• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项以患者为中心的优先研究议程,以减少远程医疗使用方面的差距:全国共识会议的结果。

A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake: Results from a National Consensus Conference.

作者信息

Rising Kristin L, Kemp Mackenzie, Leader Amy E, Chang Anna Marie, Monick Andrew J, Guth Amanda, Esteves Camacho Tracy, Laynor Gregory, Worster Brooke

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Jefferson Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Telemed Rep. 2023 Dec 29;4(1):387-395. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0051
PMID:38169980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10758542/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We hosted a national consensus conference with a diverse group of stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda focused on reducing disparities in telehealth use.

METHODS

Attendees were purposively invited to participate in a 2-day virtual conference. The group developed a prioritized research agenda focused on reducing disparities in telehealth uptake, with discussion informed by findings from a scoping review. All work was conducted in partnership with a Steering Committee of national experts in telehealth and patient-centered care ( = 5) and a community-based Telehealth Advisory Board with experience with telehealth use and barriers ( = 8).

RESULTS

Sixty individuals participated in the conference and discussion resulted in a final list of 20 questions. Fifty-two attendees voted on the final prioritization of these questions. Results were aggregated for all voters ( = 52) and patient-only voters ( = 8). The top question identified by both groups focused on patient and family perspectives on important barriers to telehealth use. The entire group voting identified telehealth's impact on patient outcomes as the next most important questions, while the patient-only group identified trust-related considerations and cultural factors impacting telehealth use as next priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

This project involved extensive patient and stakeholder engagement. While voting varied between patients only and the entire group of conference attendees, top identified priorities included patient and family perspectives on important barriers to telehealth, trust and cultural barriers and facilitators to telehealth, and assessment of telehealth's impact on patient outcomes. This research agenda can inform design of future research focused on addressing disparities in telehealth use.

摘要

引言

我们举办了一次全国性共识会议,邀请了不同的利益相关者群体,以制定一个以患者为中心的研究议程,重点是减少远程医疗使用方面的差距。

方法

有目的地邀请与会者参加为期两天的虚拟会议。该小组制定了一个优先研究议程,重点是减少远程医疗采用方面的差距,并参考了范围综述的结果进行讨论。所有工作均与远程医疗和以患者为中心的护理方面的国家专家指导委员会(n = 5)以及具有远程医疗使用经验和障碍的社区远程医疗咨询委员会(n = 8)合作开展。

结果

60人参加了会议,讨论产生了一份包含20个问题的最终清单。52名与会者对这些问题的最终优先级进行了投票。汇总了所有选民(n = 52)和仅患者选民(n = 8)的投票结果。两组确定的首要问题都集中在患者和家庭对远程医疗使用重要障碍的看法上。全体投票者确定远程医疗对患者结局的影响是其次重要的问题,而仅患者组则将与信任相关的考虑因素以及影响远程医疗使用的文化因素列为其次的优先事项。

结论

该项目广泛地让患者和利益相关者参与进来。虽然仅患者组和全体会议与会者之间的投票存在差异,但确定的首要优先事项包括患者和家庭对远程医疗重要障碍的看法、远程医疗的信任和文化障碍及促进因素,以及对远程医疗对患者结局影响的评估。该研究议程可为未来旨在解决远程医疗使用差距的研究设计提供参考依据。

相似文献

1
A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake: Results from a National Consensus Conference.一项以患者为中心的优先研究议程,以减少远程医疗使用方面的差距:全国共识会议的结果。
Telemed Rep. 2023 Dec 29;4(1):387-395. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051. eCollection 2023.
2
Early Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Experience With the Use of Telehealth to Address Disparities: Scoping Review.早期以患者为中心的远程医疗应用于解决差异的结果研究经验:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 7;23(12):e28503. doi: 10.2196/28503.
3
Telehealth in emergency medicine: A consensus conference to map the intersection of telehealth and emergency medicine.急诊医学中的远程医疗:绘制远程医疗与急诊医学交叉领域的共识会议。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;28(12):1452-1474. doi: 10.1111/acem.14330. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study†  ‡.未来不孕不育研究的 10 大重点:国际共识发展研究†‡。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Dec 1;35(12):2715-2724. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa242.
5
Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.未来不孕不育研究的 10 大重点:一项国际共识发展研究。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
7
Perceptions of Telehealth vs In-Person Visits Among Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease, Care Partners, and Clinicians.老年晚期肾病患者、照护者和临床医生对远程医疗与面对面就诊的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37193.
8
Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda.制定一项全市范围的、社区参与的癌症差异研究议程。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jan;36(1):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01919-8. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
9
Child Health, Vulnerability, and Complexity: Use of Telehealth to Enhance Care for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs.儿童健康、脆弱性与复杂性:利用远程医疗改善对有特殊医疗需求的儿童和青少年的护理
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Mar;22(2S):S34-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.10.010.
10
Beyond diversity and inclusion: Developing a research agenda for anti-racism in emergency medicine education.超越多样性与包容性:制定急诊医学教育中的反种族主义研究议程。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jun 27;7(Suppl 1):S68-S77. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10876. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to telehealth uptake and use: a scoping review.远程医疗采用和使用的障碍:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2025 Mar 19;8(2):ooaf019. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf019. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Addressing barriers to equitable telehealth for older adults.解决老年人公平获得远程医疗服务的障碍。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 23;12:1483366. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1483366. eCollection 2025.
3
Telehealth equity and access communication skills pilot simulation for practicing clinicians.针对执业临床医生的远程医疗公平性与获取沟通技能试点模拟
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0302804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302804. eCollection 2025.
4
Establishing trust in emergency telehealth consultations.在紧急远程医疗会诊中建立信任。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14543. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14543. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
5
Stroke patient and stakeholder engagement (SPSE): concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks-a systematic scoping review.卒中患者和利益相关者参与(SPSE):概念、定义、模型、实施策略、指标和框架——系统范围界定综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;13(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02686-y.
6
Perspectives from patients with chronic lung disease on a telehealth-facilitated integrated palliative care model: a qualitative content analysis study.慢性肺部疾病患者对远程医疗支持的综合姑息治疗模式的看法:一项定性内容分析研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 18;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01433-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group.从咨询转向与知识使用者共同创作:来自 JBI 范围综述方法学小组的指导。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):969-979. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00416.
2
Trends in Use of Telehealth Among Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, June 26-November 6, 2020.新冠疫情期间健康中心远程医疗使用趋势 - 美国,2020 年 6 月 26 日-11 月 6 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 19;70(7):240-244. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7007a3.
3
Delay or Avoidance of Medical Care Because of COVID-19-Related Concerns - United States, June 2020.由于对 COVID-19 的担忧而延迟或避免就医-美国,2020 年 6 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4.
4
Increasing access to care: telehealth during COVID-19.增加医疗服务可及性:新冠疫情期间的远程医疗
J Law Biosci. 2020 Jun 16;7(1):lsaa043. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa043. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.