• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对短食品供应链产品支付意愿的荟萃分析

Meta-Analysis of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Short Food Supply Chain Products.

作者信息

Mustapa Muhammad Adzran Che, Kallas Zein

机构信息

Centre for Agrofood Economics and Development-UPC-IRTA (CREDA) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Castelldefels 08860 Spain.

出版信息

Glob Chall. 2025 Jan 27;9(3):2400154. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202400154. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/gch2.202400154
PMID:40071222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891576/
Abstract

Due to their perceived benefits for health, the environment, the economy, and sustainability, in recent years there has been a growing interest on the part of researchers and policymakers in short-food supply chains (SFSCs). However, a systematic review of the literature on this topic remains lacking. To address this gap, the study conducts a meta-analysis to examine consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for SFSC products, taking into account various sociodemographic factors and sustainability attributes. On average, consumers are willing to pay a 34.5% premium for SFSC products. Key factors influencing WTP include gender, education, study year, age, region, product category, and sustainability attributes. Women exhibit higher WTP, and individuals with higher education levels also demonstrate increased WTP. Notably, WTP for SFSC products is lower before 2014, while younger consumers exhibit higher WTP overall. Consumers in Western Europe present higher WTP estimates compared to those in North America and other regions. In terms of sustainability attributes, organic products receive the highest WTP, with food categories such as meat, poultry, dairy products, and honey showing the highest estimates. These findings offer valuable insights for SFSC producers, marketers, and policymakers, guiding effective strategies to promote SFSC products within sustainable agri-food systems.

摘要

由于其在健康、环境、经济和可持续性方面的显著益处,近年来,研究人员和政策制定者对短食品供应链(SFSCs)的兴趣与日俱增。然而,目前仍缺乏对该主题文献的系统综述。为填补这一空白,本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,以考察消费者对短食品供应链产品的支付意愿(WTP),同时考虑各种社会人口因素和可持续性属性。平均而言,消费者愿意为短食品供应链产品支付高出34.5%的价格。影响支付意愿的关键因素包括性别、教育程度、学年、年龄、地区、产品类别和可持续性属性。女性表现出更高的支付意愿,受教育程度较高的个体也表现出更高的支付意愿。值得注意的是,2014年之前,消费者对短食品供应链产品的支付意愿较低,而年轻消费者总体上表现出更高的支付意愿。与北美和其他地区相比,西欧消费者的支付意愿估计更高。在可持续性属性方面,有机产品获得的支付意愿最高,肉类、家禽、乳制品和蜂蜜等食品类别显示出最高的估计值。这些发现为短食品供应链的生产商、营销商和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,有助于指导在可持续农业食品系统中推广短食品供应链产品的有效策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/53d39c66908e/GCH2-9-2400154-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/55293aecb0fe/GCH2-9-2400154-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/f1d4458f8faf/GCH2-9-2400154-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/9ebd3f87c607/GCH2-9-2400154-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/948ea75a481a/GCH2-9-2400154-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/54acea458f5d/GCH2-9-2400154-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/53d39c66908e/GCH2-9-2400154-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/55293aecb0fe/GCH2-9-2400154-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/f1d4458f8faf/GCH2-9-2400154-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/9ebd3f87c607/GCH2-9-2400154-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/948ea75a481a/GCH2-9-2400154-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/54acea458f5d/GCH2-9-2400154-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f1e/11891576/53d39c66908e/GCH2-9-2400154-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-Analysis of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Short Food Supply Chain Products.消费者对短食品供应链产品支付意愿的荟萃分析
Glob Chall. 2025 Jan 27;9(3):2400154. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202400154. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.消费者对可持续食品支付意愿的元分析
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105239. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Willingness-to-Pay for Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.环境可持续性标签对食品支付意愿的影响:离散选择实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 31;13(8):2677. doi: 10.3390/nu13082677.
4
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.消费者对增值鸡肉产品属性的偏好和支付意愿。
J Food Sci. 2011 Oct;76(8):S469-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x.
5
Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.消费者对使用微生物应用生产的植物性食品的支付意愿,以替代合成化学投入。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260488. eCollection 2021.
6
Consumer attitudes, willingness to pay and hedonic evaluations of innovative legume gnocchi products.消费者对创新型豆类意大利面疙瘩产品的态度、支付意愿和享乐评价。
J Sci Food Agric. 2025 Mar 30;105(5):2867-2878. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.14063. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
7
Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese's public willingness to pay a price premium for green products.公众愿意为绿色产品买单吗?基于对影响中国公众对绿色产品支付意愿的因素的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61408-61422. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14885-4. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
8
Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.消费者对有机食品和本地食品可持续性属性的认知
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2018;9(2):87-96. doi: 10.2174/2212798410666171215112058.
9
Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions.短食品供应链(SFSC)的可持续性评估:在一个非洲城市地区和三个欧洲城市地区开发并测试一种快速评估工具。
Agric Human Values. 2022;39(3):885-904. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10288-w. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Willingness to pay for certification and labeling of chicken meat in the Mymensingh District of Bangladesh.孟加拉国迈门辛区鸡肉认证和标签支付意愿。
J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2024 Sep 30;11(3):772-781. doi: 10.5455/javar.2024.k829. eCollection 2024 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Market potential for circular food in Europe based on consumer demand and willingness to pay.基于消费者需求和支付意愿的欧洲循环食品市场潜力。
NPJ Sci Food. 2025 Jul 21;9(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41538-025-00475-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumer awareness of sustainable supply chains: A choice experiment on Parma ham PDO.消费者对可持续供应链的认知:帕尔玛火腿 PDO 的选择实验。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 25;836:155602. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155602. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Letter from the editor: Meta-analysis models.编辑来信:荟萃分析模型
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Aug;87(2):291-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.01.036. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
3
Fixed- and Random-Effects Models.固定效应模型和随机效应模型。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:41-65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_3.
4
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.消费者对可持续食品支付意愿的元分析
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105239. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures.谁感到更大的环境风险?女性、年轻人和环保人士对一系列环境暴露表现出更高的担忧。
Environ Res. 2020 Feb;181:108918. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Social media echo chambers and satisfaction with democracy among Democrats and Republicans in the aftermath of the 2016 US elections.2016年美国大选后民主党人和共和党人当中的社交媒体回音室效应与对民主的满意度
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2018;28(4):424-442. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2018.1434784. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
The price is right!? A meta-regression analysis on willingness to pay for local food.价格合理吗?!对本地食品支付意愿的元回归分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0215847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215847. eCollection 2019.
8
The Need for Formal Evidence Synthesis in Food Policy: A Case Study of Willingness-to-Pay.食品政策中正式证据综合的必要性:支付意愿的案例研究
Animals (Basel). 2017 Mar 10;7(3):23. doi: 10.3390/ani7030023.
9
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
10
Meta-analysis: testing for reporting bias.Meta分析:报告偏倚检验
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7857. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7857.