaptation process. Data collection was carried out via Google Forms, with participants completing a general information form, PFIS, and the Addiction-like Eating Behavior Scale (ALEBS). Reliability was assessed using the test-retest method. SPSS 24 was used for statistical evaluation, including internal consistency coefficient calculations, factor analysis, and correlation tests.

RESULTS

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.94, indicating an adequate sample size, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (p < 0.05). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure explaining 79% of the variance, with factor loadings > 0.40 and eigenvalues > 1. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices: χ2 /sd = 2.28, GFI = 0.95, AGFI = 0.93 CFI = 0.98, NFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.04). Internal consistency analysis showed high reliability, with Cronbach's Alpha coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 across subscales.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the PFIS was found to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychological food involvement in the studied sample of the Turkish adult population.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在使心理性食物卷入量表(PFIS)适用于土耳其文化,并检验其有效性和可靠性。PFIS 测量个体与食物的心理、情感和社会关系,这些关系对饮食行为和健康有显著影响。

方法

该研究对478名年龄在18至65岁之间的参与者进行。PFIS 经历了六个阶段的翻译和文化适应过程。通过谷歌表单进行数据收集,参与者需完成一份一般信息表、PFIS 和成瘾样饮食行为量表(ALEBS)。使用重测法评估信度。使用 SPSS 24 进行统计评估,包括计算内部一致性系数、因子分析和相关性检验。

结果

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 值为0.94,表明样本量充足,Bartlett 球形检验具有显著性(p < 0.05)。探索性因子分析揭示了一个四因子结构,解释了79%的方差,因子载荷 > 0.40且特征值 > 1。验证性因子分析显示拟合指数良好:χ2 /sd = 2.28,GFI = 0.95,AGFI = 0.93,CFI = 0.98,NFI = 0.94,RMSEA = 0.05,SRMR = 0.04)。内部一致性分析显示信度较高,各分量表的 Cronbach's Alpha 系数在0.86至0.94之间。

结论

发现 PFIS 的土耳其语版本是评估土耳其成年人群体样本中心理性食物卷入的有效且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4382/11776226/f0447f506cb2/40359_2025_2413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4382/11776226/7fbe2e2079e9/40359_2025_2413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4382/11776226/f0447f506cb2/40359_2025_2413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4382/11776226/7fbe2e2079e9/40359_2025_2413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4382/11776226/f0447f506cb2/40359_2025_2413_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Turkish validity and reliability study of the psychological food involvement scale: PFIS-TR.心理性食物卷入量表的土耳其语效度和信度研究:PFIS-TR
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02413-9.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T): A Psychometric Evaluation Among Caregivers.痴呆行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)的效度和信度:护理人员的心理测量学评估
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024;35(4):295-305. doi: 10.5080/u27614.
3
Turkish version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: preliminary results of factorial structure, reliability, and construct validity.耶鲁食物成瘾量表的土耳其语版本:因子结构、信度和结构效度的初步结果。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2019 Dec 10;38(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0202-4.
4
Determining the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Positive Caregiving Experience Scale in Dementia.确定痴呆症患者积极照护体验量表土耳其语版本的心理测量特性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;40(3):e70063. doi: 10.1002/gps.70063.
5
The validity and reliability of the type 2 diabetes and health promotion scale Turkish version: a methodological study.2型糖尿病与健康促进量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度:一项方法学研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar;32(1):417-421. doi: 10.1111/scs.12483. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Psychometric properties of the ORTO-R in an adult population: the Turkish version, reliability, and validity study.成人人群中 ORTO-R 的心理测量学特性:土耳其语版本、信度和效度研究。
Eat Weight Disord. 2024 Nov 24;29(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01705-0.
7
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
8
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
9
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses.护士情境下实施领导力量表土耳其语版的有效性和信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11721-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploration of Food Attitudes and Management of Eating Behavior from a Psycho-Nutritional Perspective.从心理营养视角探索食物态度与饮食行为管理
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;12(19):1934. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191934.
2
A scoping review of emotion regulation and inhibition in emotional eating and binge-eating disorder: what about a continuum?情绪性进食和暴饮暴食障碍中情绪调节与抑制的范围综述:连续体情况如何?
J Eat Disord. 2023 Nov 10;11(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00916-7.
3
Eating Disorders and Addictive Behaviors: Implications for Human Health.
饮食失调和成瘾行为:对人类健康的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 25;15(17):3718. doi: 10.3390/nu15173718.
4
Emotions and Food Consumption: Emotional Eating Behavior in a European Population.情绪与食物消费:欧洲人群中的情绪化饮食行为
Foods. 2023 Feb 17;12(4):872. doi: 10.3390/foods12040872.
5
"Food is more than just a source of nutrients": A qualitative phenomenological study on Food Involvement.“食物不仅仅是营养的来源”:关于食物投入的定性现象学研究。
Appetite. 2022 Nov 1;178:106179. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106179. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
"More than a diet": A qualitative investigation of young vegan Women's relationship to food.“不止是饮食”:一项针对年轻纯素女性与食物关系的定性研究。
Appetite. 2019 Dec 1;143:104418. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104418. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
The development and validation of the Addiction-like Eating Behaviour Scale.《成瘾样进食行为量表的编制与验证》。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Nov;41(11):1710-1717. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.158. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours.社会规范及其对饮食行为的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: development and measurement properties.评估食物量表在肥胖人群和一般个体中的效力:开发和测量特性。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33(8):913-22. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.107. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
10
Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale.耶鲁食物成瘾量表的初步验证
Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.