Suppr超能文献

使用韩语版的“读心术:眼神测试”进行基于眼动追踪的聚类分析。

Eye tracking based clustering using the Korean version of the reading the mind in the eyes test.

作者信息

Koo Se Jun, Cha Eun Jung, Min Jee Eun, Seo Eunchong, Lee Eun, An Suk Kyoon

机构信息

Section of Self, Affect and Neuroscience, Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88483-6.

Abstract

This study applies eye-tracking paradigms to cluster data based on participants' gaze patterns, while performing the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test, and to investigate whether there were differences in the neurocognitive and other Theory of Mind (ToM) tests among the classified clusters. A total of 89 (50 males) non-clinical youths were recruited. The k-means algorithm was adopted, and the optimised number of clusters was determined using the elbow, silhouette and NbClust methods. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was employed to determine whether there were differences among the clusters in the neurocognitive and other ToM tests. Four clusters were proposed based on the index used to estimate the optimised cluster. The long word fixation time cluster had significantly more total errors and fewer categories completed in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, lower backward Digit Span score, and lower sequencing scores in the Theory of Mind Picture Stories Task than in the other clusters. The main findings suggested that even when performing a perceptual-level ToM task that requires the ability to understand mental states, at least in some individuals, gaze patterns are related to neurocognitive strategies, especially executive function, rather than to the specific social cognitive function itself.

摘要

本研究运用眼动追踪范式,在进行韩国版的“读心术眼测试”时,根据参与者的注视模式对数据进行聚类,并调查在分类后的聚类中,神经认知和其他心理理论(ToM)测试是否存在差异。共招募了89名(50名男性)非临床青年。采用k均值算法,并使用肘部法、轮廓法和NbClust法确定优化的聚类数量。此外,采用多变量分析来确定聚类在神经认知和其他ToM测试中是否存在差异。根据用于估计优化聚类的指标,提出了四个聚类。与其他聚类相比,长单词注视时间聚类在威斯康星卡片分类测试中总错误显著更多、完成的类别更少,在心理理论图片故事任务中的倒背数字广度得分更低、排序得分更低。主要研究结果表明,即使在执行需要理解心理状态能力的感知水平ToM任务时,至少在某些个体中,注视模式与神经认知策略,尤其是执行功能相关,而不是与特定的社会认知功能本身相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992b/11785719/4e24ad8c1b8d/41598_2025_88483_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Eye tracking based clustering using the Korean version of the reading the mind in the eyes test.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88483-6.
2
Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 21;2014(3):CD008785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2.
4
Theory of Mind and Neurocognition in Bipolar Mania Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives.
J Clin Psychol. 2025 Sep;81(9):868-877. doi: 10.1002/jclp.70003. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
A transdiagnostic study of theory of mind in children and youth with neurodevelopmental conditions.
Mol Autism. 2025 Jul 20;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13229-025-00671-3.
6
Theory of Mind in Patients with Epilepsy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Mar;26(1):3-24. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9313-x. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Exploring preparatory reading in bidirectional sight and written translation through clustering analysis of eye-tracking data.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0329858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329858. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
"Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test": Translated and Korean Versions.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Apr;18(4):295-303. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0289. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Considerations for using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess cognitive flexibility.
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2083-2091. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01551-3. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Relationship with Neurocognition and Facial Emotion Recognition in Non-Clinical Youths.
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Aug;17(8):835-839. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0281. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights: An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures.
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00905. eCollection 2020.
6
Spatial Color Efficacy in Perceived Luxury and Preference to Stay: An Eye-Tracking Study of Retail Interior Environment.
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 31;11:296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00296. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验