Ghadimzadeh Alamdari Ali, Zade Farzad Azizi, Ebrahimkhanlou Arvin
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics (MEM), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948944, Iran.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;25(3):712. doi: 10.3390/s25030712.
The maturity of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) methods has now reached a significant level that motivates in-depth and problem-specific reviews. The focus of this study is to investigate the evolution of vision-based, LiDAR-based, and a combination of these methods and evaluate their performance in enclosed and GPS-denied (EGD) conditions for infrastructure inspection. This paper categorizes and analyzes the SLAM methods in detail, considering the sensor fusion type and chronological order. The paper analyzes the performance of eleven open-source SLAM solutions, containing two visual (VINS-Mono, ORB-SLAM 2), eight LiDAR-based (LIO-SAM, Fast-LIO 2, SC-Fast-LIO 2, LeGO-LOAM, SC-LeGO-LOAM A-LOAM, LINS, F-LOAM) and one combination of the LiDAR and vision-based method (LVI-SAM). The benchmarking section analyzes accuracy and computational resource consumption using our collected dataset and a test dataset. According to the results, LiDAR-based methods performed well under EGD conditions. Contrary to common presumptions, some vision-based methods demonstrate acceptable performance in EGD environments. Additionally, combining vision-based techniques with LiDAR-based methods demonstrates superior performance compared to either vision-based or LiDAR-based methods individually.
同时定位与地图构建(SLAM)方法如今已发展成熟,达到了值得进行深入且针对具体问题的综述研究的水平。本研究的重点是探究基于视觉、基于激光雷达以及二者结合的方法的发展历程,并评估它们在封闭且无全球定位系统(GPS)信号环境(EGD)下进行基础设施检测时的性能。本文根据传感器融合类型和时间顺序,对SLAM方法进行了详细分类与分析。本文分析了十一种开源SLAM解决方案的性能,其中包括两种基于视觉的方案(VINS-Mono、ORB-SLAM 2)、八种基于激光雷达的方案(LIO-SAM、Fast-LIO 2、SC-Fast-LIO 2、LeGO-LOAM、SC-LeGO-LOAM、A-LOAM、LINS、F-LOAM)以及一种基于激光雷达与视觉的组合方法(LVI-SAM)。基准测试部分使用我们收集的数据集和一个测试数据集,分析了准确性和计算资源消耗情况。根据结果,基于激光雷达的方法在EGD条件下表现良好。与普遍认知相反,一些基于视觉的方法在EGD环境中也展现出了可接受的性能。此外,将基于视觉的技术与基于激光雷达的方法相结合,相比于单独的基于视觉或基于激光雷达的方法,展现出了更优越的性能。