Kaur Ravneet, Sharma Anuradha, Wijekoon Nalaka
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab-144411, India.
Interdisciplinary Center for Innovation in Biotechnology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, 10250, Sri Lanka.
EXCLI J. 2025 Feb 19;24:267-285. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7973. eCollection 2025.
A significant obstacle in translating innovative breast cancer treatments from bench to bed side is demonstrating efficacy in preclinical settings prior to clinical trials, as the heterogeneity of breast cancer can be challenging to replicate in the laboratory. A significant number of potential medicines have not progressed to clinical trials because preclinical models inadequately replicate the complexities of the varied tumor microenvironment. Consequently, the variety of breast cancer models is extensive, and the selection of a model frequently depends on the specific inquiry presented. This review aims to present an overview of the existing breast cancer models, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and challenges in the context of innovative drug discovery, thereby offering insights that may be advantageous to future translational studies. Conventional monolayer cultures are critical for elucidating the different breast cancer types and their behavior, have limitations in adequately replicating tumor environments. The 3D models such as patient-derived xenografts, cell-derived xenografts and genetically engineered models offer better insights by maintaining tumor microenvironments and cellular heterogeneity. Results can be further enhanced when compared with breast epithelial cells, a negative control to determine early stages by investigating differences between healthy and cancerous mammary cells. While cell lines such as MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 etc are useful models, they exhibit genetic variations that may affect drug responses over time. Additionally, animal models, particularly rodents, are instrumental in breast cancer research due to their biological resemblances to humans and the relative ease of genetic modification, however, witness a low occurrence of tumors. This review thus concludes that different preclinical models have their associated benefits and pitfalls. Therefore, specific preclinical models can be created by altering the gene expression at the genetic level or could be selected as per specific experimental needs which will enable successful translation of preclinical findings into clinical trials can be possible. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).
将创新性乳腺癌治疗方法从实验室转化到临床应用面临的一个重大障碍是,在临床试验之前需要在临床前环境中证明其疗效,因为乳腺癌的异质性在实验室中难以复制。大量潜在药物未能进入临床试验阶段,原因是临床前模型无法充分复制不同肿瘤微环境的复杂性。因此,乳腺癌模型种类繁多,模型的选择通常取决于所提出的具体问题。本综述旨在概述现有的乳腺癌模型,强调它们在创新药物发现背景下的优势、局限性和挑战,从而为未来的转化研究提供有益的见解。传统的单层培养对于阐明不同类型的乳腺癌及其行为至关重要,但在充分复制肿瘤环境方面存在局限性。三维模型,如患者来源的异种移植模型、细胞来源的异种移植模型和基因工程模型,通过维持肿瘤微环境和细胞异质性,能提供更好的见解。与乳腺上皮细胞(作为阴性对照,通过研究健康和癌性乳腺细胞之间的差异来确定早期阶段)相比,结果可以进一步得到增强。虽然MCF-7、MDA-MB-231等细胞系是有用的模型,但它们会表现出基因变异,随着时间的推移可能会影响药物反应。此外,动物模型,特别是啮齿动物,由于其与人类的生物学相似性以及相对容易进行基因改造,在乳腺癌研究中发挥着重要作用,然而,其肿瘤发生率较低。因此,本综述得出结论,不同的临床前模型都有其相应的优点和缺陷。因此,可以通过在基因水平上改变基因表达来创建特定的临床前模型,或者根据特定的实验需求进行选择,这将使临床前研究结果成功转化为临床试验成为可能。另见图1的图形摘要。