Zhang Daiyan, Semkovska Maria
DeFREE Research Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 12;68(1):e46. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.31.
Depression affects twice as many women as men. Risk factors for depression certainly impact this difference, but their strong interconnectedness challenges the assessment of standalone contributions. Network models allow the identification of systematic independent relationships between individual symptoms and risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the extended networks of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and leisure activities in like-sex twins differ depending on gender or zygosity.
Twins, including 2,040 women (918 monozygotic and 1,122 dizygotic) and 1,712 men (730 monozygotic and 982 dizygotic), were selected from the Danish Twin Registry for having, along with their like-sex co-twin, completed measures of depressive symptoms, cognition, and leisure activities (physical, intellectual, and social). Network models were estimated and compared at three levels: co-twins to each other within groups defined by gender and zygosity; monozygotic to dizygotic twins within the same gender, and between genders.
No significant differences were observed when co-twins were compared to each other, regardless of the pair's zygosity or gender, nor when monozygotic twins were compared to dizygotic twins within gender. However, the gendered networks differed significantly in global strength, structure, and partial correlations between specific depressive symptoms and risk factors, all indicating stronger connectedness in women relative to men.
Environmental factors appear to best explain between-gender network differences. Women's networks showed significantly stronger associations both among depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and risk factors (i.e., decreased cognition and leisure activities). Longitudinal research is needed to determine the causality and directionality of these relationships.
抑郁症对女性的影响是男性的两倍。抑郁症的风险因素无疑影响了这种差异,但其强烈的相互关联性对单独贡献的评估提出了挑战。网络模型有助于识别个体症状与风险因素之间的系统性独立关系。本研究旨在评估同性双胞胎中抑郁症状、认知功能和休闲活动的扩展网络是否因性别或合子性而异。
从丹麦双胞胎登记处选取双胞胎,包括2040名女性(918对同卵双胞胎和1122对异卵双胞胎)和1712名男性(730对同卵双胞胎和982对异卵双胞胎),他们与同性双胞胎一起完成了抑郁症状、认知和休闲活动(身体、智力和社交方面)的测量。在三个层面估计并比较网络模型:在由性别和合子性定义的组内,双胞胎相互之间;同性别内的同卵双胞胎与异卵双胞胎之间;以及不同性别之间。
无论双胞胎的合子性或性别如何,相互比较时均未观察到显著差异,同性别内的同卵双胞胎与异卵双胞胎比较时也未观察到显著差异。然而,不同性别的网络在整体强度、结构以及特定抑郁症状与风险因素之间的偏相关性方面存在显著差异,所有这些都表明女性的网络关联性相对于男性更强。
环境因素似乎最能解释性别间网络差异。女性的网络在抑郁症状之间以及抑郁症状与风险因素(即认知和休闲活动减少)之间显示出显著更强的关联。需要进行纵向研究以确定这些关系的因果性和方向性。