• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Synthetic osteobiologics in spine surgery: a review.脊柱手术中的合成骨生物制剂:综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Oct 25;55(1):43-51. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5941. eCollection 2025.
2
Osteobiologics.骨生物制剂
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2004;62(1-2):13-7.
3
Use of osteobiologics in the management of osteoporotic fractures.骨生物制剂在骨质疏松性骨折治疗中的应用。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Jun;25 Suppl 2:S51-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c52.
4
Osteobiologics.骨生物制品
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Apr;36(4 Suppl):8-11.
5
Osteogenic protein-1 for long bone nonunion: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗长骨骨不连的成骨蛋白-1:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(6):1-57. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
6
Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone.硫酸钙和磷酸钙基骨替代物。模仿骨的矿物相。
Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Oct;30(4):615-23. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70114-0.
7
Osteobiologics.骨生物制品
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Jun 15;21(Suppl 1):S2-S9. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa383.
8
Osteobiologics and Value-Based Care: Challenges and Opportunities.骨生物制剂与基于价值的医疗:挑战与机遇
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 27;17(S3):S44-S52. doi: 10.14444/8560.
9
Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.提高腰椎手术中骨移植替代技术的临床证据。
Global Spine J. 2012 Dec;2(4):239-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315454. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
The use of osteoconductive bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma.骨传导性骨移植替代物在骨科创伤中的应用。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Sep;15(9):525-36. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200709000-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Different Osteobiologics in Terms of Imaging Modalities and Time Frames for Fusion Assessment in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中不同骨生物材料在融合评估的影像学方式及时间框架方面的比较:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):141S-162S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157312.
2
The Evidence for the Use of Osteobiologics in Hybrid Constructs (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Total Disc Replacement) in Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review.在多节段颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的混合结构(前路颈椎间盘切除融合术和全椎间盘置换术)中使用骨生物制剂的证据:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):120S-128S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221150795.
3
AO Spine Guideline for the Use of Osteobiologics (AOGO) in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Spinal Degenerative Cases.AO脊柱骨生物制剂在脊柱退行性疾病前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用指南(AOGO)
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):6S-13S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231178204.
4
Cellular Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery - Are They Worth the Risk: A Systematic Review.脊柱手术中的细胞性骨基质——它们值得冒风险吗:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2024 Apr;14(3):1070-1081. doi: 10.1177/21925682231205099. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Editorial: New perspectives and innovative techniques in contemporary spine surgery.社论:当代脊柱外科的新视角与创新技术
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 12;10:1220181. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1220181. eCollection 2023.
6
Can't See the Forest for the Trees: A Common Issue With Osteobiologics.只见树木,不见森林:骨生物制品的一个常见问题。
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):5S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231180396. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
Preliminary comparison of the remineralization and desensitization effects of a novel mineralized ion-releasing toothpaste and commercially available competitive products.一种新型矿化离子释放牙膏与市售竞争产品的再矿化和脱敏效果的初步比较。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Apr;18(2):848-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.027. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft i-Factor versus Use of Local Autologous Bone in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery.肽增强骨移植i因子与局部自体骨在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合手术中的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jul 24;13:681-691. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S318589. eCollection 2021.
9
The Impact of Osteobiologic Subtype Selection on Perioperative Complications and Hospital-Reported Charges in Single- and Multi-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion.骨生物亚型选择对单节段和多节段腰椎融合术围手术期并发症及医院报告费用的影响
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):654-662. doi: 10.14444/8086. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Polymer-Based Scaffold Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair and Regeneration.用于脊髓修复与再生的基于聚合物的支架策略
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 7;8:590549. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.590549. eCollection 2020.

脊柱手术中的合成骨生物制剂:综述

Synthetic osteobiologics in spine surgery: a review.

作者信息

Apaydin Aydın Sinan, Johnson Eli, Antwi Prince, Rocos Brett, Haglund Michael M, Shaffrey Christopher I, Passias Peter, Abd-El-Barr Muhammad M, Than Khoi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkiye.

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Oct 25;55(1):43-51. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5941. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5941
PMID:40104322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11913509/
Abstract

Osteobiologics are increasingly used in orthopedics and spine surgery to facilitate bone healing and prevent nonunion. Synthetic osteobiologics are artificial materials crafted in laboratories that aim to replicate the natural composition and functionality of bone. Notable materials such as calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate are engineered to mirror the mineral aspect of bone. They mimic human bone functionality, exhibiting osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. These characteristics promote cell attachment, migration, recruitment, and differentiation. Consequently, synthetic osteobiologics (osteoconductive grafts) have been introduced in bone fracture repair. The main strength of synthetic osteobiologics in spine surgery lies in improving fusion rates and clinical outcomes. The commercial biologics landscape boasts an excess of 350 bone substitute materials, a number that continues to grow exponentially with the development of subtypes. However, the proliferation of these products, primarily driven by the medical device industry and nonacademic entities, has been accompanied by a significant dearth of supporting empirical data. This deficiency underscores the imperative need for rigorous scrutiny and research to establish a solid foundation for their utilization. Healthcare professionals require high-quality research in large prospective studies with satisfactory follow-up periods to interpret and compare the performance of osteobiologics. It is particularly imperative to study the added cost of using these materials in spine surgery. In the current review, we provide an overview of the currently available synthetic osteobiologics used in spine surgery.

摘要

骨生物材料在骨科和脊柱手术中越来越多地被用于促进骨愈合和预防骨不连。合成骨生物材料是在实验室中制造的人工材料,旨在复制骨的天然成分和功能。磷酸钙和硫酸钙等著名材料经过设计,以模仿骨的矿物质成分。它们模拟人体骨功能,具有骨传导性、骨诱导性和成骨特性。这些特性促进细胞附着、迁移、募集和分化。因此,合成骨生物材料(骨传导性移植物)已被引入骨折修复。合成骨生物材料在脊柱手术中的主要优势在于提高融合率和临床疗效。商业生物材料领域有超过350种骨替代材料,随着亚型的发展,这个数字还在呈指数级增长。然而,这些产品的激增主要由医疗器械行业和非学术实体推动,同时伴随着大量实证数据的匮乏。这一缺陷凸显了进行严格审查和研究以建立其使用坚实基础的迫切需求。医疗保健专业人员需要在大型前瞻性研究中进行高质量研究,并进行令人满意的随访,以解释和比较骨生物材料的性能。特别有必要研究在脊柱手术中使用这些材料的额外成本。在本综述中,我们概述了目前在脊柱手术中使用的合成骨生物材料。