da Silva Aghata Elins Moreira, Macias Franco Arturo, de Moura Felipe Henrique, Norris Aaron, Bangert Kelli Noelle, Bezerra Leilson Rocha, Mota Lucas Gimenez, Fonseca Mozart Alves
Department of Agriculture, Veterinary, & Rangeland Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Nutripura, Rondonópolis, MT 78705-600, Brazil.
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 14;9:txaf006. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf006. eCollection 2025.
This study evaluated how the backgrounding diet can affect water intake, animal performance and water and feed efficiency of steers fed finishing diets based on grains or forages. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298 ± 10.2 kg) were fed during backgrounding either a moderate (MP, = 12; triticale hay only, 9.1%crude protein [CP], 1.07 Mcal/kg net energy available for maintenance [NEm], and 0.52 Mcal/kg net energy available for gain [NEg]) or high plane of nutrition (HP, = 12; 85% alfalfa hay and 15% beardless wheat hay, 12.62%CP, 1.23 Mcal/kg NEm, and 0.66 Mcal/kg NEg) during the background phase (85 d). After this period, steers were assigned to two finishing phase groups containing half of the animals from each backgrounding diets. During the finishing phase, animals were fed either a forage-based (Alfalfa hay; CP: 20.8% DM, NEm: 1.47 Mcal/kg, NEg: 0.88 Mcal/kg) or a grain-based diet (80% whole corn and 20% wheat hay; CP: 10.6% DM, NEm: 1.96 Mcal/kg, NEg: 1.31 Mcal/kg). There was no interaction between the effects of the previous plane of nutrition [(moderate (MP) or high (HP)] and finishing diets (forage or grain-fed) on any of the variables studied ( > 0.05). Animals backgrounded on MP were lighter and had a lower DMI when compared with HP ( < 0.01). However, no differences were observed on the drinking water intake (DWI) between MP and HP ( > 0.05). HP animals were more efficient in gross water efficiency ( < 0.01), but less efficient on residual feed intake ( < 0.05), compared to MP animals. During the finishing phase, forage fed animals had a greater DMI and DWI compared with grain-fed animals ( < 0.01), however, no differences were observed on the final BW ( > 0.05). Grain-fed animals were more efficient for water and feed intake and had a greater marbling score ( < 0.01) compared to forage-fed. Animals fed on HP and finished in a grain-fed diet had the least DWI ( < 0.05) and greatest body condition score ( < 0.05), marbling score ( < 0.01) and rib depth ( < 0.05). In the first 20 d of the finishing period, the previous plane affected the variables ADG, DMI, CPi, and DWI (as kg DMI and CP) in the finishing plane. Altogether, our results highlight the individual effects of backgrounding and finishing systems on DWI and the efficiency of finishing animals, as well as the importance of providing adequate nutrition during the earlier stages of life.
本研究评估了育肥前期日粮如何影响基于谷物或草料的育肥牛的饮水量、动物生产性能以及水和饲料利用效率。24头杂交安格斯公牛(体重298±10.2千克)在育肥前期分别饲喂中等营养水平(MP组,n = 12;仅小黑麦干草,粗蛋白[CP]含量9.1%,维持净能[NEm]1.07兆卡/千克,增重净能[NEg]0.52兆卡/千克)或高营养水平(HP组,n = 12;85%苜蓿干草和15%无芒小麦干草,CP含量12.62%,NEm 1.23兆卡/千克,NEg 0.66兆卡/千克)的日粮,为期85天。在此期间过后,将公牛分配到两个育肥期组,每组包含来自各育肥前期日粮组的一半动物。在育肥期,动物分别饲喂基于草料的日粮(苜蓿干草;CP:20.8%干物质,NEm:1.47兆卡/千克,NEg:0.88兆卡/千克)或基于谷物的日粮(80%整粒玉米和20%小麦干草;CP:10.6%干物质,NEm:1.96兆卡/千克,NEg:1.31兆卡/千克)。先前营养水平(中等[MP]或高[HP])和育肥日粮(草料或谷物饲喂)对所研究的任何变量均无交互作用(P>0.05)。与HP组相比,MP组的公牛体重更轻,干物质采食量(DMI)更低(P<0.01)。然而,MP组和HP组之间的饮水量(DWI)未观察到差异(P>0.05)。与MP组动物相比,HP组动物的总水利用效率更高(P<0.01),但剩余采食量效率更低(P<0.05)。在育肥期,饲喂草料的动物与饲喂谷物的动物相比,DMI和DWI更高(P<0.01),然而,最终体重未观察到差异(P>0.05)。与饲喂草料的动物相比,饲喂谷物的动物在水和饲料采食量方面更高效,大理石花纹评分更高(P<0.01)。以HP日粮育肥并饲喂谷物日粮的动物DWI最低(P<0.05),体况评分最高(P<0.05)、大理石花纹评分最高(P<0.01)且肋部深度最大(P<0.05)。在育肥期的前20天,先前的营养水平影响了育肥期的平均日增重(ADG)、DMI、摄入粗蛋白(CPi)和DWI(以DMI和CP的千克数计)等变量。总之,我们的结果突出了育肥前期和育肥系统对DWI以及育肥动物效率的个体影响,以及在生命早期提供充足营养的重要性。