Hamal Pawan Kumar, Kunwar Surendra, Gautam Kapil, Bhattarai Ramesh, Yadav Rupesh Kumar, Lamsal Ritesh, Singh Radeep, Pathak Sonam, Pokhrel Nabin
National Academy of Medical Sciences, National Trauma Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Consultant Anesthesiologist, Lumbini Provincial Hospital, Butwal, Nepal.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0316950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316950. eCollection 2025.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an evidence-based intervention that saves lives. In low- and middle-income countries like Nepal, the occurrence of the problem and its outcome are seldom studied. The study aims to highlight the prevalence, performance, and outcome of CPR in government hospitals of Nepal.
A mixed method study was done for two months in central and provincial government hospitals of Nepal. A total of 80 resuscitations were evaluated using a questionnaire based on the American Heart Association 2020 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An in-depth interview was conducted with 15 active participants of the resuscitation in different sites. Thematic analysis was done using the framework of the chain of survival of arrest victims.
The overall prevalence of CPR was found to be 1.92% [95% CI: 0.01,0.02] with 5.4% in central hospitals and 0.65% in provincial hospitals with 60% cardiac arrests occurring in the intensive care unit. Estimated time from recognition of the arrest to initiating CPR was 1.9 ±1.4 minutes. Asystole 66.25% was the commonest arrest rhythm and 21.25% had difficulty interpreting rhythm. Only 11.25% of the victims had return of spontaneous circulation and were subsequently transferred for post-arrest care. The qualitative analysis highlighted the lack of trained staff, a dedicated system, feedback mechanism, and provision of post-arrest care.
Across various level of Nepal's healthcare system, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is prevalent with poor performance and outcome. To improve outcomes, it is essential to implement standardized procedures and ensure high quality resuscitation delivery before and after the event supported by well-trained healthcare personnel and adequate infrastructure.
心肺复苏术(CPR)是一种基于证据的挽救生命的干预措施。在尼泊尔等低收入和中等收入国家,很少对该问题的发生情况及其结果进行研究。本研究旨在突出尼泊尔政府医院中心肺复苏术的普及率、实施情况及结果。
在尼泊尔的中央和省级政府医院进行了为期两个月的混合方法研究。根据美国心脏协会2020年心肺复苏指南,使用问卷对总共80次复苏进行了评估。对不同地点的15名复苏积极参与者进行了深入访谈。使用心脏骤停受害者生存链框架进行了主题分析。
发现心肺复苏术的总体普及率为1.92%[95%置信区间:0.01,0.02],中央医院为5.4%,省级医院为0.65%,60%的心脏骤停发生在重症监护病房。从识别心脏骤停到开始心肺复苏术的估计时间为1.9±1.4分钟。心搏停止占66.25%是最常见的心脏骤停节律,21.25%在解读节律方面存在困难。只有11.25%的受害者恢复了自主循环,随后被转送去进行心脏骤停后护理。定性分析突出了缺乏训练有素的工作人员、专门系统、反馈机制以及心脏骤停后护理服务。
在尼泊尔医疗保健系统的各个层面,心肺复苏术普遍存在,但实施情况和结果不佳。为了改善结果,必须实施标准化程序,并确保在事件前后由训练有素的医护人员和充足的基础设施支持下提供高质量的复苏服务。