Oguta James Odhiambo, Breeze Penny, Wambiya Elvis, Kibe Peter, Akoth Catherine, Otieno Peter, Dodd Peter J
Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield, UK.
African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 22;5(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00772-3.
This systematic review sought to examine the application of decision analytic models (DAMs) to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a region that has experienced an increasing CVD burden in the last two decades.
We searched seven databases and identified model-based economic evaluations of interventions targeting CVD prevention among adult populations in SSA. All articles were screened by two reviewers, data was extracted, and narrative synthesis was performed. Quality assessment was performed using the Philips checklist.
The review included 27 articles from eight SSA countries. The majority of the studies evaluated interventions for primary CVD prevention, with primordial prevention interventions being the least evaluated. Markov models were the most commonly used modelling method. Seven studies incorporated equity dimensions in the modelling, which were assessed mainly through subgroup analysis. The mean quality score of the papers was 68.9% and most studies reported data challenges while only three studies conducted model validation.
The review finds few studies modelling the impact of interventions targeting primordial prevention and those evaluating equitable strategies for improving access to CVD prevention. There is a need for increased transparency in model building, validation and documentation.
本系统评价旨在研究决策分析模型(DAMs)在评估撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)心血管疾病(CVD)预防干预措施中的应用,在过去二十年中,该地区的CVD负担不断增加。
我们检索了七个数据库,并确定了针对SSA成年人群中CVD预防干预措施的基于模型的经济评估。所有文章均由两名审稿人筛选,提取数据,并进行叙述性综合分析。使用飞利浦检查表进行质量评估。
该评价纳入了来自八个SSA国家的27篇文章。大多数研究评估了原发性CVD预防的干预措施,而初始预防干预措施的评估最少。马尔可夫模型是最常用的建模方法。七项研究在建模中纳入了公平维度,主要通过亚组分析进行评估。论文的平均质量得分是68.9%,大多数研究报告了数据挑战,而只有三项研究进行了模型验证。
该评价发现,很少有研究对针对初始预防的干预措施的影响进行建模,也很少有研究评估改善CVD预防可及性的公平策略。在模型构建、验证和记录方面需要提高透明度。