Suppr超能文献

可穿戴传感器检测认知反刍的潜力:一项范围综述

The Potential of Wearable Sensors for Detecting Cognitive Rumination: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Arnold Vitica X, Young Sean D

机构信息

Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;25(3):654. doi: 10.3390/s25030654.

Abstract

Cognitive rumination, a transdiagnostic symptom across mental health disorders, has traditionally been assessed through self-report measures. However, these measures are limited by their temporal nature and subjective bias. The rise in wearable technologies offers the potential for continuous, real-time monitoring of physiological indicators associated with rumination. This scoping review investigates the current state of research on using wearable technology to detect cognitive rumination. Specifically, we examine the sensors and wearable devices used, physiological biomarkers measured, standard measures of rumination used, and the comparative validity of specific biomarkers in identifying cognitive rumination. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on IEEE, Scopus, PubMed, and PsycInfo databases. Studies that used wearable devices to measure rumination-related physiological responses and biomarkers were included ( = 9); seven studies assessed one biomarker, and two studies assessed two biomarkers. Electrodermal Activity (EDA) sensors capturing skin conductance activity emerged as both the most prevalent sensor ( = 5) and the most comparatively valid biomarker for detecting cognitive rumination via wearable devices. Other commonly investigated biomarkers included electrical brain activity measured through Electroencephalogram (EEG) sensors ( = 2), Heart Rate Variability (HRV) measured using Electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors and heart rate fitness monitors ( = 2), muscle response measured through Electromyography (EMG) sensors ( = 1) and movement measured through an accelerometer ( = 1). The Empatica E4 and Empatica Embrace 2 wrist-worn devices were the most frequently used wearable ( = 3). The Rumination Response Scale (RRS), was the most widely used standard scale for assessing rumination. Experimental induction protocols, often adapted from Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow's 1993 rumination induction paradigm, were also widely used. In conclusion, the findings suggest that wearable technology offers promise in capturing real-time physiological responses associated with rumination. However, the field is still developing, and further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the impact of individual traits and contextual factors on the accuracy of rumination detection.

摘要

认知反刍是一种跨心理健康障碍的跨诊断症状,传统上是通过自我报告测量来评估的。然而,这些测量方法受到其时间特性和主观偏差的限制。可穿戴技术的兴起为持续、实时监测与反刍相关的生理指标提供了潜力。本综述探讨了使用可穿戴技术检测认知反刍的研究现状。具体而言,我们研究了所使用的传感器和可穿戴设备、测量的生理生物标志物、使用的反刍标准测量方法,以及特定生物标志物在识别认知反刍方面的比较有效性。该综述是根据系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南在IEEE、Scopus、PubMed和PsycInfo数据库上进行的。纳入了使用可穿戴设备测量与反刍相关的生理反应和生物标志物的研究(n = 9);七项研究评估了一种生物标志物,两项研究评估了两种生物标志物。捕捉皮肤电导活动的皮肤电活动(EDA)传感器成为最普遍的传感器(n = 5),也是通过可穿戴设备检测认知反刍最具比较有效性的生物标志物。其他常见的研究生物标志物包括通过脑电图(EEG)传感器测量的脑电活动(n = 2)、使用心电图(ECG)传感器和心率健康监测器测量的心率变异性(HRV)(n = 2)、通过肌电图(EMG)传感器测量的肌肉反应(n = 1)以及通过加速度计测量的运动(n = 1)。Empatica E4和Empatica Embrace 2腕戴式设备是最常用的可穿戴设备(n = 3)。反刍反应量表(RRS)是评估反刍最广泛使用的标准量表。实验诱导方案通常改编自诺伦 - 霍克西玛和莫罗1993年的反刍诱导范式,也被广泛使用。总之,研究结果表明可穿戴技术在捕捉与反刍相关的实时生理反应方面具有前景。然而,该领域仍在发展,需要进一步研究来验证这些发现,并探索个体特征和情境因素对反刍检测准确性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d90/11820721/97e2a6aa3126/sensors-25-00654-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验