• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的诱导后低血压预测:识别风险因素并加强麻醉管理。

Machine learning-based prediction of post-induction hypotension: identifying risk factors and enhancing anesthesia management.

作者信息

Chen Ming, Zhang Dingyu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1277, Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02930-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-02930-y
PMID:39987101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11846375/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-induction hypotension (PIH) increases surgical complications including myocardial injury, acute kidney injury, delirium, stroke, prolonged hospitalization, and endangerment of the patient's life. Machine learning is an effective tool to analyze large amounts of data and identify perioperative complication factors. This study aims to identify risk factors for PIH and develop predictive models to support anesthesia management.

METHODS

A dataset of 5406 patients was analyzed using machine learning methods. Logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural network models were compared. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The logistic regression model achieved an AUROC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), outperforming the random forest (AUROC: 0.71), XGBoost (AUROC: 0.72), and neural network (AUROC: 0.72) models. In terms of calibration, logistic regression demonstrated superior performance, as reflected by Brier Scores and calibration curves, followed by XGBoost, random forest, and neural network. Decision curve analysis indicated that the logistic regression model provided the greatest clinical utility among all models. Baseline blood pressure, age, sex, type of surgery, platelet count, and certain anesthesia-inducing drugs were identified as important features.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a valuable tool for personalized preoperative risk assessment and customized anesthesia management, allowing for early intervention and improved patient outcomes. Integration of machine learning models into electronic medical record systems can facilitate real-time risk assessment and prediction.

摘要

背景

诱导后低血压(PIH)会增加手术并发症的发生,包括心肌损伤、急性肾损伤、谵妄、中风、住院时间延长以及危及患者生命。机器学习是分析大量数据并识别围手术期并发症因素的有效工具。本研究旨在识别PIH的危险因素并开发预测模型以支持麻醉管理。

方法

使用机器学习方法分析了5406例患者的数据集。比较了逻辑回归、随机森林、XGBoost和神经网络模型。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。

结果

逻辑回归模型的AUROC为0.74(95%CI:0.71 - 0.77),优于随机森林(AUROC:0.71)、XGBoost(AUROC:0.72)和神经网络(AUROC:0.72)模型。在校准方面,逻辑回归表现出卓越性能,这在Brier评分和校准曲线中得到体现,其次是XGBoost、随机森林和神经网络。决策曲线分析表明,逻辑回归模型在所有模型中提供了最大的临床实用性。基线血压、年龄、性别、手术类型、血小板计数和某些诱导麻醉药物被确定为重要特征。

结论

本研究为个性化术前风险评估和定制麻醉管理提供了有价值的工具,允许进行早期干预并改善患者预后。将机器学习模型集成到电子病历系统中可以促进实时风险评估和预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/acd1aa5c5f23/12911_2025_2930_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/ec03979662c2/12911_2025_2930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/144cbf8cd51a/12911_2025_2930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/889783b09efe/12911_2025_2930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/49f20a606ca1/12911_2025_2930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/acd1aa5c5f23/12911_2025_2930_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/ec03979662c2/12911_2025_2930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/144cbf8cd51a/12911_2025_2930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/889783b09efe/12911_2025_2930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/49f20a606ca1/12911_2025_2930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b88/11846375/acd1aa5c5f23/12911_2025_2930_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based prediction of post-induction hypotension: identifying risk factors and enhancing anesthesia management.基于机器学习的诱导后低血压预测:识别风险因素并加强麻醉管理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02930-y.
2
Machine learning-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery.基于机器学习的预测模型用于接受非心脏手术的稳定冠状动脉疾病患者围手术期主要不良心血管事件的预测
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Mar;260:108561. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108561. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
Incorporating intraoperative blood pressure time-series variables to assist in prediction of acute kidney injury after type a acute aortic dissection repair: an interpretable machine learning model.将术中血压时间序列变量纳入其中,以协助预测 A 型急性主动脉夹层修复术后急性肾损伤:一个可解释的机器学习模型。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2266458. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2266458. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Predicting lack of clinical improvement following varicose vein ablation using machine learning.使用机器学习预测静脉曲张消融术后临床改善不佳的情况。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 May;13(3):102162. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102162. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
5
Development of a prediction model for hypotension after induction of anesthesia using machine learning.应用机器学习开发麻醉诱导后低血压预测模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231172. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):973-987.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 20.
8
Postoperative delirium prediction using machine learning models and preoperative electronic health record data.基于机器学习模型和术前电子健康记录数据预测术后谵妄。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01543-y.
9
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
10
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying patterns of high intraoperative blood pressure variability in noncardiac surgery using explainable machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.使用可解释机器学习识别非心脏手术中术中血压高变异性模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2537920. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2537920. Epub 2025 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A long duration of intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative delirium occurrence following thoracic and orthopedic surgery in elderly.术中低血压时间长与老年胸科和骨科手术后术后谵妄的发生有关。
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Sep;88:111125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111125. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
VitalDB, a high-fidelity multi-parameter vital signs database in surgical patients.VitalDB,一个高保真多参数手术患者生命体征数据库。
Sci Data. 2022 Jun 8;9(1):279. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01411-5.
3
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.
STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Development of a random forest model for hypotension prediction after anesthesia induction for cardiac surgery.用于预测心脏手术麻醉诱导后低血压的随机森林模型的开发。
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Oct 16;9(29):8729-8739. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8729.
5
Risk factors including preoperative echocardiographic parameters for post-induction hypotension in general anesthesia.全身麻醉诱导后低血压的术前超声心动图参数等危险因素。
J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
Construction of a predictive model of post-intubation hypotension in critically ill patients using multiple machine learning classifiers.使用多种机器学习分类器构建危重症患者插管后低血压的预测模型。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Sep;72:110279. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110279. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Mechanisms contributing to hypotension after anesthetic induction with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium: a prospective observational study.舒芬太尼、丙泊酚和罗库溴铵诱导麻醉后低血压的发生机制:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):341-347. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00653-9. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension.机器学习与深度学习预测诱导后低血压的对比分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 14;20(16):4575. doi: 10.3390/s20164575.
9
Development of a prediction model for hypotension after induction of anesthesia using machine learning.应用机器学习开发麻醉诱导后低血压预测模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231172. eCollection 2020.
10
Pre-anaesthesia ultrasonography of the subclavian/infraclavicular axillary vein for predicting hypotension after inducing general anaesthesia: A prospective observational study.超声引导锁骨下/锁骨下入路腋静脉在预测全麻诱导后低血压中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jun;37(6):474-481. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001192.