Madut Deng B, Chemaly Roy F, Dadwal Sanjeet S, Hill Joshua A, Lee Yeon Joo, Haidar Ghady, Luk Alfred, Drelick Alexander, Chin-Hong Peter V, Benamu Esther, Khawaja Fareed, Nanayakkara Deepa, Papanicolaou Genovefa A, Small Catherine Butkus, Fung Monica, Barron Michelle, Davis Thomas, McClain Micah T, Maziarz Eileen K, Bedoya Armando D, Gilstrap Daniel L, Todd Jamie L, Barkauskas Christina E, Heldman Madeleine R, Bigelow Robert, Leimberger Jeffrey D, Tsalik Ephraim L, Wolf Olivia, Mughar Mona, Lau Constance, Noll Nicholas, Hollemon Desiree, Duttagupta Radha, Lupu Daniel S, Bercovici Sivan, Perkins Bradley A, Blauwkamp Timothy A, Fowler Vance G, Holland Thomas L, Bergin Stephen P
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 22;11(8):ofae425. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae425. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing can establish the etiology of multiple infectious syndromes by identifying microbial DNA in plasma. However, data are needed to define the clinical scenarios where this tool offers the highest clinical benefit.
We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study that evaluated the impact of plasma mcfDNA sequencing compared with usual care testing among adults with hematologic malignancies. This is a secondary analysis of an expanded cohort that evaluated the clinical utility of plasma mcfDNA sequencing across prespecified and adjudicated outcomes. We examined the percentage of participants for whom plasma mcfDNA sequencing identified a probable cause of pneumonia or clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection. We then assessed potential changes in antimicrobial therapy based on plasma mcfDNA sequencing results and the potential for early mcfDNA testing to avoid bronchoscopy and its associated adverse events.
Of 223 participants, at least 1 microbial detection by plasma mcfDNA sequencing was adjudicated as a probable cause of pneumonia in 57 (25.6%) and a clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection in 88 (39.5%). A probable cause of pneumonia was exclusively identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing in 23 (10.3%) participants. Antimicrobial therapy would have changed for 41 (18.4%) participants had plasma mcfDNA results been available in real time. Among the 57 participants with a probable cause of pneumonia identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing, bronchoscopy identified no additional probable cause of pneumonia in 52 (91.2%).
Plasma mcfDNA sequencing could improve management of both pneumonia and other concurrent infections in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.
血浆微生物游离DNA(mcfDNA)测序可通过识别血浆中的微生物DNA来确定多种感染综合征的病因。然而,需要数据来界定该工具能带来最大临床益处的临床场景。
我们开展了一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究,比较了血浆mcfDNA测序与常规护理检测对血液系统恶性肿瘤成年患者的影响。这是一项对扩大队列的二次分析,该队列评估了血浆mcfDNA测序在预先指定和判定结果方面的临床效用。我们检查了血浆mcfDNA测序确定肺炎或临床相关非肺炎感染可能病因的参与者百分比。然后,我们根据血浆mcfDNA测序结果评估抗菌治疗的潜在变化,以及早期mcfDNA检测避免支气管镜检查及其相关不良事件的可能性。
在223名参与者中,血浆mcfDNA测序至少检测到1种微生物,其中57名(25.6%)被判定为肺炎的可能病因,88名(39.5%)被判定为临床相关非肺炎感染的可能病因。仅通过血浆mcfDNA测序确定23名(10.3%)参与者为肺炎的可能病因。如果血浆mcfDNA结果实时可用,41名(18.4%)参与者的抗菌治疗将会改变。在血浆mcfDNA测序确定为肺炎可能病因的57名参与者中,支气管镜检查在52名(91.2%)参与者中未发现其他肺炎可能病因。
血浆mcfDNA测序可改善疑似肺炎的免疫功能低下患者肺炎及其他并发感染的管理。