• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管疾病患者的数字健康素养及对电子健康技术的态度及其对二级预防的影响:调查研究

Digital Health Literacy and Attitudes Toward eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Their Implications for Secondary Prevention: Survey Study.

作者信息

Ullrich Greta, Bäuerle Alexander, Vogt Hannah, Mahabadi Amir Abbas, Paldán Katrin, Messiha Daniel, Jahre Lisa Maria, Rammos Christos, Rassaf Tienush, Lortz Julia

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 19;9:e63057. doi: 10.2196/63057.

DOI:10.2196/63057
PMID:40106277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939022/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death worldwide, leading to a significant socioeconomic burden. Although secondary prevention is a cornerstone in chronic disease management, adherence to guideline recommendations in this regard often falters, leading to suboptimal outcomes. While eHealth technologies are promising for improving treatment adherence, they also represent a new approach to secondary prevention. However, a common critique is that extensive digitalization may not adequately address the needs of older adults with chronic medical conditions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze eHealth literacy, digital use patterns, and general attitudes toward digital technologies in a collective of patients with cardiovascular disease to identify potential obstacles in implementing mobile health technologies in secondary preventive therapy.

METHODS

This survey-based study was a part of the baseline examination of the PreventiPlaque trial. It involved 240 participants with known coronary artery disease. The assessment evaluated their current understanding of the general use of digital devices. The questionnaire covered aspects such as the duration of daily use, personal attitudes, and the perceived burden associated with digital media. eHealth literacy was assessed within the target population and general demographic data were gathered, focusing on cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed an average age of 61.9 (SD 8.9) years, with 59.9% (n=144) of the participants being male. Overall, 37.3% (n=90) of the participants had previous knowledge of digital health interventions, while only 17.8% (n=41) had used them. Despite the generally low practical application within this study population, there was a high level of confidence in handling digital devices, with 61.9% (n=149) expressing themselves as either rather confident or very confident. Regarding the levels of eHealth literacy among the participants, 71.2% (n=170) claimed to be familiar with locating health information on the internet, and 64% (n=153) of participants felt capable of critically evaluating its quality. These levels of digital confidence were consistent across all age groups. Moreover, internet use rates remained high even among the older participants, with 80% (n=192) of those participants older than 75 years using the internet for 1-3 hours a day.

CONCLUSIONS

The study unveiled a notable confidence level among participants regarding the use of digital devices, coupled with a favorable attitude toward digital media evident across all age brackets. Remarkably, internet use rates remained high, even among older participants. The actual utilization of digital health interventions was relatively low, potentially stemming from challenges in locating reliable sources. These findings emphasize the prospect of future eHealth interventions customized to the distinct needs and preferences of patients in cardiovascular disease management. Recognizing the incongruity between confidence in device use and the restricted adoption of digital health tools can guide the development of focused interventions to narrow this divide.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病是全球主要的死亡原因,导致了巨大的社会经济负担。尽管二级预防是慢性病管理的基石,但在这方面对指南建议的依从性常常不佳,导致治疗效果不理想。虽然电子健康技术有望提高治疗依从性,但它们也是二级预防的一种新方法。然而,一个常见的批评是,广泛的数字化可能无法充分满足患有慢性疾病的老年人的需求。

目的

本研究旨在分析心血管疾病患者群体的电子健康素养、数字使用模式以及对数字技术的总体态度,以确定在二级预防治疗中实施移动健康技术的潜在障碍。

方法

这项基于调查的研究是PreventiPlaque试验基线检查的一部分。它涉及240名已知患有冠状动脉疾病的参与者。评估评估了他们目前对数字设备一般使用的理解。问卷涵盖了诸如每日使用时长、个人态度以及与数字媒体相关的感知负担等方面。在目标人群中评估了电子健康素养,并收集了一般人口统计学数据,重点关注心血管合并症和危险因素。

结果

分析显示平均年龄为61.9(标准差8.9)岁,59.9%(n = 144)的参与者为男性。总体而言,37.3%(n = 90)的参与者以前了解数字健康干预措施,而只有17.8%(n = 41)的人使用过。尽管在该研究人群中实际应用普遍较低,但对操作数字设备有很高的信心,61.9%(n = 149)的人表示自己相当有信心或非常有信心。关于参与者的电子健康素养水平,71.2%(n = 170)声称熟悉在互联网上查找健康信息,64%(n = 153)的参与者认为自己有能力批判性地评估其质量。这些数字信心水平在所有年龄组中都是一致的。此外,即使在老年参与者中互联网使用率也仍然很高,75岁以上的参与者中有80%(n = 192)每天使用互联网1 - 3小时。

结论

该研究揭示了参与者在使用数字设备方面有显著的信心水平,并且在所有年龄段对数字媒体都有积极的态度。值得注意的是,即使在老年参与者中互联网使用率也仍然很高。数字健康干预措施的实际使用率相对较低,这可能是由于难以找到可靠的信息来源。这些发现强调了未来针对心血管疾病管理中患者的独特需求和偏好定制电子健康干预措施的前景。认识到在设备使用信心和数字健康工具采用受限之间的不协调可以指导制定有针对性的干预措施来缩小这一差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/6eab71d04634/formative-v9-e63057-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/07a59b298866/formative-v9-e63057-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/d15847476c0f/formative-v9-e63057-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/364596a29487/formative-v9-e63057-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/cad1365fbed9/formative-v9-e63057-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/6eab71d04634/formative-v9-e63057-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/07a59b298866/formative-v9-e63057-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/d15847476c0f/formative-v9-e63057-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/364596a29487/formative-v9-e63057-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/cad1365fbed9/formative-v9-e63057-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adcb/11939022/6eab71d04634/formative-v9-e63057-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Health Literacy and Attitudes Toward eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Their Implications for Secondary Prevention: Survey Study.心血管疾病患者的数字健康素养及对电子健康技术的态度及其对二级预防的影响:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 19;9:e63057. doi: 10.2196/63057.
2
eHealth literacy in the general population: a cross-sectional study in China.普通人群的电子健康素养:一项中国的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21389-0.
3
Sociodigital Determinants of eHealth Literacy and Related Impact on Health Outcomes and eHealth Use in Korean Older Adults: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.社会数字因素对韩国老年人电子健康素养的影响及其对健康结果和电子健康使用的相关影响:基于社区的横断面调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 13;7:e56061. doi: 10.2196/56061.
4
Relationship Between Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-Based Survey Study.美国成年人中与冠状病毒相关的电子健康素养与COVID-19知识、态度和行为之间的关系:基于网络的调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 29;23(3):e25042. doi: 10.2196/25042.
5
Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Disease Knowledge, and Preventive Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Netizens.新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、疾病知识及预防行为:针对中国网民的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684. doi: 10.2196/19684.
6
Assessment of Technology Readiness in Norwegian Older Adults With Long-Term Health Conditions Receiving Home Care Services: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.对接受家庭护理服务的患有长期健康状况的挪威老年人的技术准备情况评估:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 7;8:e62936. doi: 10.2196/62936.
7
Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD.移动医疗(mHealth)技术:在慢性肾脏病中的可用性、可接受性和使用评估。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jun;77(6):941-950.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey.德国的数字化与健康:全国性横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 22;7(11):e32951. doi: 10.2196/32951.
9
eHealth Literacy and Health-Related Internet Use Among Swedish Primary Health Care Visitors: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.瑞典初级卫生保健就诊者的电子健康素养与健康相关互联网使用情况:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 5;8:e63288. doi: 10.2196/63288.
10
Assessing Health Technology Literacy and Attitudes of Patients in an Urban Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.评估城市门诊精神科诊所患者的健康技术素养和态度:横断面调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 30;11:e63034. doi: 10.2196/63034.

引用本文的文献

1
Seize the advantages of cardiac rehabilitation.抓住心脏康复的优势。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2519680. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2519680. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers and barriers of patients' acceptance of video consultation in cancer care.癌症护理中患者接受视频会诊的驱动因素和障碍
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 4;10:20552076231222108. doi: 10.1177/20552076231222108. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Psychometric properties of the German revised version of the eHealth literacy scale in individuals with cardiac diseases: Validation and test of measurement invariance.心脏病患者中eHealth素养量表德文修订版的心理测量特性:测量不变性的验证与测试
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 14;9:20552076231194915. doi: 10.1177/20552076231194915. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Acceptance, drivers, and barriers to use eHealth interventions in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome for management of post-COVID-19 symptoms: a cross-sectional study.
新冠后综合征患者使用电子健康干预措施管理新冠后症状的接受度、驱动因素和障碍:一项横断面研究
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023 May 27;16:17562864231175730. doi: 10.1177/17562864231175730. eCollection 2023.
4
Determining the Acceptance of Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation and Its Influencing Factors among Patients Affected by Cardiac Diseases.确定心脏病患者对数字心脏康复的接受度及其影响因素。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Apr 17;10(4):174. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040174.
5
Effect of visual presentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque on adherence to secondary preventive therapy using mHealth technologies ( app): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.使用移动健康技术(应用程序)对动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉斑块进行可视化呈现对二级预防治疗依从性的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 27;9(3):e14052. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14052. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study.德国患者对处方和全额报销的移动健康应用程序的接受度:基于 UTAUT2 的在线调查研究。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 27;47(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01910-x.
7
Barriers and Supports in eHealth Implementation among People with Chronic Cardiovascular Ailments: Integrative Review.电子健康实施中的障碍和支持因素:慢性病心血管疾病患者的综合评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8296. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148296.
8
Predicting Acceptance of e-Mental Health Interventions in Patients With Obesity by Using an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance Model: Cross-sectional Study.运用扩展的接受模型统一理论预测肥胖患者对电子心理健康干预措施的接受度:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 17;6(3):e31229. doi: 10.2196/31229.
9
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
10
DiGA - A Chance for the German Healthcare System.数字医疗应用程序——德国医疗保健系统的一个机遇。
J Eur CME. 2021 Dec 23;11(1):2014047. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2021.2014047. eCollection 2022.