• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国国民健康保险索赔数据中基线调整和队列分析的统计方法:倾向评分匹配法、逆概率加权法和生存分析综述及未来方向

Statistical Methods for Baseline Adjustment and Cohort Analysis in Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data: A Review of PSM, IPTW, and Survival Analysis With Future Directions.

作者信息

Kim Dong Wook

机构信息

Department of Information and Statistics, Department of Bio & Medical Big Data, Research Institute of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 3;40(8):e110. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e110.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e110
PMID:40034095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11876781/
Abstract

The utilization of health insurance claims data has expanded significantly, enabling researchers to conduct epidemiological studies on a large scale. This review examines key statistical methods for addressing baseline differences and conducting cohort analyses using Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting are widely used to mitigate selection bias and enhance causal inference in observational studies. These methods help improve study validity by balancing covariates between treatment and control groups. Additionally, survival analysis techniques, such as the Cox proportional hazards model, are essential for assessing time-to-event outcomes and estimating hazard ratios while accounting for censoring. However, the application of these statistical methods is accompanied by challenges, including unmeasured confounding, instability in weight estimation, and violations of model assumptions. To address these limitations, emerging approaches, such as Doubly robust estimation, machine learning-based causal inference, and the marginal structural model, have gained prominence. These techniques offer greater flexibility and robustness in real-world data analysis. Future research should focus on refining methodologies for integrating high-dimensional health datasets and leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance predictive modeling and causal inference. Furthermore, the expansion of international collaborations and the adoption of standardized data models will facilitate large-scale multi-center studies. Ethical considerations, including data privacy and algorithmic transparency, should also be prioritized to ensure responsible data use. Maximizing the utility of health insurance claims data requires interdisciplinary collaboration, methodological advancements, and the implementation of rigorous statistical techniques to support evidence-based healthcare policy and improve public health outcomes.

摘要

健康保险理赔数据的利用已大幅扩展,使研究人员能够大规模开展流行病学研究。本综述探讨了使用韩国国民健康保险理赔数据来解决基线差异和进行队列分析的关键统计方法。倾向得分匹配和治疗权重的逆概率在观察性研究中被广泛用于减轻选择偏倚并增强因果推断。这些方法通过平衡治疗组和对照组之间的协变量来帮助提高研究的有效性。此外,生存分析技术,如Cox比例风险模型,对于评估事件发生时间结局和估计风险比同时考虑删失情况至关重要。然而,这些统计方法的应用伴随着挑战,包括未测量的混杂因素、权重估计的不稳定性以及模型假设的违反。为解决这些局限性,诸如双重稳健估计、基于机器学习的因果推断和边际结构模型等新兴方法已受到关注。这些技术在实际数据分析中提供了更大的灵活性和稳健性。未来的研究应专注于完善整合高维健康数据集的方法,并利用人工智能来增强预测建模和因果推断。此外,国际合作的扩展和标准化数据模型的采用将促进大规模多中心研究。还应优先考虑包括数据隐私和算法透明度在内的伦理考量,以确保负责任的数据使用。最大化健康保险理赔数据的效用需要跨学科合作、方法学进步以及实施严格的统计技术,以支持基于证据的医疗政策并改善公共卫生结果。

相似文献

1
Statistical Methods for Baseline Adjustment and Cohort Analysis in Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data: A Review of PSM, IPTW, and Survival Analysis With Future Directions.韩国国民健康保险索赔数据中基线调整和队列分析的统计方法:倾向评分匹配法、逆概率加权法和生存分析综述及未来方向
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 3;40(8):e110. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e110.
2
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.倾向评分加权加上比例风险模型中的调整不是双重稳健的。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.
4
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Leveraging National Health Insurance Service Data for Public Health Research in Korea: Structure, Applications, and Future Directions.利用韩国国民健康保险服务数据开展公共卫生研究:结构、应用及未来方向。
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 3;40(8):e111. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e111.
7
Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.应用大规模倾向评分匹配和基数匹配在观察性研究中的因果推断的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 May 24;21(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01282-1.
8
Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.利用倾向评分匹配设计检验观察性生存数据中的因果效应。
Stat Med. 2018 May 20;37(11):1846-1858. doi: 10.1002/sim.7599. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.高维倾向评分算法在具有时变干预措施的比较效果研究中的应用
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):753-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.6377. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Multiply robust causal inference of the restricted mean survival time difference.多重稳健限制平均生存时间差的因果推断。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):2386-2404. doi: 10.1177/09622802231211009. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
How place shapes genital herpes simplex distribution in South Korea: a Bayesian spatial analysis using National Health Insurance Service data.地点如何影响韩国单纯疱疹病毒的生殖器分布:一项使用国民健康保险服务数据的贝叶斯空间分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):3023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24171-4.
2
Novel modified blumgart anastomosis reduces clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.新型改良Blumgart吻合术可降低胰十二指肠切除术后临床相关胰瘘的发生率:一项使用治疗权重逆概率的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 19;12:1610561. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1610561. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancing Korean Medical Research Through Comprehensive Data Resources.通过综合数据资源推动韩国医学研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 3;40(8):e104. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e104.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and Utilizing Claim Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) Database for Research.理解并利用韩国国民健康保险服务(NHIS)和健康保险审查与评估(HIRA)数据库中的理赔数据进行研究。
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2022 May;11(2):103-110. doi: 10.12997/jla.2022.11.2.103. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.高性能医学:人机智能融合。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Associations between sex work laws and sex workers' health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies.性工作法律与性工作者健康之间的关联:定量和定性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 11;15(12):e1002680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002680. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Big data: Some statistical issues.大数据:一些统计学问题。
Stat Probab Lett. 2018 May;136:111-115. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2018.02.015.
6
Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.倾向评分法与协变量调整的比较:4 项心血管研究中的评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):345-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.060.
7
Pragmatic Trials.实用性试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
8
Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.观察性健康数据科学与信息学(OHDSI):观察性研究人员的机遇。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:574-8.
9
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
10
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential.医疗保健中的大数据分析:前景与潜力。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Feb 7;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3. eCollection 2014.