Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;37(10):1003-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n = 248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effectiveness assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies.
非药物干预措施,如学校停课和居家令,已在全球范围内实施,以控制 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。它们在改善健康相关结果方面的有效性是许多实证研究的主题。然而,这些研究表明,所使用的方法学存在相当大的差异,这反映出缺乏既定的方法学框架。一方面,方法学的变化可能是为了评估结果的稳健性;另一方面,缺乏共同标准会阻碍研究之间的可比性。为了全面了解所使用的方法学,我们对 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 12 日评估非药物干预措施有效性的研究进行了系统回顾(n = 248)。我们发现,在研究设置、结果、干预措施、方法学方法和效果评估方面,方法学存在很大差异。在此基础上,我们指出了现有研究的不足之处,并为未来研究的设计提出了建议。