Burgio L D, Page T J, Capriotti R M
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Spring;18(1):45-59. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-45.
We evaluated methods for comparing the effects of dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine), thioridazine (Mellaril), and contingency management in the control of severe behavior problems. A reversal design was used in which medications were systematically titrated and assessed in unstructured as well as structured settings with three clients. Subsequently, behavioral procedures including timeout, differential reinforcement of other behavior, and visual screening, were used in a multiple-baseline design across settings. The assessment and design methods were useful in comparing the interventions. Dextroamphetamine decreased inappropriate behaviors and improved academic behaviors in one client, but no reliable effects were observed in the other two clients. Thioridazine was variable across clients, settings, behaviors, and dosages. Contingency management produced consistent decreases in inappropriate behaviors and small improvements in academic performance.
我们评估了比较右旋苯丙胺(德克塞德林)、硫利达嗪(美立廉)以及应急管理在控制严重行为问题方面效果的方法。采用了一种反转设计,其中对三种药物进行系统滴定,并在非结构化和结构化环境中对三名客户进行评估。随后,在跨环境的多基线设计中使用了包括暂停、对其他行为的差别强化以及视觉筛查在内的行为程序。评估和设计方法对于比较这些干预措施很有用。右旋苯丙胺在一名客户身上减少了不适当行为并改善了学业行为,但在另外两名客户身上未观察到可靠效果。硫利达嗪在不同客户、环境、行为和剂量之间存在差异。应急管理使不适当行为持续减少,学业成绩有小幅提高。