• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过机器学习评估非药物干预措施对七个欧盟国家新冠疫情传播的因果影响。

Estimating the causal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 spread in seven EU countries via machine learning.

作者信息

Guski Jannis, Botz Jonas, Fröhlich Holger

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, 53757, Germany.

University of Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology (b-it), Bonn, 53115, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2
PMID:40097447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11914055/
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) were imposed all over Europe with the intent to reduce infection spread. However, reports on the effectiveness of those measures across different European countries are inconclusive up to now. Moreover, attempts to predict the effect of NPIs in a prospective and dynamical manner with the aim to support decision makers in future global health emergencies are largely lacking. Here, we explore causal machine learning to isolate causal effects of NPIs in observational public health data from seven EU countries, taking into account specific challenges like their sequential nature, effect heterogeneity, time-dependent confounding and lack of robustness due to violated assumptions. In a pseudo-prospective scenario planning analysis, we investigate which recommendations our model would have made during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany, demonstrating its capacity to generalize to the near future and identifying effective NPIs. In retrospect, our approach indicates that a wide range of response measures curbed COVID-19 across countries, especially in the early phases of the pandemic. Interestingly, this includes controversial interventions like strict school and border closures, but also recommendation-based policies in Sweden. Finally, we discuss important data- and modeling-related considerations that may optimize causal effect estimation in future pandemics.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,欧洲各地都实施了非药物干预措施(NPIs),旨在减少感染传播。然而,截至目前,关于这些措施在不同欧洲国家的有效性报告尚无定论。此外,在很大程度上缺乏以支持未来全球卫生紧急情况中决策者为目的,以前瞻性和动态方式预测非药物干预措施效果的尝试。在此,我们探索因果机器学习,以从七个欧盟国家的观察性公共卫生数据中分离出非药物干预措施的因果效应,同时考虑到诸如它们的顺序性质、效应异质性、时间依赖性混杂以及因假设违反导致的缺乏稳健性等特定挑战。在一个伪前瞻性情景规划分析中,我们研究了我们的模型在德国疫情第二波期间会给出哪些建议,展示了其推广到近期未来并识别有效非药物干预措施的能力。回顾来看,我们的方法表明,广泛的应对措施在各国抑制了新冠疫情,尤其是在疫情早期阶段。有趣的是,这包括严格的学校和边境关闭等有争议的干预措施,也包括瑞典基于建议的政策。最后,我们讨论了可能优化未来大流行中因果效应估计的重要数据和建模相关考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/c098aef1af57/41598_2025_88433_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/892ddc9b05c5/41598_2025_88433_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/fb3402daaa25/41598_2025_88433_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/95d08b27129f/41598_2025_88433_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/77fe062dc91a/41598_2025_88433_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/47f53b8c3732/41598_2025_88433_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/c098aef1af57/41598_2025_88433_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/892ddc9b05c5/41598_2025_88433_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/fb3402daaa25/41598_2025_88433_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/95d08b27129f/41598_2025_88433_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/77fe062dc91a/41598_2025_88433_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/47f53b8c3732/41598_2025_88433_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87b/11914055/c098aef1af57/41598_2025_88433_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the causal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 spread in seven EU countries via machine learning.通过机器学习评估非药物干预措施对七个欧盟国家新冠疫情传播的因果影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2.
2
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission across 130 countries and territories.非药物干预措施对 130 个国家和地区的 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01872-8.
3
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries.非药物干预对 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的影响:32 个欧洲国家的跨国自然实验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2341. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19799-7.
4
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 30 European countries: the ECDC-JRC Response Measures Database.针对 30 个欧洲国家 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:ECDC-JRC 应对措施数据库。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Oct;27(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.41.2101190.
5
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines: a systematic review.疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2.
6
Unequal ageing: the quality of life of senior citizens in the EU before and after COVID-19. A multidimensional approach.不平等的老龄化:新冠疫情前后欧盟老年人的生活质量。一种多维度方法。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;13:1506006. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506006. eCollection 2025.
7
COVID-19 pandemic spread against countries' non-pharmaceutical interventions responses: a data-mining driven comparative study.新冠疫情大流行对各国非药物干预措施的影响:基于数据挖掘的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;21(1):1607. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11251-4.
8
Public Perceptions and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Across Six Countries: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Twitter Data.六个国家公众对COVID-19非药物干预措施的认知与态度:基于推特数据的主题建模分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e21419. doi: 10.2196/21419.
9
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.引入和取消非药物干预措施与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)之间的时间关联:131 个国家的建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
Inferring the effective start dates of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 outbreaks.推断 COVID-19 疫情期间非药物干预措施的有效起始日期。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;117:361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.364. Epub 2022 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.非药物干预措施的效果评估:从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的经验教训。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Apr;8(4):e311-e317. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00046-4.
2
Modeling approaches for early warning and monitoring of pandemic situations as well as decision support.建模方法,用于对大流行情况进行预警和监测以及提供决策支持。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;10:994949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994949. eCollection 2022.
3
A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic.
一种用于估计新冠疫情期间非药物干预措施效果的因果推理方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0265289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265289. eCollection 2022.
4
The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review.评估 COVID-19 期间非药物干预措施效果的方法学:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;37(10):1003-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
5
Genetic and environmental influences on quality of life: The COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment.遗传和环境因素对生活质量的影响:COVID-19 大流行作为自然实验。
Genes Brain Behav. 2022 Nov;21(8):e12796. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12796. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Understanding an evolving pandemic: An analysis of the clinical time delay distributions of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom.了解不断演变的大流行:对英国 COVID-19 临床时间延迟分布的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0257978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257978. eCollection 2021.
7
Understanding the effectiveness of government interventions against the resurgence of COVID-19 in Europe.了解欧洲政府干预措施对 COVID-19 反弹的效果。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5820. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26013-4.
8
Machine Learning-Aided Causal Inference Framework for Environmental Data Analysis: A COVID-19 Case Study.基于机器学习的环境数据分析因果推断框架:以 COVID-19 为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 5;55(19):13400-13410. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02204. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Violations of the positivity assumption in the causal analysis of observational data: Consequences and statistical approaches.药物流行病学的核心概念:观察性数据分析中因果关系分析中阳性假设的违背:后果和统计方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):1471-1485. doi: 10.1002/pds.5338. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
10
COVID-19 European regional tracker.COVID-19 欧洲区域追踪器。
Sci Data. 2021 Jul 15;8(1):181. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00950-7.