Šoková Bronislava, Greškovičová Katarína, Halamová Júlia, Baránková Martina
Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, Bratislava, 82105, Slovakia.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 18;13(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02250-2.
Despite continuous efforts to understand self-critical inner dialogues, little is known about the best practices people use to overcome their self-critics. In this study, we aimed to analyse the self-critical cycles of participants who scored high on coping to understand the most adaptive strategies and responses to the self-critic. The consensual qualitative analysis was performed by a team of three researchers and one auditor. The high scorers were identified from a convenience sample of 1,683 participants. Twenty participants, 14 women and 6 men, were randomly chosen from the sample of individuals who scored high in self-reporting inventory of coping. In-depth repeat interviews were conducted with 15 participants for the main analysis, and 5 were added to check the data saturation. The results revealed three core themes - I am okay but I need improving; I am okay but improving would help; and I am not okay and it is hard to be different. Furthermore, six main types of self-critic emerged from the data: Teamster, Non-feeler, Worrier, Not good enough for self, Not good enough for others, and Hated self. Self-critic sequences included the trigger or specific situation evoking that self-critic; accompanying emotions and/ or self-awareness; a particular kind of self-criticism and self-compassionate and/or self-protective responses to the self-critic that form part of coping. The results supported the Emotion Focused Theory of change, with self-compassionate and self-protective responses being aimed at various types of self-critic. Self-critic specific nuances were also identified. The study provided the possibilities of working with different types of inner critics and could alleviate the suffering caused by them.
尽管人们不断努力去理解自我批评的内心对话,但对于人们用来克服自我批评的最佳做法却知之甚少。在本研究中,我们旨在分析在应对方面得分较高的参与者的自我批评循环,以了解应对自我批评的最具适应性的策略和反应。由三名研究人员和一名审核员组成的团队进行了共识定性分析。高分者是从1683名参与者的便利样本中确定的。从应对自我报告量表得分高的个体样本中随机选择了20名参与者,其中14名女性和6名男性。对15名参与者进行了深入的重复访谈以进行主要分析,并增加了5名参与者以检查数据饱和度。结果揭示了三个核心主题——我还好但需要改进;我还好但改进会有帮助;我不好而且很难改变。此外,数据中出现了六种主要的自我批评类型:卡车司机型、无情感型、担忧型、对自己不够好、对他人不够好、讨厌自己型。自我批评序列包括引发该自我批评的触发因素或特定情况;伴随的情绪和/或自我意识;一种特定类型的自我批评以及对自我批评的自我同情和/或自我保护反应,这些构成了应对的一部分。结果支持了以情绪为中心的改变理论,自我同情和自我保护反应针对各种类型的自我批评。还确定了自我批评的特定细微差别。该研究提供了应对不同类型内心批评者的可能性,并可以减轻他们所造成的痛苦。