Thompson Darcy A, Kaizer Laura K, Schmiege Sarah J, Cabrera Natasha J, Clark Lauren, Ringwood Haley, Miramontes Valdes Estefania, Tschann Jeanne M
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Mar 5;13:1496225. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1496225. eCollection 2025.
With the increasing integration of digital screen devices into our everyday life, there has been increased attention regarding the risk of "problematic" use or pathological use. Because children start using screen devices in the first few years of life, early identification of those at risk for future problematic use could inform early prevention efforts. Children's attraction to screen devices in early childhood may identify those at risk for future problematic use; however currently, there are no measures of toddlers' attraction or affinity to screen devices. The objective of this study was to develop survey measures of toddler affinity to screen media, inclusive of televisions, smartphones, and tablets.
Measures were developed using an exploratory sequential mixed methods (qualitative -> quantitative) approach. Participants were Mexican American mothers of toddlers 15-26 months old. Findings from semi-structured interviews were used to develop items reflecting parental reports of child affinity to screen devices. Items were administered by phone to 384 mothers. Analyses included evaluation of the factor structure and psychometric properties of Affinity-TV (10 items) and Affinity-Mobile (12 items), and evaluations of correlations between each scale with social emotional outcomes and demographic characteristics.
Factor analysis supported a one-factor solution for each scale. Reliabilities were acceptable for both scales (Cronbach's alpha > .75). There was a significant positive correlation between Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile (rs = 0.44, < 0.001). Affinity-TV was significantly positively correlated with toddler average daily minutes of TV use (rs = 0.27, < 0.001) and average daily minutes of mobile use (rs = 0.10, < 0.05). Affinity-Mobile was significantly positively correlated with toddler average daily minutes of mobile use (rs = 0.31, < 0.001), but not with average daily minutes of TV (rs = -0.04, NS). Each scale was correlated with social emotional developmental outcomes.
The Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile scales have good initial reliability and adequate predictive validity. These findings support the use of Affinity-TV and Affinity-Mobile in toddlers as measures of children's attraction to screen devices. These measures may help to identify early risk for problematic use, and they offer a novel way to evaluate a child's behavioral reaction to screen devices in early childhood.
随着数字屏幕设备日益融入我们的日常生活,人们越来越关注“问题性”使用或病理性使用的风险。由于儿童在生命的最初几年就开始使用屏幕设备,早期识别那些未来有问题性使用风险的儿童可为早期预防工作提供信息。幼儿期儿童对屏幕设备的吸引力可能预示着未来有问题性使用的风险;然而目前,尚无衡量幼儿对屏幕设备的吸引力或亲和力的方法。本研究的目的是开发一套针对幼儿对屏幕媒体(包括电视、智能手机和平板电脑)亲和力的调查量表。
采用探索性序列混合方法(定性→定量)开发量表。参与者为15至26个月大幼儿的墨西哥裔美国母亲。半结构化访谈的结果用于制定反映家长报告的孩子对屏幕设备亲和力的条目。通过电话向384位母亲发放这些条目。分析包括对电视亲和力量表(10个条目)和移动设备亲和力量表(12个条目)的因子结构和心理测量特性的评估,以及对每个量表与社会情感结果和人口统计学特征之间相关性的评估。
因子分析支持每个量表的单因子解决方案。两个量表的信度均可接受(克朗巴哈系数>0.75)。电视亲和力量表和移动设备亲和力量表之间存在显著正相关(rs = 0.44,P < 0.001)。电视亲和力量表与幼儿平均每日看电视时间显著正相关(rs = 0.27,P < 0.001),与平均每日使用移动设备时间也显著正相关(rs = 0.10,P < 0.05)。移动设备亲和力量表与幼儿平均每日使用移动设备时间显著正相关(rs = 0.31,P < 0.001),但与平均每日看电视时间无显著相关性(rs = -0.04,无统计学意义)。每个量表都与社会情感发展结果相关。
电视亲和力量表和移动设备亲和力量表具有良好的初始信度和足够的预测效度。这些发现支持将电视亲和力量表和移动设备亲和力量表用于幼儿,作为衡量儿童对屏幕设备吸引力的指标。这些量表可能有助于识别早期问题性使用的风险,并为评估幼儿期儿童对屏幕设备的行为反应提供一种新方法。