Yeo Kennan Zg, Yeo Mark Hx, Seah Shawn Js, Lim Winston Sr, Lie Denny Tt
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 169608, Singapore.
J Orthop. 2024 Dec 28;66:135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.12.038. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Surgical treatment for patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) consists of soft tissue, bony, and arthroplasty interventions. Partial lateral facetectomy (PLF) is a bone-reducing procedure, commonly done in conjunction with soft tissue and realignment procedures, that has grown in popularity after failure of conservative treatment due to its efficacy and minimally invasive nature. This systematic review and meta-analysis thus seeks to evaluate the efficacy of PLF in the absence of reviews on this topic.
A systematic review of three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus) was conducted, identifying studies that evaluated postoperative outcomes of PLF on patients who had PFOA. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted between preoperative versus postoperative values of a subjective outcome measure (Knee Society Score (KSS)) and radiographic outcome measure (Congruence Angle (CA)). Subgroup analysis was performed on different concomitant procedures aside from PLF to determine their effect on clinical outcomes.
Ten studies were included in this review, with 463 patients and 495 knees and a pooled mean follow-up of 63.2 months and age of 56.3 years. Six studies investigated PLF with lateral release, two with realignment procedures, one with lateral lengthening, and one with both lateral release and realignment. Five studies found significant improvement (p < 0.01) in KSS (34.45; 95%CI: 26.41 to 42.49, and four studies reported significant improvement (p < 0.01) in CA (-10.31; 95%CI: 13.80 to -6.81). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in KSS between PLF with lateral release, lateral lengthening, and realignment (p < 0.01) but not for CA (p = 0.65).
PLF is an effective treatment for PFOA using subjective and radiographic outcome measures. Current cohort studies have shown significant improvement in PFOA treatment, even in the context of long-term outcomes and severe PFOA, and provides valuable insight into the use of PLF as a viable minimally invasive surgical option to treat PFOA in addition to other procedures such as lateral retinacular release and realignment procedures.
髌股关节炎(PFOA)的手术治疗包括软组织、骨和关节成形术干预。部分外侧半月板切除术(PLF)是一种减少骨量的手术,通常与软组织和重新排列手术联合进行,由于其疗效和微创性,在保守治疗失败后越来越受欢迎。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估在缺乏关于该主题综述的情况下PLF的疗效。
对三个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus)进行系统评价,确定评估PLF对PFOA患者术后结局的研究。对主观结局指标(膝关节协会评分(KSS))和影像学结局指标(一致性角(CA))的术前与术后值进行成对荟萃分析。对PLF以外的不同伴随手术进行亚组分析,以确定它们对临床结局的影响。
本综述纳入了10项研究,共463例患者和495个膝关节,平均随访时间为63.2个月,年龄为56.3岁。6项研究调查了PLF联合外侧松解术,2项研究联合重新排列手术,1项研究联合外侧延长术,1项研究联合外侧松解术和重新排列手术。5项研究发现KSS有显著改善(p<0.01)(34.45;95%CI:26.41至42.49),4项研究报告CA有显著改善(p<0.01)(-10.31;95%CI:13.80至-6.81)。亚组分析显示,PLF联合外侧松解术、外侧延长术和重新排列手术在KSS方面存在显著差异(p<0.01),但在CA方面无显著差异(p=0.65)。
使用主观和影像学结局指标,PLF是治疗PFOA的有效方法。目前的队列研究表明,即使在长期结局和重度PFOA的情况下,PFOA治疗也有显著改善,并且除了外侧支持带松解和重新排列手术等其他手术外,还为将PLF作为治疗PFOA的可行微创外科选择的应用提供了有价值的见解。