Zegarra-Chapoñan Roberto, Zeladita-Huaman Jhon Alex, Cuba-Sancho Juana Matilde, Castillo-Parra Henry, Moran-Paredes Gladys Ivonne, Cárdenas-Niño Lucila
. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad María Auxiliadora, Lima, Perú. Email:
. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Email:
Rev Cuid. 2023 May 28;14(1):e14. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2679. eCollection 2023 Jan-Apr.
Parenting styles determine child behavior; however, there is little information on their impact on bullying.
To determine the association between different parenting styles and the role assumed in bullying, as well as to identify adolescents' profiles according to their involvement in bullying.
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in Lima, Peru, in 2019. The Steinberg's Parenting Styles Scale and the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (EBIP-Q) were administered to 563 students from public schools. Scores were obtained by confirmatory factor analysis. Spearman's correlation coefficient, Pearson's Chi-square test, and multinomial logistic regression analysis were used.
There is an association between parenting styles and adolescents' role in bullying. The multivariate analysis reported that being male was associated with the role of the bully (OR: 2.73; 95% CI 1.59-4.68), while access to social media (OR: 2.23; CI 95% 1.11-4.49), being male (OR: 1.75; CI=1.06-2.88), and parenting styles (neglectful [OR: 2.72; 95% CI 1.32-5.59] and mixed [OR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.16-0.91] compared to authoritarian parenting style) were predictors of the role of the victimized bully.
The association found in the study confirms previous findings; however, it opens the debate on the influence of neglectful parenting style on bullying dynamics.
Both neglectful and authoritarian parenting styles (lower proportion) have a positive and significant effect on the role of victimized bully.
育儿方式决定孩子的行为;然而,关于它们对欺凌行为的影响,我们所知甚少。
确定不同育儿方式与在欺凌行为中所扮演角色之间的关联,并根据青少年参与欺凌行为的情况确定其特征。
2019年在秘鲁利马进行了一项横断面分析研究。对563名公立学校学生进行了施泰因贝格育儿方式量表和欧洲欺凌干预项目问卷(EBIP-Q)的测试。通过验证性因素分析获得分数。使用了斯皮尔曼相关系数、皮尔逊卡方检验和多项逻辑回归分析。
育儿方式与青少年在欺凌行为中所扮演的角色之间存在关联。多变量分析表明,男性与欺凌者的角色相关(比值比:2.73;95%置信区间1.59 - 4.68),而使用社交媒体(比值比:2.23;95%置信区间1.11 - 4.49)、男性(比值比:1.75;置信区间 = 1.06 - 2.88)以及育儿方式(与专制型育儿方式相比,忽视型[比值比:2.72;95%置信区间1.32 - 5.59]和混合型[比值比:0.38;95%置信区间0.16 - 0.91])是受欺凌的欺凌者角色的预测因素。
该研究中发现的关联证实了先前的研究结果;然而,它引发了关于忽视型育儿方式对欺凌动态影响的争论。
忽视型和专制型育儿方式(比例较低)对受欺凌的欺凌者角色均有积极且显著的影响。