• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指称语境在英语学习者关系从句歧义消解中的作用:工作记忆容量的调节效应

The Role of Referential Context in EFL Learners' Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution: Modulating Effect of Working Memory Capacity.

作者信息

Sun Danning, Chen Zihan, Zhu Shanhua

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.

Department of English, Linguistics and Theatre Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Feb 26;54(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s10936-025-10125-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-025-10125-9
PMID:40009232
Abstract

This study examines the referential context effect on second-language relative clause ambiguity resolution by proficient L1 Chinese learners who learn English as a foreign language (EFL) and investigates whether the ambiguity resolution process is constrained by individuals' working memory capacity (WMC). It presents a self-paced reading study and investigates L2 relative clauses ambiguity resolution in two phases. The baseline phase probes Chinese EFL learners' initial attachment preference when comprehending global ambiguous sentences without referential context. In the further experimental phases, each target sentence is preceded by a referential context with either neutral or NP-biasing information. We observe the change in reaction time spent on processing sentences and answering comprehension questions. Results showed that firstly regardless of WMC, proficient Chinese EFL learners employed a high-attachment parsing strategy when there was no referential context. Secondly, referential context facilitated sentence processing and comprehension, as demonstrated by decreased reaction times in critical region and on comprehension questions from neutral to biased contexts, with no significant difference in accuracy rates. Notably, the contextual effect was more pronounced when high-attachment contextual cues were present. Thirdly, working memory capacity modulated the ambiguity resolution process. Participants with different WMCs showed different parsing behaviors, and this difference manifested itself in both the interpretive and post-interpretive stages of processing. Participants with lower WMC had limited cognitive resources for processing ambiguous sentences, whereas those with larger WMC were more adept at resolving ambiguity in a context-dependent manner. These findings offer new insights into L2 shallow sentence processing as well as WMC constraints in L2 ambiguity resolution.

摘要

本研究考察了以中文为母语的熟练英语学习者(将英语作为外语学习,即EFL)在第二语言关系从句歧义消解中的指称语境效应,并探究了歧义消解过程是否受到个体工作记忆容量(WMC)的限制。研究采用了自定步速阅读研究方法,分两个阶段探究第二语言关系从句的歧义消解。基线阶段探究中国EFL学习者在理解无指称语境的全局歧义句时最初的附着偏好。在后续实验阶段,每个目标句子之前都有一个带有中性或名词短语偏向信息的指称语境。我们观察处理句子和回答理解问题所花费的反应时间的变化。结果表明,首先,无论工作记忆容量如何,熟练的中国EFL学习者在没有指称语境时都采用高附着解析策略。其次,指称语境促进了句子处理和理解,从无偏向语境到有偏向语境,关键区域和理解问题上反应时间的减少证明了这一点,准确率没有显著差异。值得注意的是,当存在高附着语境线索时,语境效应更为明显。第三,工作记忆容量调节了歧义消解过程。不同工作记忆容量的参与者表现出不同的解析行为,这种差异在处理的解释性和后解释性阶段都有体现。工作记忆容量较低的参与者处理歧义句的认知资源有限,而工作记忆容量较大的参与者更善于以依赖语境的方式消解歧义。这些发现为第二语言浅层句子处理以及第二语言歧义消解中的工作记忆容量限制提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
The Role of Referential Context in EFL Learners' Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution: Modulating Effect of Working Memory Capacity.指称语境在英语学习者关系从句歧义消解中的作用:工作记忆容量的调节效应
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Feb 26;54(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s10936-025-10125-9.
2
The Role of Working Memory, Language Proficiency, and Learners' Age in Second Language English Learners' Processing and Comprehension of Anaphoric Sentences.工作记忆、语言能力和学习者年龄在第二语言英语学习者对指代性句子的处理与理解中的作用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Apr;48(2):353-370. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9607-2.
3
Working Memory Capacity and Relative Clause Attachment Preference of Persian EFL Learners: Does Segmentation Play Any Role?工作记忆容量与关系从句附着偏好:波斯语 EFL 学习者的差异 分割是否起作用?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):683-706. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09825-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
The relationship between working memory capacity, bilingualism, and ambiguous relative clause attachment.工作记忆容量、双语与歧义相对从句附着的关系。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1530-1547. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01561-4. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
The Effect of Metacognitive Intervention on the Listening Performance and Metacognitive Awareness of High- and Low-Working Memory Capacity EFL Learners.元认知干预对高、低工作记忆能力英语学习者听力表现和元认知意识的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Sep 4;53(5):70. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10102-8.
6
Use of Referential Discourse Contexts in L2 Offline and Online Sentence Processing.二语离线和在线句子处理中参照性语篇语境的运用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1045-65. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9393-z.
7
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.二语英语学习者句法加工中的任务敏感性:来自自定步速阅读中足够好加工的证据
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:575847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847. eCollection 2020.
8
Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.语篇中的句法歧义消解:对指代语境和词汇频率的影响进行建模
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Nov;24(6):1521-43. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1521.
9
Chinese EFL learners different from English natives in cataphora resolution: Evidence from eye-tracking studies.中国英语学习者在指代消解方面与以英语为母语者不同:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1126673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126673. eCollection 2023.
10
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension.快速序列视觉呈现与句子理解过程中的歧义相互作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Jun;48(3):665-682. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-09624-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Working Memory Capacity and Relative Clause Attachment Preference of Persian EFL Learners: Does Segmentation Play Any Role?工作记忆容量与关系从句附着偏好:波斯语 EFL 学习者的差异 分割是否起作用?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):683-706. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09825-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?句法处理中的个体差异:是否有读者与文本互动的证据?
J Mem Lang. 2018 Oct;102:155-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
母语和非母语句子理解中重新分析与语义持续性研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):907-25. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984231. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
4
Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution.歧义消解中的句子复杂性与工作记忆效应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Oct;42(5):393-411. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4.
5
The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach.工作记忆在句法歧义消解中的作用:一种心理测量方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):64-81. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64.
6
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.工作记忆广度任务:方法学综述与用户指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03196772.
7
Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.言语工作记忆与句子理解。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001788.
8
Construal: overview, motivation, and some new evidence.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 May;26(3):277-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1025024524133.
9
Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism.人类句子处理机制中的近因偏好。
Cognition. 1996 Apr;59(1):23-59. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00687-7.
10
Interaction with context during human sentence processing.人类句子处理过程中与语境的交互。
Cognition. 1988 Dec;30(3):191-238. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0.