Currie Geoffrey, Kiat Hosen
School of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jan 30;12(2):51. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020051.
Vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaque involves a dynamic pathophysiologic process within and surrounding an atheromatous plaque in coronary artery intima. The process drastically increases the risk of plaque rupture and is clinically responsible for most cases of acute coronary syndromes, myocardial infarctions, and sudden cardiac deaths. Early detection of vulnerable plaque is crucial for clinicians to implement appropriate risk-mitigation treatment strategies, offer timely interventions, and prevent potentially life-threatening events. There is an imperative clinical need to develop practical diagnostic pathways that utilize non-invasive means to risk-stratify symptomatic patients. Since the early 1990s, the identification of vulnerable plaque in clinical practice has primarily relied on invasive imaging techniques. In the last two decades, CT coronary angiogram (CTCA) has rapidly evolved into the prevalent non-invasive diagnostic modality for assessing coronary anatomy. There are now validated plaque appearances on CTCA correlating with plaque vulnerability. It is worth noting that in clinical practice, most CTCA reports omit mention of vulnerable plaque details because spatial resolution (0.3-0.5 mm) is often insufficient to reliably detect some crucial features of vulnerable plaques, such as thin fibrous caps. Additionally, accurately identifying vulnerable plaque features requires substantial expertise and time, which many cardiologists or radiologists may lack in routine reporting. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is also non-invasive and allows simultaneous anatomic and functional assessment of coronary plaques. Despite several decades of research and development, routine clinical application of cMRI in coronary plaque imaging remains hampered by complex imaging protocols, inconsistent image quality, and cost. Molecular imaging with radiotracers, specifically positron emission tomography (PET) with sodium fluoride (NaF PET), have demonstrated significant potential as a sensitive and specific imaging procedure for diagnosing vulnerable coronary artery plaque. The study protocol is robust and brief, requiring minimal patient preparation. Compared to CTCA and cMRI, the diagnostic accuracy of this test is less dependent on the experience and expertise of the readers. Furthermore, validated automated quantitative algorithms complement the visual interpretation of the study, enhancing confidence in the diagnosis. This combination of factors makes NaF PET a promising tool in cardiology for identifying high-risk coronary plaques.
易损冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块涉及冠状动脉内膜粥样斑块内部及周围的动态病理生理过程。该过程会大幅增加斑块破裂的风险,临床上大多数急性冠状动脉综合征、心肌梗死和心源性猝死病例都与之相关。早期检测易损斑块对于临床医生实施适当的风险缓解治疗策略、及时进行干预以及预防潜在的危及生命的事件至关重要。迫切需要开发实用的诊断途径,利用非侵入性手段对有症状的患者进行风险分层。自20世纪90年代初以来,临床实践中易损斑块的识别主要依赖于侵入性成像技术。在过去的二十年中,CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)已迅速发展成为评估冠状动脉解剖结构的主要非侵入性诊断方法。现在CTCA上有与斑块易损性相关的已验证斑块表现。值得注意的是,在临床实践中,大多数CTCA报告都未提及易损斑块的细节,因为空间分辨率(0.3 - 0.5毫米)往往不足以可靠地检测到易损斑块的一些关键特征,如薄纤维帽。此外,准确识别易损斑块特征需要大量的专业知识和时间,许多心脏病专家或放射科医生在常规报告中可能缺乏这些。心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)也是非侵入性的,并且可以同时对冠状动脉斑块进行解剖和功能评估。尽管经过了几十年的研发,但cMRI在冠状动脉斑块成像中的常规临床应用仍然受到复杂成像方案、图像质量不一致和成本的阻碍。使用放射性示踪剂的分子成像,特别是氟化钠正电子发射断层扫描(NaF PET),已显示出作为诊断易损冠状动脉斑块的敏感和特异成像程序的巨大潜力。该研究方案稳健且简短,所需的患者准备极少。与CTCA和cMRI相比,该测试的诊断准确性对阅片者的经验和专业知识的依赖性较小。此外,经过验证的自动定量算法补充了对研究的视觉解读,增强了诊断的可信度。这些因素的综合使得NaF PET成为心脏病学中识别高危冠状动脉斑块的有前途的工具。