Ranganath Nischal, Bisono Garcia Bismarck, Vaillant James, Katragadda Silpita, Kerkelis Melissa, Abu Saleh Omar, Fida Madiha
Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 5;12(2):ofaf038. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf038. eCollection 2025 Feb.
The underlying cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains unidentified in up to 51% of cases despite systematic evaluation. Microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing (mcfDNA-NGS) offers an agnostic, noninvasive approach to pathogen identification, but the utility and clinical impact of this assay in FUO remain unknown.
This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients referred for FUO evaluation at a tertiary medical center between November 2019 and November 2023. Patients underwent both standard microbiologic testing (ST) and mcfDNA-NGS. Diagnostic impact was assessed in 4 domains: new diagnoses, earlier time to diagnosis, avoidance of invasive procedures, and non-hypothesis-driven diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive mcfDNA-NGS testing.
Among 176 patients, mcfDNA-NGS was positive in 44.3%, with 49% of these cases considered clinically significant. Infectious cause of FUO was identified in 39% of patients, noninfectious in 35%, and unknown in 26%. mcfDNA-NGS contributed to a positive diagnostic impact in 30% of cases, mainly by earlier diagnosis (16%) and potential for avoidance of invasive procedures (10%). Positive mcfDNA-NGS was significantly associated with higher Charlson comorbidity index score (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; < .001) and white blood cell (WBC) count ≤4.5 × 10 cells/L (OR, 8.61; < .001). Conversely, FUO without localization was associated with a decreased likelihood of positive mcfNDA testing (OR, 0.18; < .001).
mcfDNA-NGS effectively complements ST in diagnosing FUO, providing earlier detection and minimizing invasive testing. Clinical predictors such as high comorbidity and low WBC count may guide the optimal use of mcfDNA-NGS in FUO. Prospective evaluation of optimal timing and use of mcfDNA-NGS and cost-benefit analysis in FUO is needed.
尽管进行了系统评估,但高达51%的不明原因发热(FUO)病例的潜在病因仍未明确。微生物游离DNA下一代测序(mcfDNA-NGS)为病原体鉴定提供了一种无偏见的非侵入性方法,但该检测在FUO中的效用和临床影响尚不清楚。
这项回顾性队列研究评估了2019年11月至2023年11月期间在一家三级医疗中心因FUO评估而转诊的成年患者。患者同时接受了标准微生物检测(ST)和mcfDNA-NGS。在四个领域评估诊断影响:新诊断、更早的诊断时间、避免侵入性操作以及非假设驱动的诊断。使用逻辑回归来确定mcfDNA-NGS检测阳性的预测因素。
在176例患者中,mcfDNA-NGS阳性率为44.3%,其中49%的病例被认为具有临床意义。39%的患者FUO的病因被确定为感染性,35%为非感染性,26%为不明原因。mcfDNA-NGS在30%的病例中对诊断有积极影响,主要是通过更早的诊断(16%)和避免侵入性操作的可能性(10%)。mcfDNA-NGS检测阳性与较高的查尔森合并症指数评分(优势比[OR],1.22;P <.001)和白细胞(WBC)计数≤4.5×10⁹/L(OR,8.61;P <.001)显著相关。相反,无定位的FUO与mcfNDA检测阳性的可能性降低相关(OR,0.18;P <.001)。
mcfDNA-NGS在诊断FUO方面有效地补充了ST,提供了更早的检测并最大限度地减少了侵入性检测。高合并症和低WBC计数等临床预测因素可能指导mcfDNA-NGS在FUO中的最佳使用。需要对mcfDNA-NGS在FUO中的最佳时机和使用以及成本效益分析进行前瞻性评估。