Suppr超能文献

危重型 COVID-19 气管切开患者的频率及结局:一项回顾性双中心队列研究

Frequency and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients with tracheostomy, a retrospective two-center cohort study.

作者信息

Elander Louise, Abdirashid Anzal, Andersson Henrik, Idh Jonna, Johansson Håkan, Chew Michelle S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Centre for Clinical Research, Sörmland, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70011. doi: 10.1111/aas.70011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal use of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is debated, and considerable uncertainties on the frequency, timing, and outcomes of tracheostomy remain. The objective was to study the frequency and timing of tracheostomy in a real-world population of critically ill COVID-19 patients. The secondary aim was to study whether early tracheostomy was associated with days alive and out of intensive care unit (ICU), days free of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), 60-day mortality, ventilator weaning rate, and ICU discharge rate compared to late tracheostomy.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective two-center cohort study. All COVID-19 patients admitted to critical care in the Region Östergötland County Council, Sweden, between March 2020 and September 2021 were included. Early (≤10 days from tracheal intubation) and late (>10 days) tracheostomy were compared. Through the Swedish intensive care registry, 249 mechanically ventilated COVID-19-positive patients ≥18 years old with respiratory failure were included. The pre-defined primary outcomes were the frequency and timing of tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes were days free of mechanical ventilation and intensive care, ICU discharge rate, ventilator weaning rate, and 60-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 319 identified patients (70% men), 249 (78%) underwent endotracheal intubation. Of these, 145 (58%) underwent tracheostomy and 99 (68%) were performed early. Tracheostomy patients (vs. non-tracheostomy) had fewer IMV-free days and ICU-free days (27 [0-43] vs. 52 [43-55], p < .001, and 24 [0-40] vs. 49 [41-52], p < .001). Late (vs. early) tracheostomy patients had fewer IMV- and ICU-free days (16 [0-31] vs. 36 [0-47], p < .001 and 8 [0-28] vs. 32 [0-44], p < .001). Early tracheostomy (vs. late) was associated with a significantly higher ICU discharge rate (adjusted HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.40-0.86], p = .006), but not with the weaning rate (adjusted HR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.12-3.32], p = .5) or 60-day mortality (adjusted HR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.61-2.67], p = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Tracheostomy is common in critically ill COVID-19 patients. In patients predicted to need a tracheostomy at some point, early, rather than late, tracheostomy might be a means to reduce the time spent in ICU. However, we do not have sufficient evidence to suggest that early tracheostomy reduces mortality or weaning rates, compared with late tracheostomy.

摘要

背景

新冠病毒病(COVID-19)患者气管切开术的最佳应用存在争议,气管切开术的频率、时机和结果仍存在诸多不确定性。目的是研究危重症COVID-19患者实际群体中气管切开术的频率和时机。次要目的是研究与晚期气管切开术相比,早期气管切开术是否与存活天数、转出重症监护病房(ICU)天数、无有创机械通气(IMV)天数、60天死亡率、撤机成功率和ICU出院率相关。

方法

本研究为一项回顾性双中心队列研究。纳入2020年3月至2021年9月期间在瑞典东约特兰郡议会重症监护病房收治的所有COVID-19患者。比较早期(气管插管后≤10天)和晚期(>10天)气管切开术。通过瑞典重症监护登记系统,纳入249例年龄≥18岁、因呼吸衰竭接受机械通气的COVID-19阳性患者。预先定义的主要结局是气管切开术的频率和时机。次要结局是无机械通气和重症监护天数、ICU出院率、撤机成功率和60天死亡率。

结果

在319例确诊患者中(70%为男性),249例(78%)接受了气管插管。其中,145例(58%)接受了气管切开术,99例(68%)为早期手术。气管切开术患者(与未行气管切开术患者相比)无IMV天数和无ICU天数更少(分别为27[0-43]天对52[43-55]天,p<.001;24[0-40]天对49[41-52]天,p<.001)。晚期(与早期相比)气管切开术患者无IMV天数和无ICU天数更少(分别为16[0-31]天对36[0-47]天,p<.001;8[0-28]天对32[0-44]天,p<.001)。早期气管切开术(与晚期相比)与显著更高的ICU出院率相关(校正风险比[HR]=0.59,95%置信区间[CI][0.40-0.86],p=.006),但与撤机成功率(校正HR=0.64,95%CI[0.12-3.32],p=.5)或60天死亡率(校正HR=1.27,95%CI[0.61-2.67],p=.5)无关。

结论

气管切开术在危重症COVID-19患者中很常见。对于预计在某个时间点需要气管切开术的患者,早期而非晚期气管切开术可能是减少在ICU停留时间的一种方法。然而,我们没有足够的证据表明与晚期气管切开术相比,早期气管切开术能降低死亡率或撤机成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验