Gim Nayoon, Ferguson Alina, Blazes Marian, Soundarajan Sanjay, Gasimova Aydan, Jiang Yu, Sánchez Clara I, Zalunardo Luca, Corradetti Giulia, Elze Tobias, Honda Naoto, Waheed Nadia K, Cairns Anne Marie, Canto-Soler M Valeria, Domalpally Amitha, Durbin Mary, Ferrara Daniela, Hu Jewel, Nair Prashant, Lee Aaron Y, Sadda Srinivas R, Keenan Tiarnan D L, Patel Bhavesh, Lee Cecilia S
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Exp Eye Res. 2025 Jun;255:110342. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2025.110342. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of vision loss among older adults, affecting more than 200 million people worldwide. With no cure currently available and a rapidly increasing prevalence, emerging approaches such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise for advancing the study of AMD. The effective utilization of AI and ML in AMD research is highly dependent on access to high-quality and reusable clinical data. The Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles, published in 2016, provide a framework for sharing data that is easily useable by both humans and machines. However, it is unclear how these principles are implemented with regards to ophthalmic imaging datasets for AMD research. We evaluated openly available AMD-related datasets containing optical coherence tomography (OCT) data against the FAIR principles. The assessment revealed that none of the datasets were fully compliant with FAIR principles. Specifically, compliance rates were 5 % for Findable, 82 % for Accessible, 73 % for Interoperable, and 0 % for Reusable. The low compliance rates can be attributed to the relatively recent emergence of these principles and the lack of established standards for data and metadata formatting in the AMD research community. This article presents our findings and offers guidelines for adopting FAIR practices to enhance data sharing in AMD research.
年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是老年人视力丧失的主要原因,全球有超过2亿人受其影响。由于目前尚无治愈方法且患病率迅速上升,人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)等新兴方法有望推动AMD的研究。在AMD研究中有效利用AI和ML高度依赖于获取高质量且可重复使用的临床数据。2016年发布的可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重复使用(FAIR)原则提供了一个数据共享框架,便于人类和机器使用。然而,尚不清楚这些原则在AMD研究的眼科成像数据集方面是如何实施的。我们对照FAIR原则评估了公开可用的包含光学相干断层扫描(OCT)数据的AMD相关数据集。评估显示,没有一个数据集完全符合FAIR原则。具体而言,可查找性的符合率为5%,可访问性为82%,可互操作性为73%,可重复使用性为0%。符合率低可归因于这些原则相对较新出现,以及AMD研究社区缺乏既定的数据和元数据格式标准。本文介绍了我们的研究结果,并提供了采用FAIR实践以加强AMD研究中数据共享的指导方针。