de Macedo Jaimar Fellipe Silva, Laerte Lopes Ribeiro Bruno, de Morais Ferreira Ayrton Bruno, Oliveira Ricardo Santos, Mortatti Arnaldo Luis
INTEGRA - Integrative Physiology, Health, and Performance Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0317432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317432. eCollection 2025.
In adolescent sports, grouping by chronological age can advantage athletes born early in the year due to maturation differences. Early maturing athletes often achieve greater performance gains, are perceived as more talented, and receive more specialized training and workloads. This study aimed to assess the effects of biobanding on internal and external training loads, as well as technical performance during small-sided games (SSGs).
Twenty male footballers (11.8 ± 1.15 years) participated in this study. Athletes engaged in small-sided games (SSGs) under two conditions: (1) CA-teams formed based on chronological age; and (2) BIO-teams formed based on age relative to peak height velocity (pre-PHV = -2.5 to -1.5, and PHV = -1.5 to -0.5). External load (ETL) was quantified using the PlayerLoad method, while internal load (ITL) was measured using both training impulse (TRIMP) and session-RPE. Player involvement was determined by summing all technical actions performed during the SSGs, with involvement in the game assessed through video analysis of the sessions.
BIO games significantly increased ETL for pre-PHV (EM = 415.5; 95%CI = 381.5-449.5 a.u.) compared to the CA games (EM = 388.8; 95% CI = 354.8-422.8 a.u.). PHV players had lower ETL (EM = 354.4; 95% CI = 320.4-388.4 a.u.) in BIO compared to CA games (EM = 366.0; 95% CI = 332.0-400.0 a.u.). No significant ITL differences were observed. BIO lowered steals among pre-PHV players vs. CA.
Biobanded games significantly increased external load (ETL) for pre-PHV players; however, this increase was not substantial enough to affect internal load (as measured by session-RPE and TRIMP) or player involvement.
在青少年体育运动中,按实际年龄分组可能会使年初出生的运动员因成熟度差异而占据优势。早熟运动员往往能取得更大的成绩提升,被认为更有天赋,并接受更多的专项训练和更高的训练负荷。本研究旨在评估生物分组对小场地比赛(SSG)期间内部和外部训练负荷以及技术表现的影响。
20名男性足球运动员(11.8±1.15岁)参与了本研究。运动员在两种条件下进行小场地比赛(SSG):(1)按实际年龄组建的CA组;(2)按相对于身高增长峰值速度的年龄组建的BIO组(身高增长峰值前=-2.5至-1.5,身高增长峰值=-1.5至-0.5)。使用球员负荷法量化外部负荷(ETL),同时使用训练冲量(TRIMP)和训练主观用力程度(session-RPE)来测量内部负荷(ITL)。通过汇总小场地比赛期间执行的所有技术动作来确定球员参与度,并通过对比赛视频分析来评估球员在比赛中的参与情况。
与CA组比赛(EM=388.8;95%CI=354.8-422.8任意单位)相比,BIO组比赛显著增加了身高增长峰值前球员的外部负荷(EM=415.5;95%CI=381.5-449.5任意单位)。与CA组比赛(EM=366.0;95%CI=332.0-400.0任意单位)相比,身高增长峰值球员在BIO组比赛中的外部负荷较低(EM=354.4;95%CI=320.4-388.4任意单位)。未观察到显著的内部负荷差异。与CA组相比,BIO组降低了身高增长峰值前球员的抢断次数。
生物分组比赛显著增加了身高增长峰值前球员的外部负荷(ETL);然而,这种增加幅度不足以影响内部负荷(通过训练主观用力程度和训练冲量测量)或球员参与度。