• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习死亡率风险预测模型通知系统对高危患者进行预先护理计划的质量改进研究。

Quality Improvement Study Using a Machine Learning Mortality Risk Prediction Model Notification System on Advance Care Planning in High-Risk Patients.

作者信息

Walter Jonathan, Ma Jessica, Platt Alyssa, Acker Yvonne, Sendak Mark, Gao Michael, Gardner Matt, Balu Suresh, Setji Noppon

机构信息

Department of Medicine Duke University School of Medicine.

Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health System.

出版信息

J Brown Hosp Med. 2024 Jul 2;3(3):120907. doi: 10.56305/001c.120907. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.56305/001c.120907
PMID:40026409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11864393/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is an important aspect of patient care that is underutilized. Machine learning (ML) models can help identify patients appropriate for ACP. The objective was to evaluate the impact of using provider notifications based on an ML model on the rate of ACP documentation and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a pre-post QI intervention study at a tertiary academic hospital. Adult patients admitted to general medicine teams identified to be at elevated risk of mortality using an ML model were included in the study. The intervention consisted of notifying a provider by email and page for a patient identified by the ML model.

RESULTS

A total of 479 encounters were analyzed of which 282 encounters occurred post-intervention. The covariate-adjusted proportion of higher-risk patients with documented ACP rose from 6.0% at baseline to 56.5% (Risk Ratio (RR)= 9.42, 95% CI: 4.90 - 18.11). Patients with ACP were more than twice as likely to have code status reduced when ACP was documented (29.0% vs. 10.8% RR=2.69, 95% CI: 1.64 - 4.27). Additionally, patients with ACP had twice the odds of hospice referral (22.2% vs. 12.6% Odds Ratio=2.16, 95% CI: 1.16 - 4.01). However, patients with ACP documented had a longer mean LOS (9.7 vs. 7.6 days, Event time ratio = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10 - 1.53).

CONCLUSION

Provider notifications using an ML model can lead to an increase in completion of ACP documentation by frontline clinicians in the inpatient setting.

摘要

背景

预先护理计划(ACP)是患者护理的一个重要方面,但目前未得到充分利用。机器学习(ML)模型有助于识别适合进行ACP的患者。本研究的目的是评估基于ML模型的医护人员通知对ACP文件记录率和患者结局的影响。

方法

这是一项在三级学术医院进行的前后对照质量改进干预研究。使用ML模型确定为死亡风险升高的普通内科团队收治的成年患者纳入本研究。干预措施包括通过电子邮件和传呼通知医护人员ML模型识别出的患者。

结果

共分析了479次诊疗,其中282次诊疗发生在干预后。经协变量调整后,记录有ACP的高风险患者比例从基线时的6.0%升至56.5%(风险比(RR)=9.42,95%置信区间:4.90-18.11)。记录有ACP时,有ACP的患者降低急救状态的可能性增加两倍多(29.0%对10.8%,RR=2.69,95%置信区间:1.64-4.27)。此外,有ACP的患者接受临终关怀转诊的几率增加两倍(22.2%对12.6%,优势比=2.16,95%置信区间:1.16-4.01)。然而,记录有ACP的患者平均住院时间更长(9.7天对7.6天,事件时间比=1.29,95%置信区间:1.10-1.53)。

结论

在住院环境中,使用ML模型通知医护人员可使一线临床医生完成ACP文件记录的情况增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baef/11864393/5d433b3809c5/bhm_2024_3_3_120907_235430.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baef/11864393/6ee145589bb9/bhm_2024_3_3_120907_235427.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baef/11864393/5d433b3809c5/bhm_2024_3_3_120907_235430.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baef/11864393/6ee145589bb9/bhm_2024_3_3_120907_235427.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baef/11864393/5d433b3809c5/bhm_2024_3_3_120907_235430.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality Improvement Study Using a Machine Learning Mortality Risk Prediction Model Notification System on Advance Care Planning in High-Risk Patients.使用机器学习死亡率风险预测模型通知系统对高危患者进行预先护理计划的质量改进研究。
J Brown Hosp Med. 2024 Jul 2;3(3):120907. doi: 10.56305/001c.120907. eCollection 2024.
2
Provider Interaction With an Electronic Health Record Notification to Identify Eligible Patients for a Cluster Randomized Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: Secondary Analysis.医疗机构互动与电子健康记录通知以识别初级保健中预先医疗指示的群组随机试验的合格患者:二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e41884. doi: 10.2196/41884.
3
Machine Learning for Targeted Advance Care Planning in Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Study.机器学习在癌症患者目标性超前医疗照护计划中的应用:一项质量改进研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):539-547.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.036. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Coaches Activating, Reaching, and Engaging Patients to Engage in Advance Care Planning: A Randomized Clinical Trial.教练促使、接触并引导患者参与预先护理计划:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;10(7):949-953. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1242.
5
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure.针对成年心力衰竭患者的预先护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD013022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013022.pub2.
6
Oncologist phenotypes and associations with response to a machine learning-based intervention to increase advance care planning: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.肿瘤学家表型与基于机器学习的干预措施反应的关联,以增加预先护理计划:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0267012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267012. eCollection 2022.
7
Increasing Advance Care Planning Discussions and Documentation.增加临终关怀规划讨论与记录。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2025 Mar 16:1-7. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.7.
8
Occurrence of Advance Care Planning and Hospital Course in Patients Admitted for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) During the Pandemic.大流行期间因 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)入院患者的预先医疗照护计划的发生和住院过程。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):669-676. doi: 10.1177/10499091221123570. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
9
Missed Opportunities and Health Disparities for Advance Care Planning Before Elective Surgery in Older Adults.老年人择期手术前的预先医疗照护计划错失机会与健康差异。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):e223687. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3687. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
10
Association of an Advance Care Planning Video and Communication Intervention With Documentation of Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.一项关于预立医疗照护计划视频和沟通干预措施与老年患者预立医疗照护计划记录之间关联的非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0354.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a Serious Illness Risk Prediction Model: Impact on Goals of Care Documentation.实施重病风险预测模型:对关怀目标文档记录的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):603-610.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
The Use of Templates for Documenting Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Descriptive Analysis.使用模板记录预先医疗照护计划谈话:描述性分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Advanced Care Planning for Hospitalized Patients Following Clinician Notification of Patient Mortality by a Machine Learning Algorithm.
临床医生使用机器学习算法通知患者死亡后,对住院患者进行高级医疗照护计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238795. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8795.
4
Long-term Effect of Machine Learning-Triggered Behavioral Nudges on Serious Illness Conversations and End-of-Life Outcomes Among Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.机器学习触发的行为推动对癌症患者严重疾病对话和临终结局的长期影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):414-418. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6303.
5
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分对反事实生存函数估计的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac043.
6
Exploring expanded interdisciplinary roles in goals of care conversations in a national goals of care initiative: A qualitative approach.在国家目标关怀计划中探索关怀目标对话中扩大跨学科角色:一种定性方法。
Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;35(8):1542-1552. doi: 10.1177/02692163211020473. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
7
Effect of Integrating Machine Learning Mortality Estimates With Behavioral Nudges to Clinicians on Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With Cancer: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.将机器学习死亡率估计与行为提示相结合,为临床医生提供指导,以改善癌症患者的严重疾病沟通:一项 stepped-wedge 聚类随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):e204759. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4759. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Deep transfer learning for reducing health care disparities arising from biomedical data inequality.基于深度迁移学习减少生物医学数据不平等导致的医疗保健差异
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 12;11(1):5131. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18918-3.
9
Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.
10
Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.机器学习方法预测癌症患者 6 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1915997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997.