Kasalo Niko, Domazet-Lošo Tomislav, Domazet-Lošo Mirjana
Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics, Division of Molecular Biology, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička Cesta 54, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 4;26(5):2285. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052285.
The outsourcing of amino acid (AA) production to the environment is relatively common across the tree of life. We recently showed that the massive loss of AA synthesis capabilities in animals is governed by selective pressure linked to the energy costs of AA production. Paradoxically, these AA auxotrophies facilitated the evolution of costlier proteomes in animals by enabling the increased use of energetically expensive AAs. Experiments in bacteria have shown that AA auxotrophies can provide a fitness advantage in competition with prototrophic strains. However, it remains unclear whether energy-related selection also drives the evolution of bacterial AA auxotrophies and whether this affects the usage of expensive AAs in bacterial proteomes. To investigate these questions, we computationally determined AA auxotrophy odds across 980 bacterial genomes representing diverse taxa and calculated the energy costs of all their proteins. Here, we show that auxotrophic AAs are generally more expensive to synthesize than prototrophic AAs in bacteria. Moreover, we found that the cost of auxotrophic AAs significantly correlates with the cost of their respective proteomes. Interestingly, out of all considered taxa, Mollicutes and Borreliaceae-chronic pathogens highly successful in immune evasion-have the most AA auxotrophies and code for the most expensive proteomes. These findings indicate that AA auxotrophies in bacteria, similar to those in animals, are shaped by selective pressures related to energy management. Our study reveals that bacterial AA auxotrophies act as costly outsourced functions, enabling bacteria to explore protein sequence space more freely. It remains to be investigated whether this relaxed use of expensive AAs also enabled auxotrophic bacteria to evolve proteins with improved or novel functionality.
将氨基酸(AA)生产外包给环境在整个生命之树中相对普遍。我们最近表明,动物体内氨基酸合成能力的大量丧失受与氨基酸生产能量成本相关的选择压力支配。矛盾的是,这些氨基酸营养缺陷型通过增加使用能量昂贵的氨基酸,促进了动物中成本更高的蛋白质组的进化。细菌实验表明,氨基酸营养缺陷型在与原养型菌株的竞争中可以提供适应性优势。然而,与能量相关的选择是否也驱动细菌氨基酸营养缺陷型的进化,以及这是否会影响细菌蛋白质组中昂贵氨基酸的使用,仍不清楚。为了研究这些问题,我们通过计算确定了代表不同分类群的980个细菌基因组中的氨基酸营养缺陷型几率,并计算了它们所有蛋白质的能量成本。在这里,我们表明,在细菌中,营养缺陷型氨基酸的合成通常比原养型氨基酸更昂贵。此外,我们发现营养缺陷型氨基酸的成本与它们各自蛋白质组的成本显著相关。有趣的是,在所有考虑的分类群中,支原体和疏螺旋体科(在免疫逃避方面非常成功的慢性病原体)具有最多的氨基酸营养缺陷型,并且编码最昂贵的蛋白质组。这些发现表明,细菌中的氨基酸营养缺陷型与动物中的类似,受与能量管理相关的选择压力影响。我们的研究表明,细菌氨基酸营养缺陷型起着成本高昂的外包功能的作用,使细菌能够更自由地探索蛋白质序列空间。昂贵氨基酸的这种宽松使用是否也使营养缺陷型细菌能够进化出具有改进或新功能的蛋白质,仍有待研究。